I asked you what part of my statement you disagreed with.
You ran away from defending your position in the context of a real world result.
best use of resources; that situation could be ethically handled by "women of corrections" who may inform male inmates, that they are being "corrected" for their own good, and for the good of society of which they are now part.
The best "use of resources" is not to import hostile Third World Barbarians into our society.
That saves women like that victim in the OP from being victimized, something "correcting" inmates after the fact does not do.
a market friendly work visa can help solve that problem; along with bargaining with the Chines for section eight housing.
Giving the rapists housing would not make them not rapists.
IMO, we should NOT import hostile Third World Barbarians into our society.
I asked you if you had empathy for the victim. YOu did not answer.
WHAT point of your polices are designed to or are you prepared to bend on, to protect women from such vile pieces of shit, and please explain how your effort would work as well as NOT importing the rapists in the first place?