New Congresswomen Lauren Bohbert Says New Bill Makes Gays and Transvestites Supreme to Everyone Else

Indeependent

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
51,474
Reaction score
13,285
Points
2,180
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.
You explain too. See post #56.
so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?
Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot
You fucking articulate
Go fuck yourself old man.What are your pronouns today?
TPP has proven time and again that he never looks at the entire flowchart of any given idea.
 

Ringtone

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
3,040
Reaction score
914
Points
210
So don't bake the cake - And please stop whining incessantly. Oh - And fix your sig please. Highly annoying
Oh, so now you're pretending not understand the real-world outcomes. Hot damn, you're a phony ass!
 

San Souci

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,984
Points
1,940
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.
You explain too. See post #56.
so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?
Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot
You fucking articulate
You have not yet explained why a non-heterosexual is not considered an American in the face of current law.
Actually they are. That is the trouble.
 

San Souci

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,984
Points
1,940
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.
You explain too. See post #56.
so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?
Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot
You fucking articulate
Your Avatar name is an oxymoron. So called "Progressives" are all traitor Anarchists.
 

Ringtone

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
3,040
Reaction score
914
Points
210
is the gov'ment making you turn gay?
Are you on dope?

By what right does the government compel a homosexual business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky?
 

playtime

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
35,096
Reaction score
20,201
Points
2,945
is the gov'ment making you turn gay?
Are you on dope?

By what right does the government compel a homosexual business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky?
^ ' Are you on dope: '

lol.... nope.

' By what right does the government compel a homosexual business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky? '

Fourteenth Amendment
Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 5
The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.



^^^ that ^^^
 

TheProgressivePatriot

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
17,982
Reaction score
3,424
Points
290
Location
The commie infested, queer loving liberal NE USA
Holy fucking shit you are a hopeless case. Just more of the same evasive bullshit! What the fuck are you talking about? You are completely unable to actually explain what the negative consequenses of the equality act would look like IN THE REAL WORLD. Cut the fucking bullshit and answere the question. I am not overwhelmed. I am underwhelmed by your bullshit. Try some fucking honesty and clarity! I keep asking you to give specific examples of what you are taking about and I get is theoretical gobbidy gook that explains nothing. How is the law infringing on your right to free associate .Stop being a coward and answer the question.
Calm down, Sunshine.

By what right does the government compel a homosexual business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky?

Thanks.
OK Slick. Two can play the same game of answering questions with another question

What right does ANY business ower- who offers good or services to the general public - to discrimiant by refusing service to ANYONE who walks through the door? If that business can in fact arbitrarily refuse service to any one for any reason, what are the implications for an orderly andcivil society?
How do we function as a society if no one can be sure that they will not be humiliated when they enter a business? You mightalso want to consider the fact that the original civil rights act, as well as numerous state laws against discrimination were never sucsessfully challanged on constitutional grounds. Why do you think that is. ?

And, you never answered this. Do you or do you not support laws prohibiting discrimination against other minorities, or is it only laws protecting LBGT people that you have a problem with?

And you never responded to this either. Please explain EXACTLY how the Equality Act would infringe on parental rights with respect to consent and authority. Please be specic. Give examples of what you fear will happen. What parental rights are we talking about? What specific provision of the act are you referring to?

Give it a try hot shot
 

TheProgressivePatriot

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
17,982
Reaction score
3,424
Points
290
Location
The commie infested, queer loving liberal NE USA
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.
You explain too. See post #56.
so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?
Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot
You fucking articulate
Your Avatar name is an oxymoron. So called "Progressives" are all traitor Anarchists.
Oh please! Give a fucking break with that trite bovine excrement , Was Teddy Roosevelt a traitor and anarchist?
 

DrLove

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
28,121
Reaction score
11,430
Points
950
Location
Central Oregon Coast
Holy fucking shit you are a hopeless case. Just more of the same evasive bullshit! What the fuck are you talking about? You are completely unable to actually explain what the negative consequenses of the equality act would look like IN THE REAL WORLD. Cut the fucking bullshit and answere the question. I am not overwhelmed. I am underwhelmed by your bullshit. Try some fucking honesty and clarity! I keep asking you to give specific examples of what you are taking about and I get is theoretical gobbidy gook that explains nothing. How is the law infringing on your right to free associate .Stop being a coward and answer the question.
Calm down, Sunshine.

By what right does the government compel a homosexual business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky?

Thanks.
OK Slick. Two can play the same game of answering questions with another question

What right does ANY business ower- who offers good or services to the general public - to discrimiant by refusing service to ANYONE who walks through the door? If that business can in fact arbitrarily refuse service to any one for any reason, what are the implications for an orderly andcivil society?
How do we function as a society if no one can be sure that they will not be humiliated when they enter a business? You mightalso want to consider the fact that the original civil rights act, as well as numerous state laws against discrimination were never sucsessfully challanged on constitutional grounds. Why do you think that is. ?

And, you never answered this. Do you or do you not support laws prohibiting discrimination against other minorities, or is it only laws protecting LBGT people that you have a problem with?

And you never responded to this either. Please explain EXACTLY how the Equality Act would infringe on parental rights with respect to consent and authority. Please be specic. Give examples of what you fear will happen. What parental rights are we talking about? What specific provision of the act are you referring to?

Give it a try hot shot
That one is certainly annoying ;)
 

Polishprince

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
29,144
Reaction score
15,183
Points
1,415
What right does ANY business ower- who offers good or services to the general public - to discrimiant by refusing service to ANYONE who walks through the door? If that business can in fact arbitrarily refuse service to any one for any reason, what are the implications for an orderly andcivil society?
How do we function as a society if no one can be sure that they will not be humiliated when they enter a business? You mightalso want to consider the fact that the original civil rights act, as well as numerous state laws against discrimination were never sucsessfully challanged on constitutional grounds. Why do you think that is. ?

It isn't "arbitrary" at all. People get refused service in a classy joint if they aren't wearing a jacket and tie, they get refused at a black cocktail lounge if they appear in their sheets. Why is it considered off the radar that a man in a dress should be told to get lost?

As far as the bakers in Oregon, they didn't refuse service at all. The homo customers asked for a product (Gay Marriage Cake) that they didn't carry.
 

TheProgressivePatriot

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
17,982
Reaction score
3,424
Points
290
Location
The commie infested, queer loving liberal NE USA
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.
So you don't know what the actual outcomes would be. You're not cognizant of the outrageous violations of First-Amendment liberties and property rights this legislation portends, or cognizant of the judicial shitstorm that would arise if it were passed by the Senate and signed into law?

That's what I thought.

You hear the word equal and get a weepy, snot-stained hankey feeling. Hot damn, leftist politicians love useful idiots like you!

But, then, you in all likelihood are a rank narcissist or sociopath, so you wouldn't give a damn about the violation of others' natural rights anyway.

After all, you're a leftist, aren't you? You're a statist bootlick of collectivist, mobocratic rule, right?
I know what the outcome would be!

Liberty Counsel Falsely Claims Equality Act Would Force Religious Schools to Hire Pedophiles and 'Goat Lovers' | Right Wing Watch

Religious-right fearmongering about the Equality Act, which would add sexual orientation and gender identity protections to federal civil rights laws, has been increasingly extreme around Thursday’s vote in the House of Representatives, which passed the legislation on a 224-206 vote. Today, an email from Mat Staver of the stridently anti-LGBTQ Liberty Counsel declared that if the Equality Act became law, “schools [that] refuse to hire a crossdresser, a pedophile or a goat lover” would be “penalized.”
:up::up::up:
 

Polishprince

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
29,144
Reaction score
15,183
Points
1,415
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.
So you don't know what the actual outcomes would be. You're not cognizant of the outrageous violations of First-Amendment liberties and property rights this legislation portends, or cognizant of the judicial shitstorm that would arise if it were passed by the Senate and signed into law?

That's what I thought.

You hear the word equal and get a weepy, snot-stained hankey feeling. Hot damn, leftist politicians love useful idiots like you!

But, then, you in all likelihood are a rank narcissist or sociopath, so you wouldn't give a damn about the violation of others' natural rights anyway.

After all, you're a leftist, aren't you? You're a statist bootlick of collectivist, mobocratic rule, right?
I know what the outcome would be!

Liberty Counsel Falsely Claims Equality Act Would Force Religious Schools to Hire Pedophiles and 'Goat Lovers' | Right Wing Watch

Religious-right fearmongering about the Equality Act, which would add sexual orientation and gender identity protections to federal civil rights laws, has been increasingly extreme around Thursday’s vote in the House of Representatives, which passed the legislation on a 224-206 vote. Today, an email from Mat Staver of the stridently anti-LGBTQ Liberty Counsel declared that if the Equality Act became law, “schools [that] refuse to hire a crossdresser, a pedophile or a goat lover” would be “penalized.”
:up::up::up:

How can you say its a "false claim"?

Paedophilia as well as goat fucking are perverted sexual preferences as well. It would be tough to deny those folks their "rights" if you give the rights to She Males and Cross Dressers.
 

TheProgressivePatriot

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
17,982
Reaction score
3,424
Points
290
Location
The commie infested, queer loving liberal NE USA
It isn't "arbitrary" at all. People get refused service in a classy joint if they aren't wearing a jacket and tie, they get refused at a black cocktail lounge if they appear in their sheets. Why is it considered off the radar that a man in a dress should be told to get lost?
False equivalency logical fallacy. A dress code applies equally to all. It is not a public accomodation issue
 

San Souci

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,984
Points
1,940
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.
You explain too. See post #56.
so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?
Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot
You fucking articulate
Your Avatar name is an oxymoron. So called "Progressives" are all traitor Anarchists.
Oh please! Give a fucking break with that trite bovine excrement , Was Teddy Roosevelt a traitor and anarchist?
So? Ya want a parallel? With Teddy? Well ,he busted up "Trusts" because JP Morgan ,Carnegie ,And Rockefeller BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for McKinley.---Who the fuck do ya think BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for Biden? Bezos ,Dorsey ,Zuckerberg ,and Soros. Why not bust THEM up? Because they OWN the Democrat Machine.
 

TheProgressivePatriot

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
17,982
Reaction score
3,424
Points
290
Location
The commie infested, queer loving liberal NE USA
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.
You explain too. See post #56.
so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?
Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot
You fucking articulate
Your Avatar name is an oxymoron. So called "Progressives" are all traitor Anarchists.
Oh please! Give a fucking break with that trite bovine excrement , Was Teddy Roosevelt a traitor and anarchist?
So? Ya want a parallel? With Teddy? Well ,he busted up "Trusts" because JP Morgan ,Carnegie ,And Rockefeller BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for McKinley.---Who the fuck do ya think BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for Biden? Bezos ,Dorsey ,Zuckerberg ,and Soros. Why not bust THEM up? Because they OWN the Democrat Machine.
Thank you admitting that progeressives are not traitors and anarchits . And it was the American who put Biden in the White House
 

San Souci

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,984
Points
1,940
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.
You explain too. See post #56.
so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?
Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot
You fucking articulate
Your Avatar name is an oxymoron. So called "Progressives" are all traitor Anarchists.
Oh please! Give a fucking break with that trite bovine excrement , Was Teddy Roosevelt a traitor and anarchist?
So? Ya want a parallel? With Teddy? Well ,he busted up "Trusts" because JP Morgan ,Carnegie ,And Rockefeller BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for McKinley.---Who the fuck do ya think BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for Biden? Bezos ,Dorsey ,Zuckerberg ,and Soros. Why not bust THEM up? Because they OWN the Democrat Machine.
Thank you admitting that progeressives are not traitors and anarchits . And it was the American who put Biden in the White House
No.It was Mail out votes. Bought and PAID for by Bezos. And I admit nothing. I deny everything. And BLM and Antifa are indeed TRAITORS. Democrat traitors. And "Progressives" are the WORST of Democrats.
 

Ringtone

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
3,040
Reaction score
914
Points
210
OK Slick. [sic] Two can play the same game of answering questions with another question

What right does ANY business ower [sic] - who offers good or services to the general public - to discrimiant [sic] by refusing service to ANYONE who walks through the door? If that business can in fact arbitrarily refuse service to any one [sic] for any reason, what are the implications for an orderly andcivil [sic] society?
You write like you think, Sport.

I didn't say anything about refusing service to ANYONE who walks through the door or about a business arbitrarily refusing service to anyone for any reason, did I?

Rather:

By what right does the government compel a homosexual (or any other-sexual) business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky?
Thanks.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top