Newsom signs bill banning prosecutor from using "rap and hip hop lyrics" against criminal defendants

Bootney Lee Farnsworth

Diamond Member
Aug 15, 2017
46,062
29,790
2,615
Tejas

comment:

So, now prosecutors cannot use the violent murderous gangster words of defendants against them as they have in the past.

This illustrates exactly what we have been talking about. The thug culture that has overtaken the black community glorifies criminal violent behavior AND EVERYBODY KNOWS IT, but now Gavvy wants to protect thugs because they are Black.

Can we all agree that this is not a gun problem?
 

comment:

So, now prosecutors cannot use the violent murderous gangster words of defendants against them as they have in the past.

This illustrates exactly what we have been talking about. The thug culture that has overtaken the black community glorifies criminal violent behavior AND EVERYBODY KNOWS IT, but now Gavvy wants to protect thugs because they are Black.

Can we all agree that this is not a gun problem?
Wrong.

As noted in the other thread on the topic: placing a greater burden on the state to the benefit of freedom and individual liberty – particularly when it comes to taking from a citizen his freedom, is a good thing.

The measure doesn’t prohibit the use of song lyrics as evidence against a defendant; rather, it requires a separate hearing to explore the merits of using song lyrics as evidence, and the state failing to make its case, the evidence will be excluded.

Moreover, the measure contributes to the benefit of the legal system, ensuring prosecution is justified and warranted, sparing the legal system the disgrace of wrongful prosecution and conviction, and giving legitimacy to the verdict should the defendant be convicted.

Consequently, attempts to vilify Governor Newsom are wrongheaded and meritless.
 
Wrong.

As noted in the other thread on the topic: placing a greater burden on the state to the benefit of freedom and individual liberty – particularly when it comes to taking from a citizen his freedom, is a good thing.

The measure doesn’t prohibit the use of song lyrics as evidence against a defendant; rather, it requires a separate hearing to explore the merits of using song lyrics as evidence, and the state failing to make its case, the evidence will be excluded.

Moreover, the measure contributes to the benefit of the legal system, ensuring prosecution is justified and warranted, sparing the legal system the disgrace of wrongful prosecution and conviction, and giving legitimacy to the verdict should the defendant be convicted.

Consequently, attempts to vilify Governor Newsom are wrongheaded and meritless.
But you have no problem preemptively infringing on gun rights.
 
Calling rap lyrics evidence of a crime is like claiming that Vicki Lawrence confessed to murder when she sang The Night The Lights Went Out In Georgia.
 
Calling rap lyrics evidence of a crime is like claiming that Vicki Lawrence confessed to murder when she sang The Night The Lights Went Out In Georgia.
I always wondered why the lights went out when they hung him in the song. Doesn't that only happen when they use the electric chair?
 

comment:

So, now prosecutors cannot use the violent murderous gangster words of defendants against them as they have in the past.

This illustrates exactly what we have been talking about. The thug culture that has overtaken the black community glorifies criminal violent behavior AND EVERYBODY KNOWS IT, but now Gavvy wants to protect thugs because they are Black.

Can we all agree that this is not a gun problem?
Geeeeeeeee, I wonder why crime rates continue to soar? Can't quite put my finger on it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top