---------------------------------- not about YOUR safety , who cares about your safety . Types like YOU are disposable . The guy with the GLOCK that you reference is simply carrying so that he is Prepared and for HIS safety Candy .For the seven who were not killed during the changes; I’m sure it is of great comfort to them.You have to break off your attack, switch out the empty magazine, then re-acquire your target.
LOL! Or, you switch out the magazine and acquire a new target. In the Luby's massacre in Killeen Texas back in 1991, the shooter reloaded at least three times before police arrived. Having to switch magazines didn't save any of the 23 people killed or 27 wounded that day.
A Texas Massacre
Perhaps it meant 23 was not 30?
Less time shooting is better than more time shooting....agreed?
I'm sure it was a great comfort to the 23 that changing magazines slowed him so much.
Had the Luby’s been in most other developed nations, there wouldn’t have been a shooting in the first place….
IF you know anything about the incident, you know that Suzanna Gratia Hupp is convinced that if she had been carrying her pistol (that was out in her car), she could have stopped the shooting. THAT would have been much more comforting to the victims.
Good for Ms. Hupp I suppose.
We were in a MacAllisters Deli the other day and there was a guy carrying his Glock on his hip. On his chest was the shirt from the local AT&T store. Somehow, I didn’t feel much safer with Wyatt Earp there having his ham sandwich. LOL