Except for the fact you're doing just that by convicting Martin based on what? Nothing.
Martin was walking down the street and was chased. There's no disputing that.
The fact that he may or am not have fought could more logically and easily be explained as he felt he was in danger and had to fight to survive.
Instead, he is painted by some here as a vicious animal who needed to be put down. I can't help feeling that underlying that is racism.
I haven't convicted Martin of anything. Martin's dead, he's not going to be convicted of anything.
All I've said is that there's no way to know, given what we have available to us. And there's not. But it pains me to see retards making shit up to justify their premature and ill advised determination of Zimmerman's guilt. When idiots say things like "Zimmerman was a crazed stalker who chased after this wee laddie picking daisies and whistling a merry tune, with his gun drawn and lips drawn back from pointy teeth..." I feel compelled to point out that one of the few things we DO know for certain is that...
Trayvon was a really big kid.
Trayvon definitely had some behavior issues.
The neighborhood was being terrorized by violent and blatant criminals.
Trayvon sported the criminal affect.
We know these things for sure. There are pictures, we have the evidence of that.
We don't have evidence that Zimmerman was a loon...his neighbors sure as shit aren't saying that. We don't have evidence that he stalked Martin. We don't have evidence he drew a gun on him before he was knocked down. We don't have evidence that he was the aggressor.
Stick to what you know..and what do you have?
You have a punkish kid (and that is not a crime, it's just a fact) in a spooked neighborhood. That's all we know.