New Trump Indictment Says He Ordered Mar-a-Lago Camera Footage Deleted

[Lesh]

haha nope.,...there is no impeachment inquiry into Hunter Biden...geez

And yet oddly everything seems to be about “the Biden family”

Generally Hunter and never Joe

 

[struth]

Remarkably, you really are this stupid.

haha it's pretty obvious you are projecting...hahahh

 

[struth]

And yet oddly everything seems to be about “the Biden family”

Generally Hunter and never Joe

Hunter is part of the family, so yes, he certainly is a big part of it.

 

[The5thHorseman]

haha it's pretty obvious you are projecting...hahahh

If there is no evidence "yet", what does that tell you about the state of evidence now?

 

[Lesh]

Hunter is part of the family, so yes, he certainly is a big part of it.

But he AIN’T Joe

 

[g5000]

And yet oddly everything seems to be about “the Biden family”

Generally Hunter and never Joe

I was just mentioning that rhetorical trick the Republicans have crafted to hoax the rubes.

"The Bidens". "The Bidens" or "the Biden family" were paid this or that by the commies, and so forth.

This deliberately gives the rubes the impression that Joe Biden is included in that phrase, and this leads them to bleev Joe Biden received money from the commies, and thus they bleev there is evidence of Joe Biden's guilt.

But in fact, when the hoaxsters say "The Bidens", they are talking about Hunter Biden and other family members, not Joe Biden.

"The Bidens" has the wonderful quality of implying Joe Biden while having an out for not actually naming Joe Biden.

This is how sick and twisted these House Republican clowns are.

 

[g5000]

But anyway...Trump was paying for the IT guy's lawyer. That's Trump's way of ensuring loyalty. He's done that for a lot of people who could be witnesses against him.

However, the IT guy figured out he was going to have to commit perjury if he was going to accept Trump's money. So he did the right thing and ditched the Trump lawyer and got his own.

Good for him.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I was just mentioning that rhetorical trick the Republicans have crafted to hoax the rubes.

"The Bidens". "The Bidens" or "the Biden family" were paid this or that by the commies, and so forth.

This deliberately gives the rubes the impression that Joe Biden is included in that phrase, and this leads them to bleev Joe Biden received money from the commies, and thus they bleev there is evidence of Joe Biden's guilt.

But in fact, when the hoaxsters say "The Bidens", they are talking about Hunter Biden and other family members, not Joe Biden.

"The Bidens" has the wonderful quality of implying Joe Biden while having an out for not actually naming Joe Biden.

This is how sick and twisted these House Republican clowns are.

Easiest con ever. They line up to be lied to.

 

[struth]

But he AIN’T Joe

Yeah...I know...not sure your point. Sammy the Bull wasn't John Gotti either...they are two different people...what's your point?

 

[struth]

If there is no evidence "yet", what does that tell you about the state of evidence now?

that the GOP shouldn't impeach him yet, see where the inquiry goes. Nobody wants to see an impeachment based on parody again.

 

[The5thHorseman]

that the GOP shouldn't impeach him yet, see where the inquiry goes. Nobody wants to see an impeachment based on parody again.

Try again.

 

[struth]

Try again.

sorry, that doesn't fit your false narrative....the one you just got caught on.

 

[The5thHorseman]

sorry, that doesn't fit your false narrative....the one you just got caught on.

If there is no evidence yet, there is no evidence now.

Nod.

 

[struth]

If there is no evidence yet, there is no evidence now.

Nod.

to bring formal impeachment charges...agreed. Hence why the inquiry is going on to see if anything else will be uncovered.

 

[Marener]

The White House is under investigation, of course they have everything to do with it and the obstruction

Why are you changing the subject?

 

[bripat9643]

If there is no evidence yet, there is no evidence now.

Nod.

There is plenty of evidence. The Repubs just want an ironclad case before they go to trial.

 

[struth]

Why are you changing the subject?

I am not. I thought we were talking about obstruction

 

[Marener]

I am not. I thought we were talking about obstruction

We were talking about Trump.

Sad you can’t stay on topic. I guess Trump is just that hard to defend.

Start a thread on Biden if you want. This isn’t the thread for discussing it.

 

[bripat9643]

We were talking about Trump.

Sad you can’t stay on topic. I guess Trump is just that hard to defend.

Start a thread on Biden if you want. This isn’t the thread for discussing it.

You mean Biden is that hard to defend. You obviously can't bear to take about him.

 

[Marener]

You mean Biden is that hard to defend. You obviously can't bear to take about him.

I’ve talked about him in tons of threads where the topic is Biden.

This is not the thread.

Did you read the title of the thread, or was that too much work for you?