Newest Science: "Sex Classification Is Harmful"

[Norman]

If you are wondering why they need to send millions and millions of dollars to gender research in Pakistan, the answer is simple. The bonobos have not yet figured out that the correct answer is two.

Last Thursday, the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), widely considered to be the world’s most prestigious medical journal, published an article entitled Failed Assignments—Rethinking Sex Designations on Birth Certificates, arguing that (in the words of the abstract) “sex designations on birth certificates offer no clinical utility, and they can be harmful for intersex and transgender people.” The resemblance to Titania McGrath’s 2018-era Twitter feed is uncanny. Two of the authors are doctors. The third, Jessica A. Clarke, is a law school professor who seeks to remake our legal system so as to “recognize nonbinary gender identities or eliminate unnecessary legal sex classifications.”

The very idea of “a dichotomous sex-classification system” is dubious, the authors believe. And even if such a system were preserved, they write, it should be based “on self-identification at an older age, rather than on a medical evaluation at birth.” Sex designations on birth certificates, it is argued, “offer no clinical utility; they serve only legal—not medical—goals.”

On Sex and Gender, The New England Journal of Medicine Has Abandoned Its Scientific Mission

The very idea of “a dichotomous sex-classification system” is dubious, the authors believe.

quillette.com

 

[Circe]

The very idea of “a dichotomous sex-classification system” is dubious, the authors believe. And even if such a system were preserved, they write, it should be based “on self-identification at an older age, rather than on a medical evaluation at birth.” Sex designations on birth certificates, it is argued, “offer no clinical utility; they serve only legal—not medical—goals.”

See, This is why we should "follow the science."

This makes about as much sense as the so-called "science" on COVID.

 

[Norman]

The very idea of “a dichotomous sex-classification system” is dubious, the authors believe. And even if such a system were preserved, they write, it should be based “on self-identification at an older age, rather than on a medical evaluation at birth.” Sex designations on birth certificates, it is argued, “offer no clinical utility; they serve only legal—not medical—goals.”

See, This is why we should "follow the science."

This makes about as much sense as the so-called "science" on COVID.

Both fictions are made by the same authors, it is hardly surprising.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

This makes about as much sense as the so-called "science" on COVID.

Oh, come on. EVERYBODY knows that covid is a virus so smart that it will surely strike you dead if you try to eat at a small sit down restaraunt or get your hair cut, but knows not to bother you if you are shopping at walmart or working at an Amazon distribution center.

 

[Norman]

This makes about as much sense as the so-called "science" on COVID.

Oh, come on. EVERYBODY knows that covid is a virus so smart that it will surely strike you dead if you try to eat at a small sit down restaraunt or get your hair cut, but knows not to bother you if you are shopping at walmart or working at an Amazon distribution center.

Amazon owner is a billionaire. The virus does not affect properties owned by billionaires, especially democrat billionaires. Follow the science!

 

[justinacolmena]

Oh, come on. EVERYBODY knows that covid is a virus so smart that it will surely strike you dead if you try to eat at a small sit down restaraunt or get your hair cut, but knows not to bother you if you are shopping at walmart or working at an Amazon distribution center.

You will lose your own life if you don't lose the deepfake gif.

 

[justinacolmena]

>>>Failed Assignments — Rethinking Sex Designations on Birth Certificates
List of authors. Vadim M. Shteyler, M.D., Jessica A. Clarke, J.D., and Eli Y. Adashi, M.D

It's a threesome of masturbating OB/GYN doctors.

Sex designations on birth certificates offer no clinical utility, and they can be harmful for intersex and transgender people.

And if the infants are known to be intersex or transgender or to have malformed genital organs at the time of birth -- which is obviously the case here -- then how do the doctors justify committing their routine mayhem and butchery while withholding the correct and appropriate diagnosis and treatment?

Moving such designations below the line of demarcation wouldn’t compromise the birth certificate’s public health function but could avoid harm.

This sentence makes it clear that those doctors have nothing useful to help their patients. They will discuss a “line of demarcation” with respect to committing more or “less” harm to their patients -- but they are not willing to abstain from committing routine mayhem and mass murder upon their littlest of patients.

 

[Norman]

>>>Failed Assignments — Rethinking Sex Designations on Birth Certificates
List of authors. Vadim M. Shteyler, M.D., Jessica A. Clarke, J.D., and Eli Y. Adashi, M.D

It's a threesome of masturbating OB/GYN doctors.

Sex designations on birth certificates offer no clinical utility, and they can be harmful for intersex and transgender people.

And if the infants are known to be intersex or transgender or to have malformed genital organs at the time of birth -- which is obviously the case here -- then how do the doctors justify committing their routine mayhem and butchery while withholding the correct and appropriate diagnosis and treatment?

Moving such designations below the line of demarcation wouldn’t compromise the birth certificate’s public health function but could avoid harm.

This sentence makes it clear that those doctors have nothing useful to help their patients. They will discuss a “line of demarcation” with respect to committing more or “less” harm to their patients -- but they are not willing to abstain from committing routine mayhem and mass murder upon their littlest of patients.

I think we need a test at birth to determine whether a baby is transgendered.

Chopping of the genitals right then and there seems a lot less wasteful and the baby won't have to go through living as the wrong gender.

 

[Polishprince]

>>>Failed Assignments — Rethinking Sex Designations on Birth Certificates
List of authors. Vadim M. Shteyler, M.D., Jessica A. Clarke, J.D., and Eli Y. Adashi, M.D

It's a threesome of masturbating OB/GYN doctors.

Sex designations on birth certificates offer no clinical utility, and they can be harmful for intersex and transgender people.

And if the infants are known to be intersex or transgender or to have malformed genital organs at the time of birth -- which is obviously the case here -- then how do the doctors justify committing their routine mayhem and butchery while withholding the correct and appropriate diagnosis and treatment?

Moving such designations below the line of demarcation wouldn’t compromise the birth certificate’s public health function but could avoid harm.

This sentence makes it clear that those doctors have nothing useful to help their patients. They will discuss a “line of demarcation” with respect to committing more or “less” harm to their patients -- but they are not willing to abstain from committing routine mayhem and mass murder upon their littlest of patients.

I think we need a test at birth to determine whether a baby is transgendered.

Chopping of the genitals right then and there seems a lot less wasteful and the baby won't have to go through living as the wrong gender.

The way I look at it is this.

If an adult has lived life, and decides on his own to switcheroo and get dressed up in full female regalia, standing on a street corner or at a highway rest stop, pretending to be a broad, that's his own affair.

Who is he bothering?

When I was a young man, the pimps , johns, hoes, trannies, she-males, etc., were all hanging out together in their Red Light Community. They really didn't force themselves on the normative folks. Stay out of the seedy areas late at night, you'd never notice them.

But when they promote children and encourage them to become LGBTQ+, that's just a bridge too far.

 

[justinacolmena]

I think we need a test at birth to determine whether a baby is transgendered.

Which would be a very rare event, if it weren't the doctors themselves who transgendered the baby yet in the womb.

Chopping of the genitals right then and there seems a lot less wasteful and the baby won't have to go through living as the wrong gender.

No that is no less wasteful, and no less harmful, but that is the harm they insist on inflicting to their littlest of patients under modern universal healthcare. Doctors don't make a living doctoring healthy people, so they have to find a way at the time of birth or earlier to make people as sick and dependent on them as possible for life.

 

[justinacolmena]

The way I look at it is this.

If an adult has lived life, and decides on his own to switcheroo and get dressed up in full female regalia, standing on a street corner or at a highway rest stop, pretending to be a broad, that's his own affair.

Who is he bothering?

You are a serial rapist and a murderer, and patron of prostitutes and a john yourself. God damn you and your whole community of vice to hell, no matter how you cut your hair and dress nicely for church on Sunday and listen to the Realtor's sermon.

When I was a young man, the pimps , johns, hoes, trannies, she-males, etc., were all hanging out together in their Red Light Community. They really didn't force themselves on the normative folks. Stay out of the seedy areas late at night, you'd never notice them.

But when they promote children and encourage them to become LGBTQ+, that's just a bridge too far.

So you lived in sin for the pleasure of your own flesh, and you have tortured and mutilated the innocent ones. You are going to hell for all eternity, and you don't get to tell me what I have lived through or done or what has been done to me.

 

[jknowgood]

The very idea of “a dichotomous sex-classification system” is dubious, the authors believe. And even if such a system were preserved, they write, it should be based “on self-identification at an older age, rather than on a medical evaluation at birth.” Sex designations on birth certificates, it is argued, “offer no clinical utility; they serve only legal—not medical—goals.”

See, This is why we should "follow the science."

This makes about as much sense as the so-called "science" on COVID.

Liberals say they follow science, well science states there are only 2 genders.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Oh, come on. EVERYBODY knows that covid is a virus so smart that it will surely strike you dead if you try to eat at a small sit down restaraunt or get your hair cut, but knows not to bother you if you are shopping at walmart or working at an Amazon distribution center.

You will lose your own life if you don't lose the deepfake gif.

Yes, you are quite insane.

We have already discussed that