Next 3-4 Weeks Will Be Explosive

[meaner gene]

This is not about how gullible Americans are, we already know that. Russia, Russia, Russia.

Let me repeat your "proof" claim.

The fraud has been proven. 55% of likely voters believe the election was stole

You said a poll of 55% gullible proved your claim.

You can deny saying it, or just ignore your last lie.

 

[Zincwarrior]

You forgot to mention the mole people.

View attachment 498401

I remember that movie

Try keeping up moron.

So that means there's no case and this thread is a lie? To prove something it has to be scientifically proven or win at court. Has either happened?

 

[Lastamender]

It was their burden to prove their claims. 4 million minutes of video and not one single person shown depositing ballots at multiple drop boxes.

It is their burden to prove Phillips is wrong.

 

[Lastamender]

I remember that movie

So that means there's no case and this thread is a lie? To prove something it has to be scientifically proven or win at court. Has either happened?

You cannot win when a court will not hear evidence.

 

[Faun]

2,000 Mules caught the fraud. Fact. Irrefutable digital evidence says so.

LOLOL

It's been refuted.

 

[Lastamender]

LOLOL

It's been refuted.

Prove it. Who else has looked at that data? It is the only way to refute it. That has not and will not happen. Why is that?

 

[Faun]

It is their burden to prove Phillips is wrong.

LOLOL

No, that's no one else's burden. The burden of proof is on the claimant. Phillips claims 54,000 "mules" illegally dropped of multiple ballots at multiple drop boxes but despite claiming he had 4 million minutes of video, he showed zero instances of anybody doing that. Not one. So we're just supposed to believe him. You know, believe the word of the same guy who lied about 3 million non-citizens voting in 2016.

 

[Faun]

Prove it. Who else has looked at that data? It is the only way to refute it. That has not and will not happen. Why is that?

It's been proven by Phillips presenting zero videos of anybody doing what he claimed 54,000 people did.

 

[Faun]

You cannot win when a court will not hear evidence.

No evidence has been brought to court.

 

[meaner gene]

It was their burden to prove their claims. 4 million minutes of video and not one single person shown depositing ballots at multiple drop boxes.

They had just a fraction of that much video from January 6th, and it proved how hundreds of people broke the law.

Nobody would use a cellphone ping of somebody within 100 feet of the halls of congress on that day being proof of anything.

 

[Soupnazi630]

He is very credible. Why don't you get someone to look at the data and debunk it? Because it cannot be debunked. They got caught.

It cannot be debunked because it is vague, inconclusive and shows no evidence of fraud or theft.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Then the SCOTUS and the NYT are wrong? That is what you are claiming. Plus even 100 feet away from 30 or 40 drop boxes for days is quite suspicious and warrants a full investigation. Right?

No.

The NYT is in fact very often wrong. The USSC does not agree with you aqqnd it warrants no investigation.

 

[Soupnazi630]

They had just a fraction of that much video from January 6th, and it proved how hundreds of people broke the law.

Nobody would use a cellphone ping of somebody within 100 feet of the halls of congress on that day being proof of anything.

No it did not.

They ahd to video clips, one of a man one of a woman eachmaking ONE trip to a ballot drpp box. These two videos show no one breaking the law.

They have no otrher video.

 

[meaner gene]

You cannot win when a court will not hear evidence.

Actually courts are mandated by law to hear evidence.
What they don't hear is speculation, suppositions, hearsay, and inuendo.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Then get the data and debunk it. Phillips paid for the data. Pony up, buy the data and debunk it. I'll wait.

Vague data which shows no conclusive evidence of anything illegal does not need to be debunked.

You need evidence to support your accusation of election fraud and you cannot post any.

 

[Faun]

Show the whole map and I will be glad to name the city.

I can only show what they showed....

... what city is that?

 

[meaner gene]

Prove it. Who else has looked at that data? It is the only way to refute it. That has not and will not happen. Why is that?

So what's stopping Trump from looking at the data?

 

[August West]

The Pennsylvania GOP won seats they haven`t held in 2 decades and the head of the party was quite pleased about the results, even though Trump lost Pa. How did the Pa. dems rig this election and why didn`t they make a clean sweep of it?

 

[Lastamender]

LOLOL

No, that's no one else's burden. The burden of proof is on the claimant. Phillips claims 54,000 "mules" illegally dropped of multiple ballots at multiple drop boxes but despite claiming he had 4 million minutes of video, he showed zero instances of anybody doing that. Not one. So we're just supposed to believe him. You know, believe the word of the same guy who lied about 3 million non-citizens voting in 2016.

I just told you they showed a black woman doing it. Stop lying.

 

[August West]

I can only show what they showed....

... what city is that?

A city where it`s not hard to find the red light district?