New study shows Ivermectin lowers death rates by 92%.

[john doe 101]

And the left called it “horse dewormer” and mocked anyone that tried to use it.

New ivermectin study shows 92% lower chance of COVID death

A large study on the impact of using ivermectin as a prophylaxis for COVID-19 found that regular users of the drug experienced up to a 92% reduction in mortality compared to those who did not.

www.clarkcountytoday.com

I’m sure the usual Big Pharma suspects will be along to shill for Pfizer.

Take it. Please.

 

[theHawk]

Take it. Please.

If I ever catch WuFlu and feel bad, I will.

But still a pure blood to this day. Never infected, never vaxxed.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

If I ever catch WuFlu and feel bad, I will.

But still a pure blood to this day. Never infected, never vaxxed.

I am glad you are OK. But still your decision is not rational.

 

[theHawk]

I am glad you are OK. But still your decision is not rational.

It is irrational to take an experimental vaccine that has no long term studies. Especially when the virus it is supposed to protect you from has less than a 1% chance to kill your demographic. Then throw on all the terrible adverse reactions and deaths we’ve all witnessed. Plus it doesn’t even work, providing no long term immunity at all, because it never gives you exposure to the virus, it simply artificially makes you create antibodies for a short while. In fact, to even call it a “vaccine” is incorrect.

 

[Dragonlady]

And the left called it “horse dewormer” and mocked anyone that tried to use it.

New ivermectin study shows 92% lower chance of COVID death

A large study on the impact of using ivermectin as a prophylaxis for COVID-19 found that regular users of the drug experienced up to a 92% reduction in mortality compared to those who did not.

www.clarkcountytoday.com

I’m sure the usual Big Pharma suspects will be along to shill for Pfizer.

This is not a peer reviewed study. This is some doctor in Brazil posting on Twitter.

 

[Dragonlady]

It is irrational to take an experimental vaccine that has no long term studies. Especially when the virus it is supposed to protect you from has less than a 1% chance to kill your demographic. Then throw on all the terrible adverse reactions and deaths we’ve all witnessed. Plus it doesn’t even work, providing no long term immunity at all, because it never gives you exposure to the virus, it simply artificially makes you create antibodies for a short while. In fact, to even call it a “vaccine” is incorrect.

We have no long term studies on the results of getting covid either. Early indications are positively scary.

Cancer doctors are reporting higher than second cancers in those who have had covid. A lot higher. Also high incidences of dementia.

The MNRA vaccines have been tested and studied for more than 20 years. They were developed after the 2002/2003 SARS outbreaks, but there were no outbreaks large enough for large mass testing until covid. That far more testing than has been done on ANY vaccine in history, prior to its use. As for long term implications, we've need to wait 10 years for that data. When have we EVER done that???

It is far more irrational to risk infection by an unknown virus with unknown long term implications than to take a safe vaccine and reduce your risk.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It is irrational to take an experimental vaccine that has no long term studies. Especially when the virus it is supposed to protect you from has less than a 1% chance to kill your demographic. Then throw on all the terrible adverse reactions and deaths we’ve all witnessed. Plus it doesn’t even work, providing no long term immunity at all, because it never gives you exposure to the virus, it simply artificially makes you create antibodies for a short while. In fact, to even call it a “vaccine” is incorrect.

The numbers do not reflect your belief, but you are well and that's good. Get the jab.

 

[badger2]

The numbers do not reflect your belief, but you are well and that's good. Get the jab.

You can't argue for numbers without having to face these parameters which are confounded by the diversity of reactions in a collective of genomes to this non-vaccine:

"Not everyone is getting the same dose"

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You can't argue for numbers without having to face these parameters which are confounded by the diversity of reactions in a collective of genomes to this non-vaccine:

"Not everyone is getting the same dose"

And, yet, we are much more healthy as a people than if we did not have the vax.

 

[badger2]

And, yet, we are much more healthy as a people than if we did not have the vax.

Not buying a lab-made virus that forces health on the prisoners while the Pimp makes billions.

 

[badger2]

RFK Jr. 2024

Other suspicions in the pathology are identity of the "vaccines" themselves:
"Comirnaty is not Pfizer BioNTech"

"Comirnaty" is not the "Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine"

Whatever is being used in the United States, it's not the licensed product...

modarnlife.substack.com

'....Meryl Nass and RFK Jr. have been covering this subject from the beginning.'

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Not buying a lab-made virus that forces health on the prisoners while the Pimp makes billions.

That's your right. That means you cannot assert a constitutional right to work in certain settings or associate with certain peoples.

 

[theHawk]

We have no long term studies on the results of getting covid either. Early indications are positively scary.

Cancer doctors are reporting higher than second cancers in those who have had covid. A lot higher. Also high incidences of dementia.

The MNRA vaccines have been tested and studied for more than 20 years. They were developed after the 2002/2003 SARS outbreaks, but there were no outbreaks large enough for large mass testing until covid. That far more testing than has been done on ANY vaccine in history, prior to its use. As for long term implications, we've need to wait 10 years for that data. When have we EVER done that???

It is far more irrational to risk infection by an unknown virus with unknown long term implications than to take a safe vaccine and reduce your risk.

Wrong, cancer numbers are up for vaxxies.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Wrong, cancer numbers are up for vaxxies.

...because far more are vaxxed. The % per capita has in fact dropped.

 

[Dragonlady]

Wrong, cancer numbers are up for vaxxies.

Says who?? One of the vaccinated and boosted liars on FOX?

I googled the question. Every fact checker out there, and every hospital study says that’s a lie.

 

[Puma Punku]

Any intellectually honest person should now ask themselves some questions. Is it possible that ivermectin could have been used with little risk? Is it possible that thousands of lives could have been saved with proper use? Why was there so much "pushback" that actually got qualified doctors censored, while restricting any prescriptions be made or filled out? "They" made sure that we were not going to get this (extremely safe) drug....no matter what our doctors (or us) wanted. Hell, we couldn't even talk about it on social media. Have we ever seen anything like this???? IMHO countless lives could have been saved, and that smirking little rat Fauci knew it. After all he could have publicly debated the issue with other doctors..but he never, never ever did.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

"They" made sure because there is no peer reviewed contextual testing that does anything you say it does.

 

[easyt65]

And the left called it “horse dewormer” and mocked anyone that tried to use it.

New ivermectin study shows 92% lower chance of COVID death

A large study on the impact of using ivermectin as a prophylaxis for COVID-19 found that regular users of the drug experienced up to a 92% reduction in mortality compared to those who did not.

www.clarkcountytoday.com

I’m sure the usual Big Pharma suspects will be along to shill for Pfizer.

If this were a govt-run shadow-banning / censoring social media web site you would be SO SILENCED right now.

 

[Burgermeister]

If Ivermectin was approved as a treatment, as it should have been, then the vaxxes would not have gotten emergency use authorization. So much lethal criminality to go around.

 

[Dragonlady]

You can't argue for numbers without having to face these parameters which are confounded by the diversity of reactions in a collective of genomes to this non-vaccine:

"Not everyone is getting the same dose"

Once again, Twitter is not a valid source of real information.