NJ Dem leader refuses to concede to GOP truck driver, says thousands of ballots 'recently found'

It doesn't matter which side thinks they're getting screwed. That perception is bad either way and mail in voting is 100% responsible. We need to do away with mail in voting and demand an ID at the polls. Of course our military would still be able to vote via absentee ballots

No! Cause black people cant find their polling place or use computers!
 
The Goodwill granted to the U.S for so many decades by other nations has taken a hit for various reasons over the last few decades, but no realization would be as damaging as if other nations assesses that America is no longer a democracy.
A few other factors to be considered:
1. Do other countries consider America lost to Trump's fascist attempts or is it not being taken seriously until it fully develops?

2. The demonization of China. That won't slow China's progress but it's going to have an effect on where other countries will place their loyalty. Most of the small countries have already chosen China but important countries such as Germany will tell the story. Germany is slowly gravitating toward Russia, and toward China by association.

3. America has lost the ability to intimidate small countries into supporting America. There is far too much military strength in the rest of the world that deters US aggression now.

4. Most larger democracies will be in limbo until the end of Trump. And likewise, will move away from Trump taking America into full blown fascism.
 
I wonder how long Blacks are going to let Dems. insinuate that they are helpless, ignorant assholes?
They started with Trump. That’s why the demleftists had to shut down the swing states and add more votes. They underestimated their original steal count and we’re shocked at the amount of black votes for Trump.
 
A few other factors to be considered:
1. Do other countries consider America lost to Trump's fascist attempts or is it not being taken seriously until it fully develops?

2. The demonization of China. That won't slow China's progress but it's going to have an effect on where other countries will place their loyalty. Most of the small countries have already chosen China but important countries such as Germany will tell the story. Germany is slowly gravitating toward Russia, and toward China by association.

3. America has lost the ability to intimidate small countries into supporting America. There is far too much military strength in the rest of the world that deters US aggression now.

4. Most larger democracies will be in limbo until the end of Trump. And likewise, will move away from Trump taking America into full blown fascism.

Trump isn't the problem. He presents some issues yes, but not in the way some view them. Generation of Establishment politicians and their deep pocket donors when coupled with a lack of term limits are a FAR greater problem. This last issue alone is going to sink the West.

Trump won on policy, shutting out both Establishment sweethearts Jeb Bush and Clinton. He wasn't in the political circles for decades earning a living as a politician.

Why was Hillary running? She is the wife of a former president. How about George W Bush, Jeb Bush...dad was the president, so "hey it only makes sense that I should be too, right"? I heard some suggest that Hillary was the "most qualified candidate in history". Really? How so?

Clinton and Bush didn't secure your border, nor slow down China, nor expand American global influence. Ditto for Obama. The West has been in decline for years because we've all embraced what we used to laugh at other Shytehole countries about. Elitism and entitlement of a perpetual political class. It's how Tin Pot Dictatorships become realities.
 
Trump isn't the problem. He presents some issues yes, but not in the way some view them. Generation of Establishment politicians and their deep pocket donors when coupled with a lack of term limits are a FAR greater problem. This last issue alone is going to sink the West.
You're describing the root of the problem but jumping to the next correct conclusion. It's the result of America's huge income inequality which has ripped off the working class. Then, in desperation, the people turned to Trump.
So we are in agreement!

Trump won on policy, shutting out both Establishment sweethearts Jeb Bush and Clinton. He wasn't in the political circles for decades earning a living as a politician.
Trump capitalized on the desperation of the American people. He used his border wall as his racist tactic that attracted Americans on the theory that immigrants took Americans' jobs.
Why was Hillary running? She is the wife of a former president. How about George W Bush, Jeb Bush...dad was the president, so "hey it only makes sense that I should be too, right"? I heard some suggest that Hillary was the "most qualified candidate in history". Really? How so?
Hillary was a terrible candidate who represented the exact opposite of what the common people needed and wanted. So back to your correct analysis of " Generation(s) of Establishment politicians."
Clinton and Bush didn't secure your border, nor slow down China, nor expand American global influence. Ditto for Obama. The West has been in decline for years because we've all embraced what we used to laugh at other Shytehole countries about. Elitism and entitlement of a perpetual political class. It's how Tin Pot Dictatorships become realities.
It's how fascism is born out of a democracy. But the distinction from tinpot dictatorships isn't important.
 
Biden is exactly right on target for what ails America. If he can bring in the money for the working class and then politicallly spin it as a success, then he wins the hearts and minds of the long-suffering American.

It's absolutely essential that anything Biden accomplishes is politically spun by the Republicans as a failure.

Can Biden get the 1.75 trillion? And if he gets it then can it be spun as a win? Or will it be spun as a Republican win in that it's only half of what Biden wanted?

Is it already a sure thing that Biden won't even get the 1.75? I think so.
 
Biden is exactly right on target for what ails America. If he can bring in the money for the working class and then politicallly spin it as a success, then he wins the hearts and minds of the long-suffering American.

It's absolutely essential that anything Biden accomplishes is politically spun by the Republicans as a failure.

Can Biden get the 1.75 trillion? And if he gets it then can it be spun as a win? Or will it be spun as a Republican win in that it's only half of what Biden wanted?

Is it already a sure thing that Biden won't even get the 1.75? I think so.
I can assure you that 99% of the $1.75 T isn't going to benefit Americans in any way.
They're trying to destroy the economy.
They've been using the COVID pandemic so they could create the false need for all of these massive bills.
They already have over $2 Trillion that's already passed earlier this year and they want another $5 Trillion to spend as well.
 
I can assure you that 99% of the $1.75 T isn't going to benefit Americans in any way.
They're trying to destroy the economy.
That's the talking point that will need to politically spun by the R's.
But in fact most likely won't be needed because it's almost a sure thing that Biden won't get the 1.75t.
 
No....they just count the same ballots over and over till they get the desired result.
Christine Gregoire steals Washington State gubernatorial race from Dino Rossi in 2004.
They simply kept recounting until they "found" the votes needed to win.

Deja vu all over again?
 

Forum List

Back
Top