Newsom lies, claims Trump never called him. Trump shows phone record with 16 minute call to Newsom

[Etymology gaslight]

Okay I had
my news division put this together.

Here it is



See new posts
Conversation
WashingtonAmerica.Net
@WADailyNews
ANALYSIS: THE TRUMP-NEWSOM CALL LOG DISPUTE (JUNE 2025)

A Clash of Egos, Federal Power, and Political Theater

1. The Timeline of Events
June 6, 2025: Federal immigration raids in LA spark violent protests.
June 7, 2025:
1:22 AM: Trump calls Newsom (4 sec, unanswered).
1:23 AM: Trump calls again (16 min convo).
Trump claims he told Newsom to "get his ass in gear" on riots.
Newsom later says call was "cordial," no mention of troops.
June 8, 2025: Newsom acknowledges June 7 call on MSNBC.
June 9, 2025: Trump falsely claims he spoke to Newsom "a day ago" (implying June 8).
June 10, 2025**:
Newsom denies a June 9 call, tweets: "No call. Not even a voicemail."
Trump releases call log proving June 7 call.
June 13, 2025: Federal judge sides with Newsom, but appeals court blocks.

2. The Core Dispute
Trump claimed he warned Newsom to stop the riots, but Newsom countered that Trump never mentioned deploying troops during their call. Trump then accused Newsom of lying about the call altogether, while Newsom clarified that he had denied a call on June 9—not June 7, which had indeed taken place. As Trump defended his use of federal troops as necessary to restore order, Newsom fired back, calling it an illegal power grab that violated state authority.

THE BIGGER PICTURE
1. Federal vs. State Power
Trump’s Move: Deploying Marines/National Guard without state consent tests the Insurrection Act.
Newsom’s Lawsuit: Argues Trump violated states’ rights (echoes of Civil War-era federalism battles).

2. 2028 Presidential Preview
Newsom = Democratic frontrunner, using this to boost anti-Trump credentials.
Trump = Flexing "law and order" image for his base.

3. Media Manipulation
Trump’s Tactics:
Overstate urgency ("Newsom ignored me!").
"Proof" of call log distracts from illegal troop deployment.
Newsom’s Tactics:
Pretend Trump is "confused" (mental fitness narrative).
Use legal battles to paint Trump as a dictator.

Trump’s Legal Ground
Insurrection Act (1807): Allows federal troops **if state fails to act.
Problem: No evidence Newsom refused to act—just wasn’t fast enough for Trump.

Newsom’s Legal Ground
Posse Comitatus Act (1878): Limits federal military use **in domestic policing.
10th Amendment: States control their National Guard unless federalized.

Prediction: Courts may side with Newsom, but Trump could delay until riots end.

Public Opinion — Who Came Out on Top?

Trump’s base sees it as proof of Newsom’s lies and applauds Trump’s tough stance.
Democrats say Trump overstepped, calling it a dictator move.
Neutrals think both leaders are playing politics while LA suffers.

Quick Win: Trump looks strong and in charge.
Long Game: Newsom could win if courts back him.

1. Appeals Court Fight: Will feds keep control of CA National Guard?
2. More Protests: If raids continue, unrest spreads.
3. 2028 Campaign Ads: This incident will be replayed endlessly.

Trump exaggerated (lied about June 9 call) but had proof of June 7 call.
Newsom played semantics (denied wrong call date) but has legal merit.
Real Losers: LA residents caught in political crossfire.

Bottom Line: This isn’t about a phone call—it’s about who controls America’s streets.

And the fight has just begun.


From
WashingtonAmerica.Net

 

[struth]

Now you're moving goal posts.
So gruesome saying "there was no call. not even a voicemail" now means (to you) that gruesome "is obviously not saying he never spoke to Trump on the phone"
What does "there was no call" mean?
What does "not even a voicemail" mean?
According to gruesome there was no call or voicemail.
Sheesh

Moving goal post is all the dembots can do

 

[Etymology gaslight]

Moving goal post is all the dembots can do

Trump has the football.
Figuratively and literally.

 

[AntonToo]

Why do you think they issued a stay then?

To prevent the yanking of the troops back and forth between Newsom and Trump while the matter is finalized in courts.

That is very different from overturning the original judgement.

 

[struth]

To prevent the yanking of the troops back and forth between Newsom and Trump while the matter is finalized in courts.

So they are giving Trump what he wants

Do you know the factors the court considers when issuing a stay?

 

[AntonToo]

So they are giving Trump what he wants

What they are not giving is a disagreement with the original ruling.

What you've said about that is false.

 

[struth]

What they are not giving is a disagreement with the original ruling.

What you've said about that is false.

Of course it’s a disagreement, one of the main factors in issuing a stay, that the court considers is the likelihood the party has to win on appeal

They are sending a clear message the lower court is wrong

 

[AntonToo]

Of course it’s a disagreement

Because you say so?

Where is the text of the stay to support your empty claim?

Oh that's right, you don't have one, you just have your half-thoughts, daydreams and fantasies.

 

[Modern Messiah]

He said the all Trump claimed happened on Monday never happened

And it didn’t

Trump is as nutty as you

gruesome said "there was no call. not even a voicemail"
Do you understand how the English language works?
When someone says "there was no call. not even a voicemail" it means there was no call or voicemail.
There is no realistic way to misconstrue such a simple statement.
Yet you continue to get it wrong

 

[Etymology gaslight]

The governor is not taking my calls trying to get confirmation on his call log.

I have a 202 phone number so....
I also called the California Secretary of state's office no answer.

Both calls I left a voicemail.

 

[Modern Messiah]

When did Trump say he called him?

President Trump presented the phone time log that showed a 16 minute conversation with gruesome.
gruesome said "there was no phone call. not even a voicemail"
Someone is lying and I am definitely going to believe the official phone records over gruesome

 

[Marener]

President Trump presented the phone time log that showed a 16 minute conversation with gruesome.
gruesome said "there was no phone call. not even a voicemail"
Someone is lying and I am definitely going to believe the official phone records over gruesome

Newsom was responding to Trump’s claim that he called Newsom on June 9th.

But he didn’t. Did he.

 

[Modern Messiah]

That’s a lie.

Nope.
gruesome was quoted as saying "there was no call. not even a voicemail"
You're so backwards in all of this that you are now literally calling gruesome a liar.
Well sir, I concur

 

[Etymology gaslight]

Nope.
gruesome was quoted as saying "there was no call. not even a voicemail"
You're so backwards in all of this that you are now literally calling gruesome a liar.
Well sir, I concur

This is also why they have to steal elections.

 

[Etymology gaslight]

Newsom was responding to Trump’s claim that he called Newsom on June 9th.

But he didn’t. Did he.

You're still morphing.
If I could show you a video where Gavin newsom says we talked for 20 minutes would that help ?
Because I'm pretty sure that's upthread.

If anybody finds the governor's call log before I do please post it.

 

[Marener]

Nope.
gruesome was quoted as saying "there was no call. not even a voicemail"
You're so backwards in all of this that you are now literally calling gruesome a liar.
Well sir, I concur

Where did he say “never”?

 

[Modern Messiah]

Newsom was responding to Trump’s claim that he called Newsom on June 9th.

But he didn’t. Did he.

For the thousandth time gruesome said
"there was no call. not even a voicemail"
that is a fairly direct statement that would be difficult to misunderstand.
When an individual says "there was no call"
that usually means there was not a call.
President Trump did call gruesome.
It was proven with the phone logs.
Therefore gruesome is lying again.
You can flounder deep in the weeds all you want.
gruesome lied.

 

[Marener]

You're still morphing.
If I could show you a video where Gavin newsom says we talked for 20 minutes would that help ?
Because I'm pretty sure that's upthread.

If anybody finds the governor's call log before I do please post it.

Newsom had acknowledged the June 7th phone call in previous interviews.

But Trump claimed they talked on June 9th, which is a lie. That’s what Newsom was responding to.

 

[Marener]

For the thousandth time gruesome said
"there was no call. not even a voicemail"
that is a fairly direct statement that would be difficult to misunderstand.
When an individual says "there was no call"
that usually means there was not a call.
President Trump did call gruesome.
It was proven with the phone logs.
Therefore gruesome is lying again.
You can flounder deep in the weeds all you want.
gruesome lied.

Context matters.

Newsom was directly responding to Trump’s claim that he called him on June 9th. There was no phone call on June 9th.

 

[Etymology gaslight]

Context matters.

Newsom was directly responding to Trump’s claim that he called him on June 9th. There was no phone call on June 9th.

Morph.
Not even a voicemail,
From the president of the United States.

I'll reserve judgment until I see the governor's call log.

I do reset it
I do remember Gavin saying
We never talked for 16 minutes on June 9th.

If only the California governor's office kept a log of phone calls from the White House
this would be so easy.

But hey that's California that's Hollywood.