Between fiscal years 2010 - 2020, more than $350 million in royalties were paid by third parties to the National Institutes of Health and its scientists. Dr. Anthony Fauci received 23 royalty payments, but the NIH has yet to disclose the sum total of those payments.
childrenshealthdefense.org
This dirty bastard can’t be sent to prison fast enough. Crime against humanity have an entirely new meaning now , between Fauci and Bill Gates these two are nut jobs on steriods. Bill Gates isn’t even a flippen as doctor yet ppl obey him like he’s a medical God lmfao. The bastard is not a doctor.
If we had a real investigative journalism media & uncompromised justice system, both Gates & Fauxi would already be under indictment, if not serving prison terms or sweating on death row
Between fiscal years 2010 - 2020, more than $350 million in royalties were paid by third parties to the National Institutes of Health and its scientists. Dr. Anthony Fauci received 23 royalty payments, but the NIH has yet to disclose the sum total of those payments.
childrenshealthdefense.org
This dirty bastard can’t be sent to prison fast enough. Crime against humanity have an entirely new meaning now , between Fauci and Bill Gates these two are nut jobs on steriods. Bill Gates isn’t even a flippen as doctor yet ppl obey him like he’s a medical God lmfao. The bastard is not a doctor.
Nothing wrong here. Nothing to hide lime tbe Trumps need to
“During the pandemic year of 2020, their household income, perks and benefits, and unrealized gains totaled $1,776,479 — including federal income and benefits of $868,812; outside royalties and travel perks totaling $113,298; and investment accounts increasing by $794,369.”
Nothing wrong here. Nothing to hide lime tbe Trumps need to
“During the pandemic year of 2020, their household income, perks and benefits, and unrealized gains totaled $1,776,479 — including federal income and benefits of $868,812; outside royalties and travel perks totaling $113,298; and investment accounts increasing by $794,369.”
I used to think you might be smart. . You are either a shill for the establishment, or just plain stupid.
From the article;
". . . However, in our breaking investigation, we found hundreds of millions of dollars in payments also flow the other way. These are royalty payments from third-party payers (think pharmaceutical companies) back to the NIH and individual NIH scientists.
We estimate that between fiscal years 2010 and 2020, more than $350 million in royalties were paid by third-parties to the agency and NIH scientists – who are credited as co-inventors.
Because those payments enrich the agency and its scientists, each and every royalty payment could be a potential conflict of interest and needs disclosure.
Recently, our organization at OpenTheBooks.com forced NIH to disclose over 22,100 royalty payments totaling nearly $134 million paid to the agency and nearly 1,700 NIH scientists. These payments occurred during the most recently available period (September 2009 – September 2014).. . . "
I used to think you might be smart. . You are either a shill for the establishment, or just plain stupid.
From the article;
". . . However, in our breaking investigation, we found hundreds of millions of dollars in payments also flow the other way. These are royalty payments from third-party payers (think pharmaceutical companies) back to the NIH and individual NIH scientists.
We estimate that between fiscal years 2010 and 2020, more than $350 million in royalties were paid by third-parties to the agency and NIH scientists – who are credited as co-inventors.
Because those payments enrich the agency and its scientists, each and every royalty payment could be a potential conflict of interest and needs disclosure.
Recently, our organization at OpenTheBooks.com forced NIH to disclose over 22,100 royalty payments totaling nearly $134 million paid to the agency and nearly 1,700 NIH scientists. These payments occurred during the most recently available period (September 2009 – September 2014).. . . "
I used to think you might be smart. . You are either a shill for the establishment, or just plain stupid.
From the article;
". . . However, in our breaking investigation, we found hundreds of millions of dollars in payments also flow the other way. These are royalty payments from third-party payers (think pharmaceutical companies) back to the NIH and individual NIH scientists.
We estimate that between fiscal years 2010 and 2020, more than $350 million in royalties were paid by third-parties to the agency and NIH scientists – who are credited as co-inventors.
Because those payments enrich the agency and its scientists, each and every royalty payment could be a potential conflict of interest and needs disclosure.
Recently, our organization at OpenTheBooks.com forced NIH to disclose over 22,100 royalty payments totaling nearly $134 million paid to the agency and nearly 1,700 NIH scientists. These payments occurred during the most recently available period (September 2009 – September 2014).. . . "
In a hot-mic moment, Dr. Anthony Fauci called Sen. Roger Marshall a "moron" after the Kansas Republican asked Fauci to publicly release "a financial disclosure form." Marshall appeared unaware that federal law already requires Fauci to submit annual financial disclosure reports, which are public.
I already know that corruption and conflicts of interest are legal, I am not saying that anything they are doing, is "illegal." That is not the issue here.
You aren't telling me anything I don't already know. The problem? We need to hold these psychopaths accountable for what they are doing to our nation.
Nor are you proving that article in sub-stack false.
You'll notice, in the link given BY YOUR OWN LINK;
". . . In the above examples, although we know the number of payments to each scientist, we still don’t know how much money was paid – because the dollar figure was deleted (redacted) from the disclosures.
It’s been a struggle to get any useful information out of the agency on its royalty payments. NIH is acting like royalty payments are a state secret. (They’re not, or shouldn’t be!)
Consider how NIH is using taxpayer money to try and keep taxpayers ignorant and in the dark:
1. NIH defied the federal Freedom of Information Act law and refused to even acknowledge our open records request for the royalty payments. We filed our FOIA last September.
2. NIH used expensive taxpayer-funded litigation to slow-walk royalty disclosures (releasing the oldest royalties first). Although the agency admits to holding 3,000 pages, it will take ten months to produce them (300 pages per month). With Judicial Watch as our lawyers, we sued NIH in federal court last October.
3. NIH is heavily redacting key information on the royalty payments. For example, the agency erased 1. the payment amount, and, 2. who paid it! This makes the court-mandated production virtually worthless, despite our use of the latest forensic auditing tools.
NIH is essentially telling you, the taxpayer, to pay up and shut up. They'll run things. They have forgotten that they work on behalf of the American people. .. "
Go to the very bottom of and look at "Transactions Total" Tell me what that number is.
Without that number? That entire. . . "Factcheck.org" piece? Nothing but gaslighting.
Can you be anymore stupid? You post a link, that has a link, that emphasizes that point of my sub-stack article. . . THANKS!
I already know that corruption and conflicts of interest are legal, I am not saying that anything they are doing, is "illegal." That is not the issue here.
You aren't telling me anything I don't already know. The problem? We need to hold these psychopaths accountable for what they are doing to our nation.
Nor are you proving that article in sub-stack false.
You'll notice, in the link given BY YOUR OWN LINK;
". . . In the above examples, although we know the number of payments to each scientist, we still don’t know how much money was paid – because the dollar figure was deleted (redacted) from the disclosures.
It’s been a struggle to get any useful information out of the agency on its royalty payments. NIH is acting like royalty payments are a state secret. (They’re not, or shouldn’t be!)
Consider how NIH is using taxpayer money to try and keep taxpayers ignorant and in the dark:
1. NIH defied the federal Freedom of Information Act law and refused to even acknowledge our open records request for the royalty payments. We filed our FOIA last September.
2. NIH used expensive taxpayer-funded litigation to slow-walk royalty disclosures (releasing the oldest royalties first). Although the agency admits to holding 3,000 pages, it will take ten months to produce them (300 pages per month). With Judicial Watch as our lawyers, we sued NIH in federal court last October.
3. NIH is heavily redacting key information on the royalty payments. For example, the agency erased 1. the payment amount, and, 2. who paid it! This makes the court-mandated production virtually worthless, despite our use of the latest forensic auditing tools.
NIH is essentially telling you, the taxpayer, to pay up and shut up. They'll run things. They have forgotten that they work on behalf of the American people. .. "
Go to the very bottom of and look at "Transactions Total" Tell me what that number is.
Without that number? That entire. . . "Factcheck.org" piece? Nothing but gaslighting.
Can you be anymore stupid? You post a link, that has a link, that emphasizes that point of my sub-stack article. . . THANKS!
childrenshealthdefense.org
