Newly Elected Congresswoman Who Grew Up in Soviet Ukraine Gives Stark Warning About Socialism

[danielpalos]

Solving simple poverty means more people paying more taxes.

Why do you feel it's your mission to solve "simple poverty"? Virtue signaling?
The solution already exists for those motivated to apply it.

It promotes the general welfare; we should have no homeless in our first world economy.

 

[danielpalos]

I believe the words of someone who has suffered the state policies of a socialist nation more than any utopian minded American liberal. Liberals here are too stupid to believe what these people say about how socialism turns out for the common man.

What a difference a Constitution makes. Right wingers are merely indulging the fallacy of red herring not the discovery of sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation.

There was nothing preventing the former Soviet Union from automating to increase productivity.

Bread tractors for the People; socializing costs is what socialism is good for!

 

[Orangecat]

It promotes the general welfare; we should have no homeless in our first world economy.

We have the greatest accumulated debt in human history. Sorry, you'll have to learn to generate an income on your own.

 

[Theowl32]

It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.

Newly Elected GOP Rep Who Grew Up in Soviet Union Gives Stark Warning About Socialism

This is a vantage point fashionable socialists like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez could probably never understand.

www.westernjournal.com

BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”

We have received dire warnings from Cubans who escaped, Venezuelans who have escaped, millions of Chinese who escaped, ex KGB agents who have testimony and the free spoiled American trust funders giggle at all of it like TaxMan laughing at your post.

We allow the traitors and heathens to spread their crap. So, we reap what we sow.

 

[Billiejeens]

It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.

Newly Elected GOP Rep Who Grew Up in Soviet Union Gives Stark Warning About Socialism

This is a vantage point fashionable socialists like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez could probably never understand.

www.westernjournal.com

BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”

We have received dire warnings from Cubans who escaped, Venezuelans who have escaped, millions of Chinese who escaped, ex KGB agents who have testimony and the free spoiled American trust funders giggle at all of it like TaxMan laughing at your post.

We allow the traitors and heathens to spread their crap. So, we reap what we sow.

At some point we have to decide to plant them
Maybe this is the point.

 

[Billiejeens]

Solving simple poverty means more people paying more taxes.

Why do you feel it's your mission to solve "simple poverty"? Virtue signaling?
The solution already exists for those motivated to apply it.

It promotes the general welfare; we should have no homeless in our first world economy.

I just don't think that this is the country for you

 

[Zorro!]

It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.

Newly Elected GOP Rep Who Grew Up in Soviet Union Gives Stark Warning About Socialism

This is a vantage point fashionable socialists like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez could probably never understand.

www.westernjournal.com

BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”

What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.

Democrats are pushing to pack the Supreme Court. Democrats want to legislate by using the Supreme Court. Democrats will destroy our system if given the chance. Useful idiots, all of you.

The Supreme Court has already been "packed" by Republicans. This is also true of all of the Appeals Courts throughout the nation. Mitch McConnell has spent the last 10 years refusing to approve minorities or women to the courts, and has spent his time packing the courts with hard right conservatives picked by the Federalist Society, which is financed by Dark Money sources, who have poured donated $17 million towards the promotion of their preferred candidates in both the cases of the Coney-Barrett nomination and the Kavenaugh nomination.

It is criticial to know who this money is coming from and why they're investing so heavily in the courts, turning them both white and male, as well as conservative. Not a good look.

Just a warning, if you intend to pursue this line of bullshit that Democrats are planning on "packing" the courts, you're going to have to deal with the push back against the Dark Money behind the long goal plan of 10 years of court packing by the Republican Party under Mitch McConnell.

McConnell sold the entire nation down the river to accomplish this court packing goal, and it is a far more serious problem that you don't even know who was behind it, than you may realize.

The Supreme Court has already been "packed" by Republicans

I stopped right there.
That's a no.

Fake

It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.

Newly Elected GOP Rep Who Grew Up in Soviet Union Gives Stark Warning About Socialism

This is a vantage point fashionable socialists like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez could probably never understand.

www.westernjournal.com

BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”

What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.

Democrats are pushing to pack the Supreme Court. Democrats want to legislate by using the Supreme Court. Democrats will destroy our system if given the chance. Useful idiots, all of you.

The Supreme Court has already been "packed" by Republicans. This is also true of all of the Appeals Courts throughout the nation. Mitch McConnell has spent the last 10 years refusing to approve minorities or women to the courts, and has spent his time packing the courts with hard right conservatives picked by the Federalist Society, which is financed by Dark Money sources, who have poured donated $17 million towards the promotion of their preferred candidates in both the cases of the Coney-Barrett nomination and the Kavenaugh nomination.

It is criticial to know who this money is coming from and why they're investing so heavily in the courts, turning them both white and male, as well as conservative. Not a good look.

Just a warning, if you intend to pursue this line of bullshit that Democrats are planning on "packing" the courts, you're going to have to deal with the push back against the Dark Money behind the long goal plan of 10 years of court packing by the Republican Party under Mitch McConnell.

McConnell sold the entire nation down the river to accomplish this court packing goal, and it is a far more serious problem that you don't even know who was behind it, than you may realize.

The Supreme Court has already been "packed" by Republicans

I stopped right there.
That's a no.

Fake News. The normal rotation of justices on vacancy is not "packing". Destroying the independence of the court by adding seats in order to get particular judicial outcomes is one of Democrats most destructive notions in the last 90 years, since the last time they came up with this vicious attack on the Separation of Powers that secures our Freedom and Liberty.

 

[hadit]

Only the general warfare is good for the right wing not the general welfare.

What's with all the idiot-babble you're posting today?

It is every day. Ask him how much of your hard earned monies someone else is entitled to and watch him run away. He cannot answer that question. Doesn't compute.

If the rich can't do it with private charity it must be an obligation of Government. And, you merely have nothing but special pleading. Why not create an investment fund to help fund the general welfare under our form of Capitalism?

Capitalism, what is That sayeth the Right Wing every time it comes up.

An investment fund wouldn't be nearly big enough to even touch the welfare you want. There's just not enough money to give everyone a guaranteed $5/hr subsidy for smoking pot in Mom's basement. I've given you the numbers on this, it's not my problem you don't know how numbers work.

I agree to disagree. Solving simple poverty means more people circulating capital and paying more taxes. The Poor should have the opportunity to pay their share of the tax burden.

If you disagree, show me the numbers.

Solving simple poverty means more people paying more taxes. Why do you believe your taxes would go up and not down with more people paying more taxes?

No, you're not off the hook that easy. You said an investment fund would help fund welfare. I challenge you to find out how much money we would need to pay everyone who does not work $15/hr. That's your tax, and it has nothing to do with whether my taxes would go up or down. Show me the numbers.

Last time I went over this with some math guys, it was around three trillion dollars to solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

And, raising the minimum wage to fifteen dollars an hour generates over nine times more in federal income tax revenue from that one individual than someone earning the current federal minimum wage.

So, where do you think that three trillion EVERY YEAR is going to come from? It's not coming from the wealthy because there just isn't that much wealth, and if you tried to get it you would get only a part and that only once. And give up your blargle already. "solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States" is a meaningless phrase. It literally means nothing, so stop repeating it like it's significant. Next, you want to double the MW and pretend it won't put a LOT of people out of work which totally negates any new tax revenue.

Let's go back to that example you didn't want to deal with. If you want a whole lot more tax revenue, why not just set the MW at $100/hr and be done with it? That would generate a whole lot more taxes than a paltry $15/hr, wouldn't it? Answer honestly.

Next, what is the purpose of a job? Hint, it is not to generate tax revenue.

 

[hadit]

Why not create opportunities for people to earn monies vs. be given monies?

In an at-will employment State? Right wingers complain about our general welfare clause being too general.

At will also means one can leave at any time to earn more vs. stuck.

Yes, so right wingers should not complain about taxes, just get a better job.

So, Daniel, how much of our income ARE you entitled to take? Give a number. Break it down for us. How much are you entitled to take for weed? How much to fix up Mom's basement? How much for pizza delivery? We need to know how much you're legally and morally entitled to take.

Nobody is making you work in our at-will employment States. And, you simply are not making enough if taxes bother you. Simply improve your lot and get a better job; it is not just the Poor can benefit from that.

That's not a number. You seem to think you're entitled to a portion of my earnings, tell us how much.

You don't have to work, slavery was abolished. You have no basis to complain about taxes.

How much of what I earn are you entitled to take? It's a simple question. If someone is holding a gun to my head and demanding my wallet, it hardly matters whether there's $5 or $500 in it, does it?

How about what it costs to run our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. Abolish those, since you don't want to pay war time tax rates for them, and it could cover actually promoting the general welfare by solving simple poverty in our at-will employment States.

That's irrelevant. It's clear that you have no idea how much of my income you are entitled to take to keep you supplied with pizza and pot, so I'll supply your answer for you. You want "more". No matter how much you get now, you just want more.

Basically, you're just saying we should cut things you don't like out of the budget so we could fund things you do like. Nice sentiment, but we already have a trillion dollar deficit, and moving the deck chairs around isn't going to help. What you're going to have to do is cut across the board and not generate any new spending.

 

[busybee01]

She has no clue what she is talking about. Republicans pulled a even bigger con than Trump did on Americans. The Democrats are not pushing socialism.

Holy crap! What a massive amazing lie!

Why should a young person have to go deep into debt for a college education?

Blame the colleges for consistently jacking up their tuition costs. Cars cost something. Houses cost something.
Food costs, etc. Why should college be free?
Well, it will only be free to little Betty who wants her worthless college degree in liberal arts. Everyone else is being asked to make her education cost nothing!

Should peopole die because they can't afford the hospital bills?

NO ONE is denied medical
services due to income. Stop lying.

Helping people is not socialism. It is common decency. For this *****, if you are muiddle class or poor, her message is "drop dead."

You start this post by lying about democrats and socialism and by the end you make an appeal
for it. You are a pathetic dope.

The Democrats are not pushing socialism. That is a fact. You are rthe one who is the massive liar.

Public colleges have seen a steady erosion in the level of support they get from states. Many years ago college was either free or inexpensive. Today you can go tens of thousands of dollars in debt. That will have a affect on the economy. It will slow the economy down as they are unable to start families or buy houses.

We can't have free healthcare. The fact is that Obamacare is a reasonable step. Biden wants to offer a medicare for all option. It also allows insurance companies to compete.

The fact is that liberals are right in terms of the issues facing this country. We need to start compromising or this country is in big trouble. Look at what happened in Florida. A initiative to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour got more votes than either Biden or Trump.

You need to read something outside MSNBC and CNN. Good grief you are naïve.

Y&ou are the one who is stupid. You need to listen to something other than Trump.

 

[busybee01]

I believe the words of someone who has suffered the state policies of a socialist nation more than any utopian minded American liberal. Liberals here are too stupid to believe what these people say about how socialism turns out for the common man.

No major party is talking about socialism.

 

[busybee01]

She has no clue what she is talking about. Republicans pulled a even bigger con than Trump did on Americans. The Democrats are not pushing socialism.

Holy crap! What a massive amazing lie!

Why should a young person have to go deep into debt for a college education?

Blame the colleges for consistently jacking up their tuition costs. Cars cost something. Houses cost something.
Food costs, etc. Why should college be free?
Well, it will only be free to little Betty who wants her worthless college degree in liberal arts. Everyone else is being asked to make her education cost nothing!

Should peopole die because they can't afford the hospital bills?

NO ONE is denied medical
services due to income. Stop lying.

Helping people is not socialism. It is common decency. For this *****, if you are muiddle class or poor, her message is "drop dead."

You start this post by lying about democrats and socialism and by the end you make an appeal
for it. You are a pathetic dope.

The Democrats are not pushing socialism. That is a fact. You are rthe one who is the massive liar.

Public colleges have seen a steady erosion in the level of support they get from states. Many years ago college was either free or inexpensive. Today you can go tens of thousands of dollars in debt. That will have a affect on the economy. It will slow the economy down as they are unable to start families or buy houses.

We can't have free healthcare. The fact is that Obamacare is a reasonable step. Biden wants to offer a medicare for all option. It also allows insurance companies to compete.

The fact is that liberals are right in terms of the issues facing this country. We need to start compromising or this country is in big trouble. Look at what happened in Florida. A initiative to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour got more votes than either Biden or Trump.

"Many years ago college was either free or inexpensive."

When, Oldtimer?

You really are empty headed.

 

[BlackSand]

What a difference a Constitution makes. Right wingers are merely indulging the fallacy of red herring not the discovery of sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation.

There was nothing preventing the former Soviet Union from automating to increase productivity.

Bread tractors for the People; socializing costs is what socialism is good for!

You posted a commercial where they are utilizing Capitalism and trying to sell their products to farmers here.
Fendt is worldwide brand of AGCO which is based in Duluth, Georgia.

.

 

[danielpalos]

It promotes the general welfare; we should have no homeless in our first world economy.

We have the greatest accumulated debt in human history. Sorry, you'll have to learn to generate an income on your own.

Abolish your expensive and useless and alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. There is no general warfare clause in our federal Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

Solving simple poverty means more people paying more taxes.

Why do you feel it's your mission to solve "simple poverty"? Virtue signaling?
The solution already exists for those motivated to apply it.

It promotes the general welfare; we should have no homeless in our first world economy.

I just don't think that this is the country for you

lol. Like you would know. Parler misses you.

 

[danielpalos]

So, where do you think that three trillion EVERY YEAR is going to come from? It's not coming from the wealthy because there just isn't that much wealth, and if you tried to get it you would get only a part and that only once. And give up your blargle already. "solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States" is a meaningless phrase. It literally means nothing, so stop repeating it like it's significant. Next, you want to double the MW and pretend it won't put a LOT of people out of work which totally negates any new tax revenue.

Let's go back to that example you didn't want to deal with. If you want a whole lot more tax revenue, why not just set the MW at $100/hr and be done with it? That would generate a whole lot more taxes than a paltry $15/hr, wouldn't it? Answer honestly.

Next, what is the purpose of a job? Hint, it is not to generate tax revenue.

Current revenues are around 3.3 trillion now. We have a central bank and subscribe to Capitalism. We just need to invest the money and let the multiplier do the rest. Unemployment compensation under our current regime has been measured at 2. Meaning that for every dollar invested two dollars in economic activity is generated.

 

[danielpalos]

Why not create opportunities for people to earn monies vs. be given monies?

In an at-will employment State? Right wingers complain about our general welfare clause being too general.

At will also means one can leave at any time to earn more vs. stuck.

Yes, so right wingers should not complain about taxes, just get a better job.

So, Daniel, how much of our income ARE you entitled to take? Give a number. Break it down for us. How much are you entitled to take for weed? How much to fix up Mom's basement? How much for pizza delivery? We need to know how much you're legally and morally entitled to take.

Nobody is making you work in our at-will employment States. And, you simply are not making enough if taxes bother you. Simply improve your lot and get a better job; it is not just the Poor can benefit from that.

That's not a number. You seem to think you're entitled to a portion of my earnings, tell us how much.

You don't have to work, slavery was abolished. You have no basis to complain about taxes.

How much of what I earn are you entitled to take? It's a simple question. If someone is holding a gun to my head and demanding my wallet, it hardly matters whether there's $5 or $500 in it, does it?

How about what it costs to run our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. Abolish those, since you don't want to pay war time tax rates for them, and it could cover actually promoting the general welfare by solving simple poverty in our at-will employment States.

That's irrelevant. It's clear that you have no idea how much of my income you are entitled to take to keep you supplied with pizza and pot, so I'll supply your answer for you. You want "more". No matter how much you get now, you just want more.

Basically, you're just saying we should cut things you don't like out of the budget so we could fund things you do like. Nice sentiment, but we already have a trillion dollar deficit, and moving the deck chairs around isn't going to help. What you're going to have to do is cut across the board and not generate any new spending.

Not at all. Our welfare clause is general and we should have no homeless in our first world economy.

 

[Orangecat]

"solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States" is a meaningless phrase. It literally means nothing, so stop repeating it like it's significant.

 

[danielpalos]

"solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States" is a meaningless phrase. It literally means nothing, so stop repeating it like it's significant.

View attachment 418219

Parler misses you.

 

[Orangecat]

Abolish your expensive and useless and alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. There is no general warfare clause in our federal Constitution.

We aren't waging war on any of those things.
We establish laws and punish those caught breaking them.
Your tactics here are just bumper-sticker deep sloganeering, tbh.