New York mass public shooter? Chose gun free zone, used rifle with democrat approved, fixed, 10 round magazine.

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
112,367
52,615
2,290
The more information we get from the shooters "manifesto," the faster this story will disappear.........from his own writing, he chose a gun free zone, specifically mentioning concealed carriers as a deterrent......and he used a democrat party approved rifle...a rifle with a 10 round, fixed magazine...

-Attacking in a weapon-restricted area may decrease the chance of civilian backlash. Schools,
courts, or areas where CCW are outlawed or prohibited may be good areas of attack. Areas
where CW permits are low may also fit in this category. Areas with strict gun laws are also

great places of attack.

 
Last edited:
The more information we get from the shooters "manifesto," the faster this story will disappear.........from his own writing, he chose a gun free zone, specifically mentioning concealed carriers as a deterrent......and he used a democrat party approved rifle...a rifle with a 10 round, fixed magazine...

Spree Killer Manifesto
Screen-Shot-2022-05-14-at-Saturday-May-14-9.02-PM.png

10 dead, 13 shot, in ‘hate crime and racially motived’ shooting at Buffalo grocery store, officials say

Yet, another mass public shooter clearly shows that gun-free zones are magnets for these types of attacks. New York states with extremely strict gun control laws was an attractive place to attack. Note that right now the U.S. Supreme Court is looking at the state’s very restrictive May Issue law. As the killer’s manifesto indicates, “areas where CCW permits are low may also” be good areas of attack.

Ironically, New York has all the gun laws that Democrats say we need to stop these attacks — background checks on the private transfer of guns (so-called universal background checks) to a strict assault weapon ban. Virtually no concealed handgun permits in Buffalo where the attack occurred.

He appears to have been motivated by the environmentalist/socialist/racist Mosque shooter in New Zealand who hoped that his attack would spur more gun control. The El Paso environmentalist/socialist/racist shooter also had a very similar discussion of what targets to pick:

 
The more information we get from the shooters "manifesto," the faster this story will disappear.........from his own writing, he chose a gun free zone, specifically mentioning concealed carriers as a deterrent......and he used a democrat party approved rifle...a rifle with a 10 round, fixed magazine...

-Attacking in a weapon-restricted area may decrease the chance of civilian backlash. Schools,
courts, or areas where CCW are outlawed or prohibited may be good areas of attack. Areas
where CW permits are low may also fit in this category. Areas with strict gun laws are also

great places of attack.

gunfree.jpg
 
Spree Killer Manifesto
Screen-Shot-2022-05-14-at-Saturday-May-14-9.02-PM.png

10 dead, 13 shot, in ‘hate crime and racially motived’ shooting at Buffalo grocery store, officials say

Yet, another mass public shooter clearly shows that gun-free zones are magnets for these types of attacks. New York states with extremely strict gun control laws was an attractive place to attack. Note that right now the U.S. Supreme Court is looking at the state’s very restrictive May Issue law. As the killer’s manifesto indicates, “areas where CCW permits are low may also” be good areas of attack.

Ironically, New York has all the gun laws that Democrats say we need to stop these attacks — background checks on the private transfer of guns (so-called universal background checks) to a strict assault weapon ban. Virtually no concealed handgun permits in Buffalo where the attack occurred.

He appears to have been motivated by the environmentalist/socialist/racist Mosque shooter in New Zealand who hoped that his attack would spur more gun control. The El Paso environmentalist/socialist/racist shooter also had a very similar discussion of what targets to pick:
With this selected shooting, the civil war has now started with bullets flying from all directions. You can bet it will escalate rapidly.
 
The more information we get from the shooters "manifesto," the faster this story will disappear.........from his own writing, he chose a gun free zone, specifically mentioning concealed carriers as a deterrent......and he used a democrat party approved rifle...a rifle with a 10 round, fixed magazine...

-Attacking in a weapon-restricted area may decrease the chance of civilian backlash. Schools,
courts, or areas where CCW are outlawed or prohibited may be good areas of attack. Areas
where CW permits are low may also fit in this category. Areas with strict gun laws are also

great places of attack.

Yet, he attacked a store with an armed security guard
 
It was a gun free zone....where do you have a link about the security guard.
Ummmm maybe the security guard that shot him but was ineffective because the RW Terrorist was wearing body armor
 
Yet, he attacked a store with an armed security guard


Oh....an armed security guard....shot him but the guy had a vest........thanks for that point.....

But only the security guard had a gun, it was a gun free zone for normal people. Once the only guy with a government approved gun was killed, the rest of the people were unarmed and helpless......

 
Ummmm maybe the security guard that shot him but was ineffective because the RW Terrorist was wearing body armor


He was a left winger, not a right winger....his manifesto states he was a left winger.

And no one else there was allowed to have a gun, it was a gun free zone....

When the government can't, or won't protect you...like here...that is why good people need to be able to own and carry guns...
 
Oh....an armed security guard....shot him but the guy had a vest........thanks for that point.....

But only the security guard had a gun, it was a gun free zone for normal people. Once the only guy with a government approved gun was killed, the rest of the people were unarmed and helpless......

How many shoppers were wearing vests?
 
He was a left winger, not a right winger....his manifesto states he was a left winger.

And no one else there was allowed to have a gun, it was a gun free zone....

When the government can't, or won't protect you...like here...that is why good people need to be able to own and carry guns...
Nice try Skippy

His anti-immigrant rants make him definitely RW
 
Nice try Skippy

His anti-immigrant rants make him definitely RW

His own statements in his manifesto make him a left winger...

The Walmart shooter targeted immigrants because he was an eco-fascist and believed they were damaging the environment....eco-fascism is anti-immigrant....even legal immigration....
 
His own statements in his manifesto make him a left winger...

The Walmart shooter targeted immigrants because he was an eco-fascist and believed they were damaging the environment....eco-fascism is anti-immigrant....even legal immigration....
Nice Bizarro World logic
 
I love how bed wetters always want to pretend "right wingers" aren't the people working to prevent innocent lives from being taken from the womb. The fact is, bed wetting leftist filth hates humanity, they're the ones bitching about over population, they're the ones who hate America, our traditions, our culture, our morality, our religions, and our way of life.

So naturally this asshole has to be more left wing than any of us, by default alone.

No one has ever had a gun put to their heads and forced to live free, millions have been murdered for refusing to live without freedom.
 
When you creeps make heroes of killers like that kenosha killer it is inevitble that there will be others.
Race hate and right wing politics is supported by the gun lobby and the US pays the price.
There will be people on here cheering on this kid.
 

Forum List

Back
Top