New video of Arbery swearing at cops, almost got tased

[Superbadbrutha]

New video released of Ahmaud Arbery's confrontation with cops when approached in a park

A 2017 video has emerged showing slain Georgia man Ahmaud Arbery angrily confronting cops in a park, with an aggressive officer pulling his Taser.

www.bizpacreview.com

This video shows Arbery disrespect the cops, refused to take commands a couple of times, tazer malfunctioned, to bad.
This kid obviously has some issues, stemming from his parenting, I think that’s a females jacket he’s wearing, he’s exposing his underwear in a public park.

he almost attacked the cops just doing his job

the area is known for drugs and but AA couldn’t understand what he was saying.

So?

What does a video taken years ago have to do with him being hunted then murdered by men who aren't police?

And if it's ok for them to do that because of something Arbery did years ago, is it ok to hunt down and murder the trump followers in the video below years from now for yelling at and swearing at the police?



Or is it just ok to do that to a black man?

The racial divide in America is just red meat for you communist russian trolls to use to divide America and manipulate the stupid trump followers.

It doesn't work with the rest of America. We're not stupid.

By the way, how's the weather today in moscow comrade?

it goes to establish a pattern of violence and disrespect for the police and authority figures,,,

your video shows free people demanding their rights be restored from a fascist government,,,

So white men are automatically authority figures over black men, WTF is this, 1940.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

New video released of Ahmaud Arbery's confrontation with cops when approached in a park

A 2017 video has emerged showing slain Georgia man Ahmaud Arbery angrily confronting cops in a park, with an aggressive officer pulling his Taser.

www.bizpacreview.com

This video shows Arbery disrespect the cops, refused to take commands a couple of times, tazer malfunctioned, to bad.
This kid obviously has some issues, stemming from his parenting, I think that’s a females jacket he’s wearing, he’s exposing his underwear in a public park.

he almost attacked the cops just doing his job

the area is known for drugs and but AA couldn’t understand what he was saying.

So?

What does a video taken years ago have to do with him being hunted then murdered by men who aren't police?

And if it's ok for them to do that because of something Arbery did years ago, is it ok to hunt down and murder the trump followers in the video below years from now for yelling at and swearing at the police?



Or is it just ok to do that to a black man?

The racial divide in America is just red meat for you communist russian trolls to use to divide America and manipulate the stupid trump followers.

It doesn't work with the rest of America. We're not stupid.

By the way, how's the weather today in moscow comrade?

No it's ok for white men to protest the police, but black men are suppose to bow down.

 

[JoeB131]

The professor was arrested for belligerence and noncooperation with police who were just doing their job

He had no key and no documentation linking him to that house

The police already established that he was the homeowner. They arrested him because he objected to the assumption he was a criminal.

 

[JoeB131]

Oh I get it.
I acted like a dumbass myself.......when I was 16.
Then as I grew into adulthood I found it was best to just cooperate and not to hang out in a known drug dealing area.

My guess is, the cops have never harassed you for just sitting in your car.

This is why I don't like body cams. If this were the old days the police could have worked his mouthy punk ass over with flashlights.

Maybe someone needs to work you over with flashlights... but you'll claim you don't deserve it.

Again, it's hilarious that the same people who support police brutality are all upset they have to wear masks in public now.

 

[Jitss617]

New video released of Ahmaud Arbery's confrontation with cops when approached in a park

A 2017 video has emerged showing slain Georgia man Ahmaud Arbery angrily confronting cops in a park, with an aggressive officer pulling his Taser.

www.bizpacreview.com

This video shows Arbery disrespect the cops, refused to take commands a couple of times, tazer malfunctioned, to bad.
This kid obviously has some issues, stemming from his parenting, I think that’s a females jacket he’s wearing, he’s exposing his underwear in a public park.

he almost attacked the cops just doing his job

the area is known for drugs and but AA couldn’t understand what he was saying.

This is why I don't like body cams. If this were the old days the police could have worked his mouthy punk ass over with flashlights.

So he should have just bowed down and kept his mouth shut, I know that most of the racist trash longs for the Good Ole Days.

Or stopped exposing his underwear wear?

 

[Mac-7]

The professor was arrested for belligerence and noncooperation with police who were just doing their job

He had no key and no documentation linking him to that house

The police already established that he was the homeowner. They arrested him because he objected to the assumption he was a criminal.

No they didnt

he had no identification with that address on it

 

[progressive hunter]

New video released of Ahmaud Arbery's confrontation with cops when approached in a park

A 2017 video has emerged showing slain Georgia man Ahmaud Arbery angrily confronting cops in a park, with an aggressive officer pulling his Taser.

www.bizpacreview.com

This video shows Arbery disrespect the cops, refused to take commands a couple of times, tazer malfunctioned, to bad.
This kid obviously has some issues, stemming from his parenting, I think that’s a females jacket he’s wearing, he’s exposing his underwear in a public park.

he almost attacked the cops just doing his job

the area is known for drugs and but AA couldn’t understand what he was saying.

So?

What does a video taken years ago have to do with him being hunted then murdered by men who aren't police?

And if it's ok for them to do that because of something Arbery did years ago, is it ok to hunt down and murder the trump followers in the video below years from now for yelling at and swearing at the police?



Or is it just ok to do that to a black man?

The racial divide in America is just red meat for you communist russian trolls to use to divide America and manipulate the stupid trump followers.

It doesn't work with the rest of America. We're not stupid.

By the way, how's the weather today in moscow comrade?

it goes to establish a pattern of violence and disrespect for the police and authority figures,,,

your video shows free people demanding their rights be restored from a fascist government,,,

So white men are automatically authority figures over black men, WTF is this, 1940.

an authority figure is anyone taking control of a situation,,,

only a racist would think its what you said,,,

 

[Jitss617]

Democrats want the narrative to be blacks aren’t being treated equal..

What would be racist is letting him go because he’s black. They are treating him equal which makes them equality fighters

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

He was hanging out in a known drug trafficking area.

And that gives the cops the right to violate his civil rights?

Remember when he was the "peaceful jogger"? Boy, that narrative sure fell apart.

Not really. He was committed no crime. He was minding his own business in a park. A cop decided to search him "just because" and when he got irate about it, another cop tried to use a taser on him (which malfunctioned).

If anyone looks worse for this, it's law enforcement.

You'd have to wonder what these cops would have tried to pull if they weren't required to wear body cams.

So why did he get all bent out of shape if he wasnt doing anything?

Was he arrested?

Why would they arrest him if he wasnt doing anything wrong?
And that of course brings to question. If he wasnt doing anything wrong why'd he get all worked up?
You show the cop your ID and everyone goes away happy.
Dudes just another knappy headed dumbass with a chip on his shoulder.

Why would they even stop him if he wasn't doing anything wrong?

Well you know you usually get pissed off when folks are harassing you and you aren't doing anything wrong.

Well you know you racist love to see the police messing with black men, because that is usually the only way you cowards can do it.

Man if you're truly this stupid it's no wonder you morons have constant run ins with the PO PO.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Oh I get it.
I acted like a dumbass myself.......when I was 16.
Then as I grew into adulthood I found it was best to just cooperate and not to hang out in a known drug dealing area.

My guess is, the cops have never harassed you for just sitting in your car.

This is why I don't like body cams. If this were the old days the police could have worked his mouthy punk ass over with flashlights.

Maybe someone needs to work you over with flashlights... but you'll claim you don't deserve it.

Again, it's hilarious that the same people who support police brutality are all upset they have to wear masks in public now.

Of course I've been fucked with by the cops sitting in my truck,a bunch of times actually.
The solution to the problem was incredibly simple.
I stopped hanging out in my truck in a park for no apparent reason.
Grab a lawn chair and a book and they'll drive right on by.

I was smacked around by the cops in my youth and deserved every bit of it.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

New video released of Ahmaud Arbery's confrontation with cops when approached in a park

A 2017 video has emerged showing slain Georgia man Ahmaud Arbery angrily confronting cops in a park, with an aggressive officer pulling his Taser.

www.bizpacreview.com

This video shows Arbery disrespect the cops, refused to take commands a couple of times, tazer malfunctioned, to bad.
This kid obviously has some issues, stemming from his parenting, I think that’s a females jacket he’s wearing, he’s exposing his underwear in a public park.

he almost attacked the cops just doing his job

the area is known for drugs and but AA couldn’t understand what he was saying.

So?

What does a video taken years ago have to do with him being hunted then murdered by men who aren't police?

And if it's ok for them to do that because of something Arbery did years ago, is it ok to hunt down and murder the trump followers in the video below years from now for yelling at and swearing at the police?



Or is it just ok to do that to a black man?

The racial divide in America is just red meat for you communist russian trolls to use to divide America and manipulate the stupid trump followers.

It doesn't work with the rest of America. We're not stupid.

By the way, how's the weather today in moscow comrade?

it goes to establish a pattern of violence and disrespect for the police and authority figures,,,

your video shows free people demanding their rights be restored from a fascist government,,,

So white men are automatically authority figures over black men, WTF is this, 1940.

an authority figure is anyone taking control of a situation,,,

only a racist would think its what you said,,,

So if I pull a gun on you and tell you to get your ass on the ground, am I a authority figure?

He was hanging out in a known drug trafficking area.

And that gives the cops the right to violate his civil rights?

Remember when he was the "peaceful jogger"? Boy, that narrative sure fell apart.

Not really. He was committed no crime. He was minding his own business in a park. A cop decided to search him "just because" and when he got irate about it, another cop tried to use a taser on him (which malfunctioned).

If anyone looks worse for this, it's law enforcement.

You'd have to wonder what these cops would have tried to pull if they weren't required to wear body cams.

So why did he get all bent out of shape if he wasnt doing anything?

Was he arrested?

Why would they arrest him if he wasnt doing anything wrong?
And that of course brings to question. If he wasnt doing anything wrong why'd he get all worked up?
You show the cop your ID and everyone goes away happy.
Dudes just another knappy headed dumbass with a chip on his shoulder.

Why would they even stop him if he wasn't doing anything wrong?

Well you know you usually get pissed off when folks are harassing you and you aren't doing anything wrong.

Well you know you racist love to see the police messing with black men, because that is usually the only way you cowards can do it.

Man if you're truly this stupid it's no wonder you morons have constant run ins with the PO PO.

Well moron the stupidity is you cowards.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

New video released of Ahmaud Arbery's confrontation with cops when approached in a park

A 2017 video has emerged showing slain Georgia man Ahmaud Arbery angrily confronting cops in a park, with an aggressive officer pulling his Taser.

www.bizpacreview.com

This video shows Arbery disrespect the cops, refused to take commands a couple of times, tazer malfunctioned, to bad.
This kid obviously has some issues, stemming from his parenting, I think that’s a females jacket he’s wearing, he’s exposing his underwear in a public park.

he almost attacked the cops just doing his job

the area is known for drugs and but AA couldn’t understand what he was saying.

So?

What does a video taken years ago have to do with him being hunted then murdered by men who aren't police?

And if it's ok for them to do that because of something Arbery did years ago, is it ok to hunt down and murder the trump followers in the video below years from now for yelling at and swearing at the police?



Or is it just ok to do that to a black man?

The racial divide in America is just red meat for you communist russian trolls to use to divide America and manipulate the stupid trump followers.

It doesn't work with the rest of America. We're not stupid.

By the way, how's the weather today in moscow comrade?

it goes to establish a pattern of violence and disrespect for the police and authority figures,,,

your video shows free people demanding their rights be restored from a fascist government,,,

So white men are automatically authority figures over black men, WTF is this, 1940.

an authority figure is anyone taking control of a situation,,,

only a racist would think its what you said,,,

So if I pull a gun on you and tell you to get your ass on the ground, am I a authority figure?

He was hanging out in a known drug trafficking area.

And that gives the cops the right to violate his civil rights?

Remember when he was the "peaceful jogger"? Boy, that narrative sure fell apart.

Not really. He was committed no crime. He was minding his own business in a park. A cop decided to search him "just because" and when he got irate about it, another cop tried to use a taser on him (which malfunctioned).

If anyone looks worse for this, it's law enforcement.

You'd have to wonder what these cops would have tried to pull if they weren't required to wear body cams.

So why did he get all bent out of shape if he wasnt doing anything?

Was he arrested?

Why would they arrest him if he wasnt doing anything wrong?
And that of course brings to question. If he wasnt doing anything wrong why'd he get all worked up?
You show the cop your ID and everyone goes away happy.
Dudes just another knappy headed dumbass with a chip on his shoulder.

Why would they even stop him if he wasn't doing anything wrong?

Well you know you usually get pissed off when folks are harassing you and you aren't doing anything wrong.

Well you know you racist love to see the police messing with black men, because that is usually the only way you cowards can do it.

Man if you're truly this stupid it's no wonder you morons have constant run ins with the PO PO.

Well moron the stupidity is you cowards.

You dumb shits drive around in cars with broken headlights,tail lights,expired inspection stickers playing that rap crap as loud as you possibly can ......while smoking weed.
So yeah,some of the biggest morons on the planet.

 

[Jitss617]

New video released of Ahmaud Arbery's confrontation with cops when approached in a park

A 2017 video has emerged showing slain Georgia man Ahmaud Arbery angrily confronting cops in a park, with an aggressive officer pulling his Taser.

www.bizpacreview.com

This video shows Arbery disrespect the cops, refused to take commands a couple of times, tazer malfunctioned, to bad.
This kid obviously has some issues, stemming from his parenting, I think that’s a females jacket he’s wearing, he’s exposing his underwear in a public park.

he almost attacked the cops just doing his job

the area is known for drugs and but AA couldn’t understand what he was saying.

So?

What does a video taken years ago have to do with him being hunted then murdered by men who aren't police?

And if it's ok for them to do that because of something Arbery did years ago, is it ok to hunt down and murder the trump followers in the video below years from now for yelling at and swearing at the police?



Or is it just ok to do that to a black man?

The racial divide in America is just red meat for you communist russian trolls to use to divide America and manipulate the stupid trump followers.

It doesn't work with the rest of America. We're not stupid.

By the way, how's the weather today in moscow comrade?

it goes to establish a pattern of violence and disrespect for the police and authority figures,,,

your video shows free people demanding their rights be restored from a fascist government,,,

So white men are automatically authority figures over black men, WTF is this, 1940.

an authority figure is anyone taking control of a situation,,,

only a racist would think its what you said,,,

So if I pull a gun on you and tell you to get your ass on the ground, am I a authority figure?

He was hanging out in a known drug trafficking area.

And that gives the cops the right to violate his civil rights?

Remember when he was the "peaceful jogger"? Boy, that narrative sure fell apart.

Not really. He was committed no crime. He was minding his own business in a park. A cop decided to search him "just because" and when he got irate about it, another cop tried to use a taser on him (which malfunctioned).

If anyone looks worse for this, it's law enforcement.

You'd have to wonder what these cops would have tried to pull if they weren't required to wear body cams.

So why did he get all bent out of shape if he wasnt doing anything?

Was he arrested?

Why would they arrest him if he wasnt doing anything wrong?
And that of course brings to question. If he wasnt doing anything wrong why'd he get all worked up?
You show the cop your ID and everyone goes away happy.
Dudes just another knappy headed dumbass with a chip on his shoulder.

Why would they even stop him if he wasn't doing anything wrong?

Well you know you usually get pissed off when folks are harassing you and you aren't doing anything wrong.

Well you know you racist love to see the police messing with black men, because that is usually the only way you cowards can do it.

Man if you're truly this stupid it's no wonder you morons have constant run ins with the PO PO.

Well moron the stupidity is you cowards.

Did you just break in to a dwelling?

 

[texmaster]

So? Were there cops present when he was assaulted by the vigilante McMichaels?

You really need to educate yourself on the terms you use. Arbery assaulted McMichaels not the other way around.

If you really need yet another lesson in the law I'll be happy to provide it.

Actually. I live in Georgia. So chances are that I know the terms I am using. But I am not alone.

The Ahmaud Arbery Killing and Georgia Law

Explaining the legal issues surrounding the incident of two white men shooting a black jogger they suspected of a crime

arcdigital.media

That is written by an experienced defense attorney in Georgia who has handled capital cases before. So what qualifications do you have? Are you a lawyer with experience in Georgia? Otherwise I do not think you are in a position to teach.

Its pretty clear you don't.

Let's review the law itself.

2010 Georgia Code
TITLE 16 - CRIMES AND OFFENSES
CHAPTER 5 - CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
ARTICLE 2 - ASSAULT AND BATTERY
§ 16-5-20 - Simple assault
O.C.G.A. 16-5-20 (2010)
16-5-20. Simple assault


(a) A person commits the offense of simple assault when he or she either:

(1) Attempts to commit a violent injury to the person of another; or

(2) Commits an act which places another in reasonable apprehension of immediately receiving a violent injury.

(b) Except as provided in subsections (c) through (h) of this Code section, a person who commits the offense of simple assault shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

(c) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault in a public transit vehicle or station shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. For purposes of this Code section, "public transit vehicle" means a bus, van, or rail car used for the transportation of passengers within a system which receives a subsidy from tax revenues or is operated under a franchise contract with a county or municipality of this state.

(d) If the offense of simple assault is committed between past or present spouses, persons who are parents of the same child, parents and children, stepparents and stepchildren, foster parents and foster children, or other persons excluding siblings living or formerly living in the same household, the defendant shall be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. In no event shall this subsection be applicable to corporal punishment administered by a parent or guardian to a child or administered by a person acting in loco parentis.

(e) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault against a person who is 65 years of age or older shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.

(f) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault against an employee of a public school system of this state while such employee is engaged in official duties or on school property shall, upon conviction of such offense, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. For purposes of this Code section, "school property" shall include public school buses and stops for public school buses as designated by local school boards of education.

(g) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault against a female who is pregnant at the time of the offense shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.

(h) Nothing in this Code section shall be construed to permit the prosecution of:

(1) Any person for conduct relating to an abortion for which the consent of the pregnant woman, or person authorized by law to act on her behalf, has been obtained or for which such consent is implied by law;

(2) Any person for any medical treatment of the pregnant woman or her unborn child; or

(3) Any woman with respect to her unborn child.

For the purposes of this subsection, the term "unborn child" means a member of the species homo sapiens at any stage of development who is carried in the womb.



Now, go ahead and point to any part of that law based on the video where Arbury was assaulted.

I can easily point to where he was guilty of assault:

(1) Attempts to commit a violent injury to the person of another;

Your thief is on video attacking McMichaels without anyone moving toward him or raising any weapon at him.


Go ahead, can't wait to see this dance

Not that it matters because you don't have to actually point the gun at someone for it to be aggravated assault ... but let's see your evidence Travis didn't point his gun at Arbery....

lol So you want to play too.

Here is the Georgia law in aggravated assault

2017 Georgia Code
Title 16 - Crimes and Offenses
Chapter 5 - Crimes Against the Person
Article 2 - Assault and Battery
§ 16-5-21. Aggravated assault
Universal Citation: GA Code § 16-5-21 (2017)

• (a) A person commits the offense of aggravated assault when he or she assaults:
  • (1) With intent to murder, to rape, or to rob;
  • (2) With a deadly weapon or with any object, device, or instrument which, when used offensively against a person, is likely to or actually does result in serious bodily injury;
  • (3) With any object, device, or instrument which, when used offensively against a person, is likely to or actually does result in strangulation; or
  • (4) A person or persons without legal justification by discharging a firearm from within a motor vehicle toward a person or persons.
• (b) Except as provided in subsections (c) through (k) of this Code section, a person convicted of the offense of aggravated assault shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 20 years.
• (c)
  • (1) A person who knowingly commits the offense of aggravated assault upon a public safety officer while he or she is engaged in, or on account of the performance of, his or her official duties shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished as follows:
    • (A) When such assault occurs by the discharge of a firearm by a person who is at least 17 years of age, such person shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than ten nor more than 20 years and shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of ten years and no portion of the mandatory minimum sentence imposed shall be suspended, stayed, probated, deferred, or withheld by the sentencing court; provided, however, that in the court's discretion, the court may depart from such mandatory minimum sentence when the prosecuting attorney and defendant have agreed to a sentence that is below such mandatory minimum;
    • (B) When such assault does not involve the discharge of a firearm by a person who is at least 17 years of age, and does not involve only the use of the person's body, such person shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years and, for persons who are at least 17 years of age, shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of three years and no portion of the mandatory minimum sentence imposed shall be suspended, stayed, probated, deferred, or withheld by the sentencing court; provided, however, that in the court's discretion, the court may depart from such mandatory minimum sentence when the prosecuting attorney and defendant have agreed to a sentence that is below such mandatory minimum; or
    • (C) When such assault occurs only involving the use of the person's body, by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years.
  • (2) A person convicted under this subsection shall be punished, in addition to any term of imprisonment imposed, by a fine as provided by law which shall be at least $2,000.00. With respect to $2,000.00 of the fine imposed, after distributing the surcharges and deductions required by Chapter 21 of Title 15, Code Sections 36-15-9 and 42-8-34, and Title 47, it shall be earmarked for the Georgia State Indemnification Fund for purposes of payment of indemnification for death or disability as provided for in Part 1 of Article 5 of Chapter 9 of Title 45.
  • (3) As used in this subsection, the term "firearm" means any handgun, rifle, shotgun, or similar device or weapon which will or can be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or electrical charge.
• (d) Any person who commits the offense of aggravated assault against a person who is 65 years of age or older shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than three nor more than 20 years.
• (e) Any person who commits the offense of aggravated assault in a public transit vehicle or station shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than three nor more than 20 years.
• (f) Any person who commits the offense of aggravated assault upon a person in the course of violating Code Section 16-8-2 where the property that was the subject of the theft was a vehicle engaged in commercial transportation of cargo or any appurtenance thereto, including without limitation any such trailer, semitrailer, container, or other associated equipment, or the cargo being transported therein or thereon, shall upon conviction be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years, a fine not less than $50,000.00 nor more than $200,000.00, or both such fine and imprisonment. For purposes of this subsection, the term "vehicle" includes without limitation any railcar.
• (g) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this Code section, a person convicted of an offense described in paragraph (4) of subsection (a) of this Code section shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years.
• (h) Any person who commits the offense of aggravated assault involving the use of a firearm upon a student or teacher or other school personnel within a school safety zone as defined in Code Section 16-11-127.1 shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years.
• (i) If the offense of aggravated assault is committed between past or present spouses, persons who are parents of the same child, parents and children, stepparents and stepchildren, foster parents and foster children, or other persons excluding siblings living or formerly living in the same household, the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three nor more than 20 years.
• (j) Any person who commits the offense of aggravated assault with intent to rape against a child under the age of 14 years shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than 25 nor more than 50 years. Any person convicted under this subsection shall, in addition, be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Section 17-10-6.2.
• (k) A person who knowingly commits the offense of aggravated assault upon an officer of the court while such officer is engaged in, or on account of the performance of, his or her official duties shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years.

Now please, cite the specific law that justified Arbery attacking McMichaels with evidence from the video.

Go ahead new player

LOLOL

a) Brandishing a firearm during a dispute is illegal in Georgia...

​

Georgia senators are pursuing a bill that would make it legal to brandish a gun during a dispute.​

​

The bill put forth by state Sen. Tyler Harper passed out of committee Monday, and would allow residents to pull a gun if they feel threatened, so long as they don’t aim it at anybody.​

​

Under current Georgia law, brandishing a firearm can earn a felony aggravated assault charge, carrying a sentence of up 20 years, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.​

b) You forgot to post your evidence that Travis wasn't pointing his shotgun at Arbery.....

Sign. Another lesson in the dictionary for you.

bran•dish brăn′dĭsh
►

• transitive verb
  To wave or flourish (something, often a weapon) in a menacing, defiant, or excited way. synonym: flourish.
• n.
  A menacing, defiant, or excited wave or flourish of something.
• 
  To move or wave, as a weapon; raise and move in various directions; shake or flourish about: as, to brandish a sword or a cane.

Try having a clue what words mean before you use them genius not after. No weapon was ever brandished at your thief anywhere in that video. The dictionary wins again.

 

[progressive hunter]

New video released of Ahmaud Arbery's confrontation with cops when approached in a park

A 2017 video has emerged showing slain Georgia man Ahmaud Arbery angrily confronting cops in a park, with an aggressive officer pulling his Taser.

www.bizpacreview.com

This video shows Arbery disrespect the cops, refused to take commands a couple of times, tazer malfunctioned, to bad.
This kid obviously has some issues, stemming from his parenting, I think that’s a females jacket he’s wearing, he’s exposing his underwear in a public park.

he almost attacked the cops just doing his job

the area is known for drugs and but AA couldn’t understand what he was saying.

So?

What does a video taken years ago have to do with him being hunted then murdered by men who aren't police?

And if it's ok for them to do that because of something Arbery did years ago, is it ok to hunt down and murder the trump followers in the video below years from now for yelling at and swearing at the police?



Or is it just ok to do that to a black man?

The racial divide in America is just red meat for you communist russian trolls to use to divide America and manipulate the stupid trump followers.

It doesn't work with the rest of America. We're not stupid.

By the way, how's the weather today in moscow comrade?

it goes to establish a pattern of violence and disrespect for the police and authority figures,,,

your video shows free people demanding their rights be restored from a fascist government,,,

So white men are automatically authority figures over black men, WTF is this, 1940.

an authority figure is anyone taking control of a situation,,,

only a racist would think its what you said,,,

So if I pull a gun on you and tell you to get your ass on the ground, am I a authority figure?

He was hanging out in a known drug trafficking area.

And that gives the cops the right to violate his civil rights?

Remember when he was the "peaceful jogger"? Boy, that narrative sure fell apart.

Not really. He was committed no crime. He was minding his own business in a park. A cop decided to search him "just because" and when he got irate about it, another cop tried to use a taser on him (which malfunctioned).

If anyone looks worse for this, it's law enforcement.

You'd have to wonder what these cops would have tried to pull if they weren't required to wear body cams.

So why did he get all bent out of shape if he wasnt doing anything?

Was he arrested?

Why would they arrest him if he wasnt doing anything wrong?
And that of course brings to question. If he wasnt doing anything wrong why'd he get all worked up?
You show the cop your ID and everyone goes away happy.
Dudes just another knappy headed dumbass with a chip on his shoulder.

Why would they even stop him if he wasn't doing anything wrong?

Well you know you usually get pissed off when folks are harassing you and you aren't doing anything wrong.

Well you know you racist love to see the police messing with black men, because that is usually the only way you cowards can do it.

Man if you're truly this stupid it's no wonder you morons have constant run ins with the PO PO.

Well moron the stupidity is you cowards.

YOUR NOT????

you got the gun not me,,,

 

[texmaster]

So? Were there cops present when he was assaulted by the vigilante McMichaels?

You really need to educate yourself on the terms you use. Arbery assaulted McMichaels not the other way around.

If you really need yet another lesson in the law I'll be happy to provide it.

Actually. I live in Georgia. So chances are that I know the terms I am using. But I am not alone.

The Ahmaud Arbery Killing and Georgia Law

Explaining the legal issues surrounding the incident of two white men shooting a black jogger they suspected of a crime

arcdigital.media

That is written by an experienced defense attorney in Georgia who has handled capital cases before. So what qualifications do you have? Are you a lawyer with experience in Georgia? Otherwise I do not think you are in a position to teach.

Its pretty clear you don't.

Let's review the law itself.

2010 Georgia Code
TITLE 16 - CRIMES AND OFFENSES
CHAPTER 5 - CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
ARTICLE 2 - ASSAULT AND BATTERY
§ 16-5-20 - Simple assault
O.C.G.A. 16-5-20 (2010)
16-5-20. Simple assault


(a) A person commits the offense of simple assault when he or she either:

(1) Attempts to commit a violent injury to the person of another; or

(2) Commits an act which places another in reasonable apprehension of immediately receiving a violent injury.

(b) Except as provided in subsections (c) through (h) of this Code section, a person who commits the offense of simple assault shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

(c) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault in a public transit vehicle or station shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. For purposes of this Code section, "public transit vehicle" means a bus, van, or rail car used for the transportation of passengers within a system which receives a subsidy from tax revenues or is operated under a franchise contract with a county or municipality of this state.

(d) If the offense of simple assault is committed between past or present spouses, persons who are parents of the same child, parents and children, stepparents and stepchildren, foster parents and foster children, or other persons excluding siblings living or formerly living in the same household, the defendant shall be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. In no event shall this subsection be applicable to corporal punishment administered by a parent or guardian to a child or administered by a person acting in loco parentis.

(e) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault against a person who is 65 years of age or older shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.

(f) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault against an employee of a public school system of this state while such employee is engaged in official duties or on school property shall, upon conviction of such offense, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. For purposes of this Code section, "school property" shall include public school buses and stops for public school buses as designated by local school boards of education.

(g) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault against a female who is pregnant at the time of the offense shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.

(h) Nothing in this Code section shall be construed to permit the prosecution of:

(1) Any person for conduct relating to an abortion for which the consent of the pregnant woman, or person authorized by law to act on her behalf, has been obtained or for which such consent is implied by law;

(2) Any person for any medical treatment of the pregnant woman or her unborn child; or

(3) Any woman with respect to her unborn child.

For the purposes of this subsection, the term "unborn child" means a member of the species homo sapiens at any stage of development who is carried in the womb.



Now, go ahead and point to any part of that law based on the video where Arbury was assaulted.

I can easily point to where he was guilty of assault:

(1) Attempts to commit a violent injury to the person of another;

Your thief is on video attacking McMichaels without anyone moving toward him or raising any weapon at him.


Go ahead, can't wait to see this dance

First, nothing was stolen. So my “thief” as you say, stole nothing. That kind of means he wasn’t stealing, and therefore was not a thief. But wait, there is more to consider.

He stole a 65 inch TV. He's a thief. Try having a clue about the history of the moron you are defending.

Yay, you can quote the text of the law.

Unlike you yes I can.

But the Courts decide what the law means, and how it is applied to cases. Those decisions are called Precedence. In Georgia, the precedence including decisions in the State Supreme Court means that the McMichaels are in a seriously deep pit of trouble.

So you are running once again from citing the part of the law with the video that backs you up. This is my shocked face you ran once again.

Here’s the thing about justification: you typically cannot raise it if you are the “aggressor” or if you “provoke the use of force” with the intent to use that force as an excuse. To use deadly force, the other person must pose a deadly risk.

So the big issue with the defendant’s case here is that they pointed guns at Arbery. We know this because, according to one District Attorney’s memo, the first shot went through Arbery’s hand as he was trying to grab the barrel. In Georgia, pointing a gun at someone is aggravated assault even if you had no intent to intimidate them.

LOL. The shot did not go through him until he attacked. There is ZERO video evidence of him firing before Arbery was on him. You are once again making up facts that don't exist.

The McMichaels will have to establish that they were in the middle of a lawful arrest when the assault began, and that will be difficult because they escalated force so quickly. Or they will have to establish that they made a “reasonable mistake of fact” that led them to believe their actions were justified. But that’s tricky, because their response was far from ordinary. Or they will have to show that it was reasonable to point weapons at an unarmed person in an effort to get him to stop — a ruling you would probably not want extended to muggers. So using precedence according to the aforementioned Experienced Defense Attorney who has argued capital cases on appeal before, the McMichaels don’t have much of a case. The chances are very very slim that they can prove the shooting was justified.

LOL They do not have to justify anything when your thief was the attacker. And you can't be in the middle of an arrest if you make no attempt to detain the person. Do you need a lesson in legal detainment as well in the law? I thought you pretended to understand law in Georgia. You keep proving you don't have a clue.

You like many others, start the dance of who committed what crime at the moment that Arbury is rounding the truck. Unfortunately the events start long before that. And those events mean that the McMichaels were the aggressors, and that is why they are charged in full compliance with the laws.

Because that is what we can see. You want to rely on nothing but fantasy and theory for justification with NO basis in the laws of self defense to support you and you prove it each time you run away from citing the actual law and action they took you can prove on video that supports you.

That's why you keep losing this debate.

 

[SavannahMann]

So? Were there cops present when he was assaulted by the vigilante McMichaels?

You really need to educate yourself on the terms you use. Arbery assaulted McMichaels not the other way around.

If you really need yet another lesson in the law I'll be happy to provide it.

Actually. I live in Georgia. So chances are that I know the terms I am using. But I am not alone.

The Ahmaud Arbery Killing and Georgia Law

Explaining the legal issues surrounding the incident of two white men shooting a black jogger they suspected of a crime

arcdigital.media

That is written by an experienced defense attorney in Georgia who has handled capital cases before. So what qualifications do you have? Are you a lawyer with experience in Georgia? Otherwise I do not think you are in a position to teach.

Its pretty clear you don't.

Let's review the law itself.

2010 Georgia Code
TITLE 16 - CRIMES AND OFFENSES
CHAPTER 5 - CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
ARTICLE 2 - ASSAULT AND BATTERY
§ 16-5-20 - Simple assault
O.C.G.A. 16-5-20 (2010)
16-5-20. Simple assault


(a) A person commits the offense of simple assault when he or she either:

(1) Attempts to commit a violent injury to the person of another; or

(2) Commits an act which places another in reasonable apprehension of immediately receiving a violent injury.

(b) Except as provided in subsections (c) through (h) of this Code section, a person who commits the offense of simple assault shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

(c) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault in a public transit vehicle or station shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. For purposes of this Code section, "public transit vehicle" means a bus, van, or rail car used for the transportation of passengers within a system which receives a subsidy from tax revenues or is operated under a franchise contract with a county or municipality of this state.

(d) If the offense of simple assault is committed between past or present spouses, persons who are parents of the same child, parents and children, stepparents and stepchildren, foster parents and foster children, or other persons excluding siblings living or formerly living in the same household, the defendant shall be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. In no event shall this subsection be applicable to corporal punishment administered by a parent or guardian to a child or administered by a person acting in loco parentis.

(e) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault against a person who is 65 years of age or older shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.

(f) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault against an employee of a public school system of this state while such employee is engaged in official duties or on school property shall, upon conviction of such offense, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. For purposes of this Code section, "school property" shall include public school buses and stops for public school buses as designated by local school boards of education.

(g) Any person who commits the offense of simple assault against a female who is pregnant at the time of the offense shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.

(h) Nothing in this Code section shall be construed to permit the prosecution of:

(1) Any person for conduct relating to an abortion for which the consent of the pregnant woman, or person authorized by law to act on her behalf, has been obtained or for which such consent is implied by law;

(2) Any person for any medical treatment of the pregnant woman or her unborn child; or

(3) Any woman with respect to her unborn child.

For the purposes of this subsection, the term "unborn child" means a member of the species homo sapiens at any stage of development who is carried in the womb.



Now, go ahead and point to any part of that law based on the video where Arbury was assaulted.

I can easily point to where he was guilty of assault:

(1) Attempts to commit a violent injury to the person of another;

Your thief is on video attacking McMichaels without anyone moving toward him or raising any weapon at him.


Go ahead, can't wait to see this dance

First, nothing was stolen. So my “thief” as you say, stole nothing. That kind of means he wasn’t stealing, and therefore was not a thief. But wait, there is more to consider.

He stole a 65 inch TV. He's a thief. Try having a clue about the history of the moron you are defending.

Yay, you can quote the text of the law.

Unlike you yes I can.

But the Courts decide what the law means, and how it is applied to cases. Those decisions are called Precedence. In Georgia, the precedence including decisions in the State Supreme Court means that the McMichaels are in a seriously deep pit of trouble.

So you are running once again from citing the part of the law with the video that backs you up. This is my shocked face you ran once again.

Here’s the thing about justification: you typically cannot raise it if you are the “aggressor” or if you “provoke the use of force” with the intent to use that force as an excuse. To use deadly force, the other person must pose a deadly risk.

So the big issue with the defendant’s case here is that they pointed guns at Arbery. We know this because, according to one District Attorney’s memo, the first shot went through Arbery’s hand as he was trying to grab the barrel. In Georgia, pointing a gun at someone is aggravated assault even if you had no intent to intimidate them.

LOL. The shot did not go through him until he attacked. There is ZERO video evidence of him firing before Arbery was on him. You are once again making up facts that don't exist.

The McMichaels will have to establish that they were in the middle of a lawful arrest when the assault began, and that will be difficult because they escalated force so quickly. Or they will have to establish that they made a “reasonable mistake of fact” that led them to believe their actions were justified. But that’s tricky, because their response was far from ordinary. Or they will have to show that it was reasonable to point weapons at an unarmed person in an effort to get him to stop — a ruling you would probably not want extended to muggers. So using precedence according to the aforementioned Experienced Defense Attorney who has argued capital cases on appeal before, the McMichaels don’t have much of a case. The chances are very very slim that they can prove the shooting was justified.

LOL They do not have to justify anything when your thief was the attacker. And you can't be in the middle of an arrest if you make no attempt to detain the person. Do you need a lesson in legal detainment as well in the law? I thought you pretended to understand law in Georgia. You keep proving you don't have a clue.

You like many others, start the dance of who committed what crime at the moment that Arbury is rounding the truck. Unfortunately the events start long before that. And those events mean that the McMichaels were the aggressors, and that is why they are charged in full compliance with the laws.

Because that is what we can see. You want to rely on nothing but fantasy and theory for justification with NO basis in the laws of self defense to support you and you prove it each time you run away from citing the actual law and action they took you can prove on video that supports you.

That's why you keep losing this debate.

Interesting. According to you I am losing the debate. According to lawyers in Georgia and the cops who just arrested the neighbor for being a part of this debacle. I am not losing. The trial will be the deciding factor. There all you internet experts are going to whip out your law degrees from Cracker Jack University and sweat it is all wrong.

 

[JoeB131]

The professor was arrested for belligerence and noncooperation with police who were just doing their job

He had no key and no documentation linking him to that house

Here, let me help you out, because you are kind of dopey.

Henry Louis Gates arrest controversy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Crowley's report states that he believed Gates was lawfully in the residence, but that he was surprised and confused by Gates' behavior, which included a threat that Crowley did not know who he was "messing with." Crowley then asked Gates for a photo ID so as to verify he was the resident of the house; Gates initially refused, but then did supply his Harvard University identification card. Crowley wrote that Gates repeatedly shouted requests for his identification. Crowley then told Gates that he was leaving his residence and that if Gates wanted to continue discussing the matter, he would speak to him outside. Gates replied, "Yeah, I'll speak with your mama outside." On the 9-1-1 dispatcher audio recordings, a man's loud voice is heard in the background at several points during Sgt. Crowley's transmissions.[13]

Gates's account of the events first appeared in The Root on July 20. According to the statement, Gates saw Crowley at the door as he was speaking to the Harvard Real Estate Office to have his front door fixed. When he opened the front door, Crowley immediately asked him to step outside. Gates did not comply and asked Crowley why he was there. When told that Crowley was a police officer investigating a reported breaking and entering, Gates replied that it was his house, and he was a Harvard faculty member. Crowley asked Gates whether he could prove it; Gates told him he could, and turned to go to the kitchen to fetch his wallet. Crowley followed him into the house. Gates then handed Crowley his Harvard University ID and a current driver's license, both including his photograph, the license also giving his address.[14]

Gates then asked Crowley for his name and badge number, but Crowley did not respond. Following repeated requests for Crowley's name and badge number, the officer left the kitchen; Gates followed him to the front door. As he stepped out the front door and asked the other officers for Crowley's name and badge number, Crowley said, "Thank you for accommodating my earlier request," and arrested Gates on his front porch.[14]


So at the time he was arrested.

They had established he was the home-owner.
They had established his identity.
He was arrested for "Contempt of cop".

 

[Mac-7]

They had established he was the home-owner.
They had established his identity.
He was arrested for "Contempt of cop".

Thats partislly true and partially untrue

The ID gates used had his harvard address instead of the address of the house

but clearly gates was belligerent and uncooperative

Surely a man of his high position had better things to do than verbally assault an honest cop who was just doing his job

and yes, that is called disturbing the peace

 

[JoeB131]

Thats partislly true and partially untrue

The ID gates used had his harvard address instead of the address of the house

but clearly gates was belligerent and uncooperative

Surely a man of his high position had better things to do than verbally assault an honest cop who was just doing his job

and yes, that is called disturbing the peace

Um, no, it was completely true. They had Established his identity and that this was his house. Also, common sense should tell you a well-dressed, middle aged and well-spoken man isn't a perp.

He had every right to speak his mind if he felt his rights and dignity were being violated.

The Police acted stupidly. Obama was right.