New York Will Sue trump If He Sends His Troops To The City

[bendog]

Philadelphia's DA said he is prepared to arrest the federal agents.

that wont end well for him. Imagine they were this motivated to stop the killing in thier cities.

Civil disobedience and non-violence are the only answer to Trump's militarization. There's no way Homeland Security ventures into a place where it'd be actually dangerous form them. Chicago, LA, places in Minny. I don't like confrontations, but Trump is seeking them for photo ops, because most voters aren't interested in street theatre.

so the status quo of young black men being shot is ok with you to the point you would rather see a confrontation between the federal and state than see it stopped.

democrats have failed black people, this is one glaring example

Trump doesn't give a shit about black on black crime, and neither do you so stop the bs. Trump just wants culture wars to try and get suburban votes

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I'm glad to see real Americans standing up for the constitution, the law and our people.

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

I don't see how any court in this nation won't stop trump from doing this.

New York would sue if Trump sends federal troops: mayor

New York would go to court to stop President Donald Trump from sending federal troops to the city to quell rising crime, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday. After the Department of Homeland Security deployed scores of Border Patrol police and federal marshals -- many on combat fatigues -- to...

news.yahoo.com

Governors should mobilize their National Guard units in greater numbers than the Federal secret police to keep control of them within state borders, unless they are willing to give up local rule for federal troop rule. Secret police without name tags, or identification, wearing balaclava to avoid personal identification and without local authorization or control is the road to hell. This is not what the founding fathers had in mind.

This is one of the things the founders fought against.

It's what the British did to the colonists which is why we have a 1st, 4th and 5th amendments.

I can't believe today's conservatives still hate our constitution.

Colonial America didn't have looters and rioters marching through the streets of its Tremendous Cities, so it really isn't a valid comparison.

If they had, they would have actually expected George III to send men in to restore order.

You need to read the Declaration of Independence. Specifically the Intolerable Acts. The colonists did demand protection from the attacks by native savages. Settlements and outlying homes were massacred. The colonists demanded that King George send men to restore order. They were ignored. It's right there.

 

[Dana7360]

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

TOO FUNNY. By the time DeBlazio knew the feds were there, the problem would be solved and they would be gone. Do you have any idea how long it takes to "sue" someone? And just how does DeBlazio intend to remove them?

But IT IS NICE TO KNOW that DeBlazio would rather have crime than law and order and takes having federal help there to get his dirtball shithole scummy city in order a more serious, bigger problem, than thugs and criminals rioting, looting and robbing the city.

I guess DeBlazio knows where his next federal help will be next time he asks for it, too.

TOO FUNNY. By the time DeBlazio knew the feds were there, the problem would be solved and they would be gone. Do you have any idea how long it takes to "sue" someone? And just how does DeBlazio intend to remove them?
BINGO. Give the man a cigar. If you think police response is slow, just look at the courts.

Weird. The AG of Oregon filed their lawsuit last Friday.

Today they are in court getting a restraining order to stop trump and get his goons out of Oregon.

The judge is going to issue a written ruling soon.

I guess a few days is a long time.

Oregon’s attorney general argues for temporary restraining order against federal law enforcement

Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum urges a judge to declare it unacceptable for federal officers to engage in "unconstitutional police state-type tactics to detain citizens without cause.'' A U.S Department of Justice attorney David Morrell asks court to reject the request, and provide deference...

www.oregonlive.com

 

[White 6]

I'm glad to see real Americans standing up for the constitution, the law and our people.

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

I don't see how any court in this nation won't stop trump from doing this.

New York would sue if Trump sends federal troops: mayor

New York would go to court to stop President Donald Trump from sending federal troops to the city to quell rising crime, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday. After the Department of Homeland Security deployed scores of Border Patrol police and federal marshals -- many on combat fatigues -- to...

news.yahoo.com

Governors should mobilize their National Guard units in greater numbers than the Federal secret police to keep control of them within state borders, unless they are willing to give up local rule for federal troop rule. Secret police without name tags, or identification, wearing balaclava to avoid personal identification and without local authorization or control is the road to hell. This is not what the founding fathers had in mind.

This is one of the things the founders fought against.

It's what the British did to the colonists which is why we have a 1st, 4th and 5th amendments.

I can't believe today's conservatives still hate our constitution.

What you are missing is misidentifying them as conservative. They are not conservative. Conservatives support the constitution. They react and govern conservatively making small course corrections to avoid radical results and avoid the slippery slopes for momentary gain. These are the right wing trump supporters, basically radical as no longer believing the constitution can meet the challenge of the modern world and will opt for strongman leadership constitutional or not, to meet their goals.

How does that explain all the republicans and conservatives in our congress/government who follow trump blindly?

Even conservatives who first were against him as president such as lindsey graham, ted. cruz and susan collins.

All of the republicans in our congress today swear they are conservatives yet they don't seem to have a problem with what trump has been and is doing.

Unfortunately it's only democrats who are standing up to him and trying to stop him.

What conservative is joining with the democrats or filing their own court cases to stop trump?

Is blind following a mark of conservative thought? The Tea-Party people came up with Republicans in name only. Modern republicans in office are largely conservative in name only. Normal rule of thumb is when viewing an action or listening to speaker would be, would be to ask yourself would a normal conservative thinking person do that or make that statement or is it just to incite the masses or opposition? Big difference between being right wing and active in a conservative manor. Sounds good to project you are a conservative instead of radical right. Most of them in both houses of congress are either radical right or just in the office to be on the dole and with the perks and access to information and money, they know what side their bread is buttered on, not exactly public minded citizens, more personal advantage elite. Not conservative.

 

[toomuchtime_]

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

TOO FUNNY. By the time DeBlazio knew the feds were there, the problem would be solved and they would be gone. Do you have any idea how long it takes to "sue" someone? And just how does DeBlazio intend to remove them?

But IT IS NICE TO KNOW that DeBlazio would rather have crime than law and order and takes having federal help there to get his dirtball shithole scummy city in order a more serious, bigger problem, than thugs and criminals rioting, looting and robbing the city.

I guess DeBlazio knows where his next federal help will be next time he asks for it, too.

TOO FUNNY. By the time DeBlazio knew the feds were there, the problem would be solved and they would be gone. Do you have any idea how long it takes to "sue" someone? And just how does DeBlazio intend to remove them?
BINGO. Give the man a cigar. If you think police response is slow, just look at the courts.

Weird. The AG of Oregon filed their lawsuit last Friday.

Today they are in court getting a restraining order to stop trump and get his goons out of Oregon.

The judge is going to issue a written ruling soon.

I guess a few days is a long time.

Oregon’s attorney general argues for temporary restraining order against federal law enforcement

Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum urges a judge to declare it unacceptable for federal officers to engage in "unconstitutional police state-type tactics to detain citizens without cause.'' A U.S Department of Justice attorney David Morrell asks court to reject the request, and provide deference...

www.oregonlive.com

Maybe you should try reading the articles you post before posting them. The judge seemed astonished at the bizarre suit the Oregon AG was filing.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

TOO FUNNY. By the time DeBlazio knew the feds were there, the problem would be solved and they would be gone. Do you have any idea how long it takes to "sue" someone? And just how does DeBlazio intend to remove them?

But IT IS NICE TO KNOW that DeBlazio would rather have crime than law and order and takes having federal help there to get his dirtball shithole scummy city in order a more serious, bigger problem, than thugs and criminals rioting, looting and robbing the city.

I guess DeBlazio knows where his next federal help will be next time he asks for it, too.

TOO FUNNY. By the time DeBlazio knew the feds were there, the problem would be solved and they would be gone. Do you have any idea how long it takes to "sue" someone? And just how does DeBlazio intend to remove them?
BINGO. Give the man a cigar. If you think police response is slow, just look at the courts.

Weird. The AG of Oregon filed their lawsuit last Friday.

Today they are in court getting a restraining order to stop trump and get his goons out of Oregon.

The judge is going to issue a written ruling soon.

I guess a few days is a long time.

Oregon’s attorney general argues for temporary restraining order against federal law enforcement

Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum urges a judge to declare it unacceptable for federal officers to engage in "unconstitutional police state-type tactics to detain citizens without cause.'' A U.S Department of Justice attorney David Morrell asks court to reject the request, and provide deference...

www.oregonlive.com

It will be very interesting for a federal court to find that the federal government has no interest in protecting federal property. Specifically a federal courthouse.

 

[Dana7360]

I'm glad to see real Americans standing up for the constitution, the law and our people.

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

I don't see how any court in this nation won't stop trump from doing this.

New York would sue if Trump sends federal troops: mayor

New York would go to court to stop President Donald Trump from sending federal troops to the city to quell rising crime, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday. After the Department of Homeland Security deployed scores of Border Patrol police and federal marshals -- many on combat fatigues -- to...

news.yahoo.com

Governors should mobilize their National Guard units in greater numbers than the Federal secret police to keep control of them within state borders, unless they are willing to give up local rule for federal troop rule. Secret police without name tags, or identification, wearing balaclava to avoid personal identification and without local authorization or control is the road to hell. This is not what the founding fathers had in mind.

This is one of the things the founders fought against.

It's what the British did to the colonists which is why we have a 1st, 4th and 5th amendments.

I can't believe today's conservatives still hate our constitution.

What you are missing is misidentifying them as conservative. They are not conservative. Conservatives support the constitution. They react and govern conservatively making small course corrections to avoid radical results and avoid the slippery slopes for momentary gain. These are the right wing trump supporters, basically radical as no longer believing the constitution can meet the challenge of the modern world and will opt for strongman leadership constitutional or not, to meet their goals.

How does that explain all the republicans and conservatives in our congress/government who follow trump blindly?

Even conservatives who first were against him as president such as lindsey graham, ted. cruz and susan collins.

All of the republicans in our congress today swear they are conservatives yet they don't seem to have a problem with what trump has been and is doing.

Unfortunately it's only democrats who are standing up to him and trying to stop him.

What conservative is joining with the democrats or filing their own court cases to stop trump?

Is blind following a mark of conservative thought? The Tea-Party people came up with Republicans in name only. Modern republicans in office are largely conservative in name only. Normal rule of thumb is when viewing an action or listening to speaker would be, would be to ask yourself would a normal conservative thinking person do that or make that statement or is it just to incite the masses or opposition? Big difference between being right wing and active in a conservative manor. Sounds good to project you are a conservative instead of radical right. Most of them in both houses of congress are either radical right or just in the office to be on the dole and with the perks and access to information and money, they know what side their bread is buttered on, not exactly public minded citizens, more personal advantage elite. Not conservative.

Wow that's a lot of liars.

What about the ones who weren't part of the tea bagger bunch? They aren't conservatives either?

Is there any politician who is conservative?

From what I've observed in my life, this is what conservatives are. I haven't seen them behave much different only more extreme and radical as time goes on.

 

[toomuchtime_]

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

TOO FUNNY. By the time DeBlazio knew the feds were there, the problem would be solved and they would be gone. Do you have any idea how long it takes to "sue" someone? And just how does DeBlazio intend to remove them?

But IT IS NICE TO KNOW that DeBlazio would rather have crime than law and order and takes having federal help there to get his dirtball shithole scummy city in order a more serious, bigger problem, than thugs and criminals rioting, looting and robbing the city.

I guess DeBlazio knows where his next federal help will be next time he asks for it, too.

TOO FUNNY. By the time DeBlazio knew the feds were there, the problem would be solved and they would be gone. Do you have any idea how long it takes to "sue" someone? And just how does DeBlazio intend to remove them?
BINGO. Give the man a cigar. If you think police response is slow, just look at the courts.

Weird. The AG of Oregon filed their lawsuit last Friday.

Today they are in court getting a restraining order to stop trump and get his goons out of Oregon.

The judge is going to issue a written ruling soon.

I guess a few days is a long time.

Oregon’s attorney general argues for temporary restraining order against federal law enforcement

Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum urges a judge to declare it unacceptable for federal officers to engage in "unconstitutional police state-type tactics to detain citizens without cause.'' A U.S Department of Justice attorney David Morrell asks court to reject the request, and provide deference...

www.oregonlive.com

It will be very interesting for a federal court to find that the federal government has no interest in protecting federal property. Specifically a federal courthouse.

With the Speaker of the House calling federal law enforcement officers nazis and the presumptive Democratic nominee calling the police the enemy and a police presence on the streets and invasion, it is clear the entire Democratic Party has fallen into the rabbit hole.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I'm glad to see real Americans standing up for the constitution, the law and our people.

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

I don't see how any court in this nation won't stop trump from doing this.

New York would sue if Trump sends federal troops: mayor

New York would go to court to stop President Donald Trump from sending federal troops to the city to quell rising crime, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday. After the Department of Homeland Security deployed scores of Border Patrol police and federal marshals -- many on combat fatigues -- to...

news.yahoo.com

How are they gonna stop Trump?

Not a matter of stopping trump. Just put two humvees to shadow movement of all Fed unmarked rolling units of the secret police and control their activity and make sure the personnel are identified before being allowed out of the GSA parking lot with order to arrest on illegal activity if necessary. 150 secret police is no match for an infantry battalion. It is expensive, but the state has to decide whether to give up state control of troops within their borders and make no mistake the secret police is troops not law enforcement.

Illegal activity? Funny.

Activity such as seen on the news of rolling up with no identification to snatch people off the street into an unmarked car and taking of to who knows where for whatever they choose to do with them or to them. You can an should respect law enforcement. That ain't law enforcement. Makes a pretty strong case for the gun nuts that think you may need fully automatic weapons and high capacity magazines available to the people, to protect against excess of the government using federal troops. Never thought they were anything but gun nuts until now. Never though I would see secret police right here in my country.

THE. MEDIA. IS. LYING. TO. YOU.


View attachment 366129

View attachment 366130

Sorry, you fraud. The DHS director already came out and said that he told them to be unidentified for the safety of their families

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I'm glad to see real Americans standing up for the constitution, the law and our people.

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

I don't see how any court in this nation won't stop trump from doing this.

New York would sue if Trump sends federal troops: mayor

New York would go to court to stop President Donald Trump from sending federal troops to the city to quell rising crime, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday. After the Department of Homeland Security deployed scores of Border Patrol police and federal marshals -- many on combat fatigues -- to...

news.yahoo.com

How are they gonna stop Trump?

Not a matter of stopping trump. Just put two humvees to shadow movement of all Fed unmarked rolling units of the secret police and control their activity and make sure the personnel are identified before being allowed out of the GSA parking lot with order to arrest on illegal activity if necessary. 150 secret police is no match for an infantry battalion. It is expensive, but the state has to decide whether to give up state control of troops within their borders and make no mistake the secret police is troops not law enforcement.

Illegal activity? Funny.

Activity such as seen on the news of rolling up with no identification to snatch people off the street into an unmarked car and taking of to who knows where for whatever they choose to do with them or to them. You can an should respect law enforcement. That ain't law enforcement. Makes a pretty strong case for the gun nuts that think you may need fully automatic weapons and high capacity magazines available to the people, to protect against excess of the government using federal troops. Never thought they were anything but gun nuts until now. Never though I would see secret police right here in my country.

Their first name is on their chest and their badge # is on their upper arm.

False. Liar.

 

[White 6]

I'm glad to see real Americans standing up for the constitution, the law and our people.

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

I don't see how any court in this nation won't stop trump from doing this.

New York would sue if Trump sends federal troops: mayor

New York would go to court to stop President Donald Trump from sending federal troops to the city to quell rising crime, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday. After the Department of Homeland Security deployed scores of Border Patrol police and federal marshals -- many on combat fatigues -- to...

news.yahoo.com

Governors should mobilize their National Guard units in greater numbers than the Federal secret police to keep control of them within state borders, unless they are willing to give up local rule for federal troop rule. Secret police without name tags, or identification, wearing balaclava to avoid personal identification and without local authorization or control is the road to hell. This is not what the founding fathers had in mind.

This is one of the things the founders fought against.

It's what the British did to the colonists which is why we have a 1st, 4th and 5th amendments.

I can't believe today's conservatives still hate our constitution.

What you are missing is misidentifying them as conservative. They are not conservative. Conservatives support the constitution. They react and govern conservatively making small course corrections to avoid radical results and avoid the slippery slopes for momentary gain. These are the right wing trump supporters, basically radical as no longer believing the constitution can meet the challenge of the modern world and will opt for strongman leadership constitutional or not, to meet their goals.

How does that explain all the republicans and conservatives in our congress/government who follow trump blindly?

Even conservatives who first were against him as president such as lindsey graham, ted. cruz and susan collins.

All of the republicans in our congress today swear they are conservatives yet they don't seem to have a problem with what trump has been and is doing.

Unfortunately it's only democrats who are standing up to him and trying to stop him.

What conservative is joining with the democrats or filing their own court cases to stop trump?

Is blind following a mark of conservative thought? The Tea-Party people came up with Republicans in name only. Modern republicans in office are largely conservative in name only. Normal rule of thumb is when viewing an action or listening to speaker would be, would be to ask yourself would a normal conservative thinking person do that or make that statement or is it just to incite the masses or opposition? Big difference between being right wing and active in a conservative manor. Sounds good to project you are a conservative instead of radical right. Most of them in both houses of congress are either radical right or just in the office to be on the dole and with the perks and access to information and money, they know what side their bread is buttered on, not exactly public minded citizens, more personal advantage elite. Not conservative.

Wow that's a lot of liars.

What about the ones who weren't part of the tea bagger bunch? They aren't conservatives either?

Is there any politician who is conservative?

From what I've observed in my life, this is what conservatives are. I haven't seen them behave much different only more extreme and radical as time goes on.

If you were not acceptable to the tea party, you went underground hoping for better days. Not impressive courage standing tall for their beliefs, but not surprising in the modern "I/Me" 21st century.
Ronald Reagan they ain't and William F Buckley got to be rolling over in his grave. Surprised there is no uptick in seismic activity near Stanford, Connecticut.

I'm glad to see real Americans standing up for the constitution, the law and our people.

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

I don't see how any court in this nation won't stop trump from doing this.

New York would sue if Trump sends federal troops: mayor

New York would go to court to stop President Donald Trump from sending federal troops to the city to quell rising crime, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday. After the Department of Homeland Security deployed scores of Border Patrol police and federal marshals -- many on combat fatigues -- to...

news.yahoo.com

Governors should mobilize their National Guard units in greater numbers than the Federal secret police to keep control of them within state borders, unless they are willing to give up local rule for federal troop rule. Secret police without name tags, or identification, wearing balaclava to avoid personal identification and without local authorization or control is the road to hell. This is not what the founding fathers had in mind.

This is one of the things the founders fought against.

It's what the British did to the colonists which is why we have a 1st, 4th and 5th amendments.

I can't believe today's conservatives still hate our constitution.

What you are missing is misidentifying them as conservative. They are not conservative. Conservatives support the constitution. They react and govern conservatively making small course corrections to avoid radical results and avoid the slippery slopes for momentary gain. These are the right wing trump supporters, basically radical as no longer believing the constitution can meet the challenge of the modern world and will opt for strongman leadership constitutional or not, to meet their goals.

How does that explain all the republicans and conservatives in our congress/government who follow trump blindly?

Even conservatives who first were against him as president such as lindsey graham, ted. cruz and susan collins.

All of the republicans in our congress today swear they are conservatives yet they don't seem to have a problem with what trump has been and is doing.

Unfortunately it's only democrats who are standing up to him and trying to stop him.

What conservative is joining with the democrats or filing their own court cases to stop trump?

Is blind following a mark of conservative thought? The Tea-Party people came up with Republicans in name only. Modern republicans in office are largely conservative in name only. Normal rule of thumb is when viewing an action or listening to speaker would be, would be to ask yourself would a normal conservative thinking person do that or make that statement or is it just to incite the masses or opposition? Big difference between being right wing and active in a conservative manor. Sounds good to project you are a conservative instead of radical right. Most of them in both houses of congress are either radical right or just in the office to be on the dole and with the perks and access to information and money, they know what side their bread is buttered on, not exactly public minded citizens, more personal advantage elite. Not conservative.

Wow that's a lot of liars.

What about the ones who weren't part of the tea bagger bunch? They aren't conservatives either?

Is there any politician who is conservative?

From what I've observed in my life, this is what conservatives are. I haven't seen them behave much different only more extreme and radical as time goes on.

If you were not acceptable to the tea party, you went underground hoping for better days. Not impressive courage standing tall for their beliefs, but not surprising in the modern "I/Me" 21st century.
Ronald Reagan they ain't and William F Buckley got to be rolling over in his grave. Surprised there is no uptick in seismic activity near Stanford, Connecticut.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I'm glad to see real Americans standing up for the constitution, the law and our people.

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

I don't see how any court in this nation won't stop trump from doing this.

New York would sue if Trump sends federal troops: mayor

New York would go to court to stop President Donald Trump from sending federal troops to the city to quell rising crime, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday. After the Department of Homeland Security deployed scores of Border Patrol police and federal marshals -- many on combat fatigues -- to...

news.yahoo.com

How are they gonna stop Trump?

Not a matter of stopping trump. Just put two humvees to shadow movement of all Fed unmarked rolling units of the secret police and control their activity and make sure the personnel are identified before being allowed out of the GSA parking lot with order to arrest on illegal activity if necessary. 150 secret police is no match for an infantry battalion. It is expensive, but the state has to decide whether to give up state control of troops within their borders and make no mistake the secret police is troops not law enforcement.

You are not the only one hoping for the final break. That would mean open civil war. It can't come soon enough. Such action would authorize the use of active duty military.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

With the Speaker of the House calling federal law enforcement officers nazis and the presumptive Democratic nominee calling the police the enemy

Lies...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Such action would authorize the use of active duty military.

Who, of course, will be dispatched against the trump cult, when they go to war over losing the election.

 

[White 6]

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

TOO FUNNY. By the time DeBlazio knew the feds were there, the problem would be solved and they would be gone. Do you have any idea how long it takes to "sue" someone? And just how does DeBlazio intend to remove them?

But IT IS NICE TO KNOW that DeBlazio would rather have crime than law and order and takes having federal help there to get his dirtball shithole scummy city in order a more serious, bigger problem, than thugs and criminals rioting, looting and robbing the city.

I guess DeBlazio knows where his next federal help will be next time he asks for it, too.

TOO FUNNY. By the time DeBlazio knew the feds were there, the problem would be solved and they would be gone. Do you have any idea how long it takes to "sue" someone? And just how does DeBlazio intend to remove them?
BINGO. Give the man a cigar. If you think police response is slow, just look at the courts.

Weird. The AG of Oregon filed their lawsuit last Friday.

Today they are in court getting a restraining order to stop trump and get his goons out of Oregon.

The judge is going to issue a written ruling soon.

I guess a few days is a long time.

Oregon’s attorney general argues for temporary restraining order against federal law enforcement

Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum urges a judge to declare it unacceptable for federal officers to engage in "unconstitutional police state-type tactics to detain citizens without cause.'' A U.S Department of Justice attorney David Morrell asks court to reject the request, and provide deference...

www.oregonlive.com

It will be very interesting for a federal court to find that the federal government has no interest in protecting federal property. Specifically a federal courthouse.

With the Speaker of the House calling federal law enforcement officers nazis and the presumptive Democratic nominee calling the police the enemy and a police presence on the streets and invasion, it is clear the entire Democratic Party has fallen into the rabbit hole.

Heck, even I have likened them to the Nazis, but know they are more like trumps secret police and that the original secret police were only a tool of the Nazis. Always easy to find people willing to be in secretive government enforcement, no matter the country or century. Did not see where a Democratic nominee called the police the enemy. Is it in the same document where trump failed find Biden wanting to defund police because it wasn't there? If you got something, I'll read your link. I just don't want to follow trump down the rabbit hole that leads to strongman autocratic government instead of constitutional representative republic as laid out in the constitution by the founding fathers, who were afraid the federal government might have too much control in time of emergency.

 

[BS Filter]

I'm glad to see real Americans standing up for the constitution, the law and our people.

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

I don't see how any court in this nation won't stop trump from doing this.

New York would sue if Trump sends federal troops: mayor

New York would go to court to stop President Donald Trump from sending federal troops to the city to quell rising crime, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday. After the Department of Homeland Security deployed scores of Border Patrol police and federal marshals -- many on combat fatigues -- to...

news.yahoo.com

How are they gonna stop Trump?

Not a matter of stopping trump. Just put two humvees to shadow movement of all Fed unmarked rolling units of the secret police and control their activity and make sure the personnel are identified before being allowed out of the GSA parking lot with order to arrest on illegal activity if necessary. 150 secret police is no match for an infantry battalion. It is expensive, but the state has to decide whether to give up state control of troops within their borders and make no mistake the secret police is troops not law enforcement.

You are not the only one hoping for the final break. That would mean open civil war. It can't come soon enough. Such action would authorize the use of active duty military.

I hope they use bayonets

 

[BluesLegend]

How are they gonna stop Trump?

De Blasio will babble incoherently while Cuomo runs from a mob of nursing home patients bent on revenge.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Such action would authorize the use of active duty military.

Who, of course, will be dispatched against the trump cult, when they go to war over losing the election.

Trump is commander in chief of the military. What will you do when Trump wins? Entire former democrat cities are turning Republican.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump is commander in chief of the military

And they would ignore his horrible orders again, just as they already have.

 

[HaShev]

I'm glad to see real Americans standing up for the constitution, the law and our people.

De Blasio and other mayors have said they will take legal steps to stop trump.

I don't see how any court in this nation won't stop trump from doing this.

New York would sue if Trump sends federal troops: mayor

New York would go to court to stop President Donald Trump from sending federal troops to the city to quell rising crime, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday. After the Department of Homeland Security deployed scores of Border Patrol police and federal marshals -- many on combat fatigues -- to...

news.yahoo.com

Actually it's the opposite, the residents can sue the city for violating their constitutional rights and the fraud that is NY taxation raised & ear marked for protecting the citizens being missused=missapropriation of funds.
The citizens should organize a kick Deblasio out of office rally where the cops would surely step aside, then vote Rudy in to clean up the Liberal mess.