Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 15,428
- 5,223
- 210
That's the basis of their cult. They never think.How the fuck do you think that means he was “invited in”?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's the basis of their cult. They never think.How the fuck do you think that means he was “invited in”?
He seems to have acted completely independently that day. He was not coordinating with his buddies.If you and three of your buddies rob a gas station and one of them shoots and kills the clerk, are you not all charged with being an accomplice to a homicide?
Escorting them out would have been pointless. They’d come right back in. The police had no control over the building.
Shooting someone was a means of last resort as rioters were trying to breach the House Chambers where lawmakers were still being evacuated.
The link says he was asked to leave at 2:16, minutes after he entered and when he first encountered officers.
You should have actually read it
I think his fuzzy jammies scares Dimwingers.He seems to have acted completely independently that day. He was not coordinating with his buddies.
He didn't break anything, steal anything, or hurt anyone. He called for everyone to remain peaceful. He stopped someone trying to raid the snack room. He obeyed the instructions of officers, and exited the senate chamber when asked to. Later, he told protestors over his megaphone that Trump tweeted everyone should go home. He may not be a saint, but he was a peacekeeper.
His lawyer has confirmed that the DOJ whithheld evidence he was being escorted around by numerous officers.
He deserves a new trial (and probably a better lawyer).
Ok so when people are outside of any locked building waiting for access , and the doors are closed and then opened, they are being let it.I didn’t say he committed any violence. I said the people he was with smashed their way into the building.
How the fuck do you think that means he was “invited in”?
Fumblenutless, no link is required for avatars.Link required for you to continue causing John Belushi to spin in his grave every time you post using his face as your avatar.
Lmao. That’s what you’re going with?Ok so when people are outside of any locked building waiting for access , and the doors are closed and then opened, they are being let it.
Let's get everyone identified on video doing any kind of damage and see who they are. It can be done, why hasn't it?Lmao. That’s what you’re going with?
Ok, let’s suppose that a mob of 100 people break into your house. The first 20 people smash the windows and climb inside. Then the other 80 people walk through the door.
Were those 80 people “invited in”?
And again, because the government withheld evidence, there is a great chance the plea will be allowed to be withdrawn. Therein his plea can’t be used against him.Good luck with that. He already pleaded guilty and it’s obvious that he did exactly that.
Evidence of the elements of the crimes with which he was and may yet again be charged (other than trespass).What evidence are you looking for?
The issue isn’t what the mob did. The issue is what Shaman-boi “did” other than commit trespass?We all saw the video and we all know what those idiots did.
Yep. That’s the charge. And those include some of the required elements. And physical presence does establish trespass. But what other evidence do you have to meet the burden on those elements?“…otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”
I don’t know. He will likely be returned to a status of presumed innocence. So what evidence do you have?Did he obstruct, influence, or impede an official proceeding, or attempt to do so?
So which is it?
I still haven't seen a video of Capitol Police Opening up the doors to the Capitol and inviting them in.
I did see video of protesters smashing in windows then those same people (not police) opening up the doors to the Capitol from the inside.
When he was asked to leave the floor of the senate, he peacefully complied. Video here....Where is the evidence that he was asked to leave?
“Great chance“And again, because the government withheld evidence, there is a great chance the plea will be allowed to be withdrawn.
You don’t know if he obstructed, influenced, or impeded an official proceeding, or attempted to do so????I don’t know. He will likely be returned to a status of presumed innocence. So what evidence do you have?
I didn’t say he committed any violence. I said the people he was with smashed their way into the building.
How the fuck do you think that means he was “invited in”?
I don’t care if you disagree. Time will tell. But the discovery rights of an accused are generally guarded by courts quite seriously. This is also true of alleged Brady violations which deserve and get even a stricter scrutiny.“Great chance“
Right. Good luck.
There is nothing to “go with”Lmao. That’s what you’re going with?
Ok, let’s suppose that a mob of 100 people break into your house. The first 20 people smash the windows and climb inside. Then the other 80 people walk through the door.
Were those 80 people “invited in”?
And I’m sure you guys will go right back to making baseless conspiracy theory claims if you don’t get your way.I don’t care if you disagree. Time will tell. But the discovery rights of an accused are generally guarded by courts quite seriously. This is also true of alleged Brady violations which deserve and get even a stricter scrutiny.
Leftists scum like him support the weaponization of our DOJ.I don’t care if you disagree. Time will tell. But the discovery rights of an accused are generally guarded by courts quite seriously. This is also true of alleged Brady violations which deserve and get even a stricter scrutiny.
Right. So he was part of the mob that smashed their way into the building but he thought he was invited in. Lmao.We don't know that. The video shows he came in from a different side than the assholes smashing in the front.
That's the point.
You can try answering the question this time.There is nothing to “go with”
It’s a visual fact and you can’t discredit that nor name call/blather it away.