::yawn:: done yet? My god that was the most boring babblation ever.
I feel your pain, how dare anyone question the party or the state media.
And completely irrelevant since Murrow's show wasn't about any of that; it was about McCarthy's tactics of witch hunting and its impact on freedom of speech. As he put it "dissent is not disloyalty". IOW as usual, the direct opposite of this comic book
fantasy of yours.
So, history has shown that McCarthy was 100% correct, that those he accused were in fact Soviet spies. But facts don't matter, only party. I mean, treason isn't a problem, you have a party to promote and protect.
The fact is that the "witch hunt" was conducted by Murrow against McCarthy for the purpose of distracting from the now irrefutable fact that the Truman Administration was full of Soviet operatives. Murrow was used to create a shit storm against McCarthy, not just to destroy the factual investigation underway, but also as warning that should anyone dare expose the connection between the party and the Soviets, they too would experience the destruction of their lives by Herr Goebbels and his managed media. Murrow learned well from his mentor.
Yawn, fabricated haughtiness by yet another Bolshevik who is far too intellectual to soil himself with the television. Laughable bullshit, at best.
Slander and libel are similar - but only a dolt claims they are the same thing.
So, you'll be putting a rebuttal section on Madcow, Matthews, Jon Stewart, et al. any day now, right Comrade?
Oh, this is ONLY about talk radio, since the rest of the media is comfortably in party hands. I mean, the goal is the censor the right, not offer opposing views on, well "The View."
ROFL
You authoritarians would be a hoot, if not for the forced labor prisons, death camps, and armed thugs you bring along with you.
Not at all, Red Lion dealt with a single broadcast carried across multiple affiliates. A vastly different issue than 300 local Apparatchiks independently reading the script and ad libbing the views Murrow and the party provided them.
Utter bullshit, as you well know. If the goal were alternative voices, then "mission accomplished" - but here you are demanding that conservative voices be censored. So clearly your goal is to silence ideas contrary to the message of the party.
Which is why Eisenhower, a left wing Republican, represented the alternative to the democrats. Eisenhower was the epitome of big government excess.
What the **** does any of that mean? Who brought up these cable people and what do they have to do with anything? You keep trying to derail the subject why? Because you're floating obvious contradictions and want to get the spotlight off them, that's why. Didn't work before, doesn't work now, and won't work in the future.
Right, because you only seek to silence radio. TV already is fully controlled by the party - no need for a change there.
Good luck with learning English. As has been the case since the beginning of the thread, a lot of cheap bullshit self-contradictory claims offering no foundation whatsoever except paranoid fantasies of "everybody's against me". Not in the least impressed.
What reason do you have for seeking to censor radio?
If you bleat "equal time," then support your nonsense by demonstrating that the left, with CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS has LESS hours per week to further the agenda of the party than the right does on talk radio to oppose the agenda of the party.
