Loki from your post #98 and 99.
I've been running my business for 18 years my father run it for 35 years before me now my son as CEOs in last five years.
Congratulations to you all.
For decades I've known hundreds and hundreds of business owners and companies here in U.S. From aircraft mfr., to restaurants, hotels and many others. I don't even count foreign entities.
Thanks for sharing.
I will answer all your questions based from a "reality and facts" considering your not even a business owner.
That's fine. I don't go in much for arguments from authority.
Regardless, as a proponent for statutory minimum wage, I am skeptical that you'll answer any of my questions.
I'll remind you that the primary question posed to you folks is:
"What is your objection to basing a worker's wage solely upon what that worker's work is worth?"
Who determined the worth of an employee? The employer. Who else do you think? You?
If you had read the posts you cite, you'd have read that I am not the arbiter of "worth" for anyone but myself, I do not believe that I have the moral authority to make such a determination for others.
For an employment arrangement to be morally valid, the employer and the employee must agree upon what the prospective work is worth.
Since you CLEARLY presume someone has the authority to determine worth for everyone, it is valid to ask you these questions: Who do you think should determine worth for everyone else? Upon what moral authority do base your choice?
I'm not talking about worth of a human being its the worth of the job.
Good. Because that is obviously not the question I asked.
Employees disadvantage in salary negotiations. That is correct.
If you're talking absolutes, you're talking nonsense.
Labor markets are dynamic and diverse. When labor is in shortage, employees have a negotiating advantage; when labor is abundant, employers have the advantage.
If we hire an engineer we have our pay scale. We don't offer you more or less than that. Unless your specialty like walk on water. Then I'm willing to relocate you with housing. Aside from that no deal. It's unfair if we are paying our current eng. 125k then we offer you 150k that doesn't make sense.
I have no problem with you volunteering to disadadvsntage yourself so. And I have no problem with employees choosing of their own volition to accept your terms.
I have no idea what point you're attempting to advance with this information.
Minimum wage increase to $15. The increase is incremental that take 3 to years to get there. I know several restaurant owners like Applebee's, tgif, olive g and others like in Seattle or Boston area.
CHRIST! Can't any of you get to your point in a straightforward manner?
All business owners hate wage increases b/c it cut down the profits.
No. No they don't. They hate COMPULSORY wage increases because they are unconnected to profitability. Sometimes, wage increases are a very good means to improve profits.
Restaurants had increased prices just about every year at their own discretion. Did customers went away? No but profit increases.
Whatever. Your point?
People like you get pay increase every year.
Presumptive, and wrong.
But please, do not let me stop you from getting to some kind of point.
So what is the problem if these low wages people get small increases.
I have no problem with people getting raises.
Don't tell me your entire effort here is just to construct some fatuous straw man to distract us all from the fact that you're not going to answer my question.
Where was the last time m/w was increased?
Not relevant.
Can you live with minimum wage?
Really not relevant.
I do not believe for a fact that business will close bc of mw increase.
So what? Really. SO WHAT?
Case of Z Pizza in Seattle that's BS. Why is it that she is in trouble ( right away) when others are thriving? Did fox interview other pizza place in that area? It's impossible to point one pizza place as a symptom of deeper problem. Maybe bad service. I know a rest. that closed bc of bad service.
Well, once more we have another proponent for statutory minimum wage who engages in distraction to avoid answering the straightforward question:
What is your objection to basing a worker's wage solely upon what that worker's work is worth?