He was extradited to the United States to face criminal charges for his illegal gangland activitiesAgain, they do in their jurisdiction.
And yet Garcia was returned.
That had nothing to do with the immigration deportation order or the scotus ruling
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was extradited to the United States to face criminal charges for his illegal gangland activitiesAgain, they do in their jurisdiction.
And yet Garcia was returned.
He was extradited to the United States to face criminal charges for his illegal gangland activities
That had nothing to do with the immigration deportation order or the scotus ruling
The court's ruling is BS and I wasn't attacking you, not with violence like you assholes like to use, but with common-*******-sense.I'll note, you've went from addressing the courts ruling to a silly attack on me.
The court's ruling is BS and I wasn't attacking you, not with violence like you assholes like to use, but with common-*******-sense.
Something you've taken leave of I might add.
You and the truth are incongruent and incompatible, because the truth doesn't work in your little imaginary world.
Trump removed him to get rid of the problem....and the Dems, who simply resist anything rational Trump says or does, made total fools of themselves.He was extradited to the United States to face criminal charges for his illegal gangland activities
That had nothing to do with the immigration deportation order or the scotus ruling
The money we waste. A reason we are in decline.Again, they do in their jurisdiction.
And yet Garcia was returned.
The court ruling isn't a fact, dipshit, but purely a legal opinion that can easily be reversed on appeal.I can't recall threatening anyone.
if I was wrong you would simply stick to the facts of the courts rulings.
The court ruling isn't a fact, dipshit, but purely a legal opinion that can easily be reversed on appeal.
It's essentially an attempt by the left to control people they have no jurisdiction over.
NULL?Paragraph #3 of the OP.
WW
I went to a ob-gyn, and the form asked whether I was female, a male transgender, or binary.If I saw non-binary checked I'd automatically equate that with mental illness.
If they don't know what they are gender-wise then what else is wrong with them?
In my AO no gun shop will sell someone a gun that checks the non-binary box.
![]()
Well his indictments say soLol, if you say so. Lol
Well his indictments say so
That was never an issue, and stop acting like it ever was.I already pointed out the Supreme Court ruled that lower courts do have jurisdiction in their district.
WRONG. They recommended that he be returned.The court never ruled he had to be returned and released. Just that he had to be returned and the Supreme Court backed up that ruling saying the lower court indeed had jurisdiction to rule here.
You conveniently forget a lot of things.I can't recall threatening anyone.
if I was wrong you would simply stick to the facts of the courts rulings.
That was never an issue, and stop acting like it ever was.
It's like your insistence that MAGA is against immigration, yet you forget to mention that we're only against illegal immigration.
WRONG. They recommended that he be returned.
Words matter.
All you did was simply rephrase what I said, dickhead.No, they ruled the lower court ruling stands but they didnt know how that was to be enforced. That the administration needed to document all they were doing to get his return.
‘The Trump administration has suffered its second loss in as many months over a policy to change the rules regarding sex marker designations on U.S. passports for transgender and nonbinary people.
In late June, U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick, a Joe Biden appointee, blocked the U.S. Department of State from making two significant alterations to its passport policy regarding sex markers.
"Whereas the State Department previously permitted transgender passport applicants to self-select male ('M') or female ('F') sex markers that correspond to either their gender identity or sex assigned at birth, it now requires that passports reflect only the holder's sex assigned at birth," the court explained in its initial order. "And whereas the State Department previously allowed intersex, non-binary, and gender non-conforming applicants to elect 'X' as the sex marker on their passports, it now issues passports only with an 'M' or 'F' marker."
In turn, the U.S. Department of Justice moved to dissolve the injunction and have the judge stay her own order as the government appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. On Thursday, Kobick nixed that request.’
This is truly a non-issue – no one should care how one identifies concerning gender, and citizens should be at liberty to identify as they see fit, consistent with the right to self-expression and self-determination.
And these hateful efforts are pointless and futile, as the next administration will again allow citizens who are intersex, non-binary, and gender non-conforming to elect 'X’ as a sex marker on their passports.