New Congresswomen Lauren Bohbert Says New Bill Makes Gays and Transvestites Supreme to Everyone Else

[Indeependent]

equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

You explain too. See post #56.

so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?

Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot

You ******* articulate

Go **** yourself old man.What are your pronouns today?

TPP has proven time and again that he never looks at the entire flowchart of any given idea.

 

[Ringtone]

So don't bake the cake - And please stop whining incessantly. Oh - And fix your sig please. Highly annoying

Oh, so now you're pretending not understand the real-world outcomes. Hot damn, you're a phony ass!

 

[Indeependent]

So don't bake the cake - And please stop whining incessantly. Oh - And fix your sig please. Highly annoying

Oh, so now you're pretending not understand the real-world outcomes. Hot damn, you're a phony ass!

How else do ProgBots operate?

 

[San Souci]

equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

You explain too. See post #56.

so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?

Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot

You ******* articulate

You have not yet explained why a non-heterosexual is not considered an American in the face of current law.

Actually they are. That is the trouble.

 

[San Souci]

equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

You explain too. See post #56.

so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?

Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot

You ******* articulate

Your Avatar name is an oxymoron. So called "Progressives" are all traitor Anarchists.

 

[Ringtone]

is the gov'ment making you turn gay?

Are you on dope?

By what right does the government compel a homosexual business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky?

 

[playtime]

is the gov'ment making you turn gay?

Are you on dope?

By what right does the government compel a homosexual business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky?

^ ' Are you on dope: '

lol.... nope.

' By what right does the government compel a homosexual business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky? '

Fourteenth Amendment
Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 5
The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.



^^^ that ^^^

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Holy ******* shit you are a hopeless case. Just more of the same evasive bullshit! What the **** are you talking about? You are completely unable to actually explain what the negative consequenses of the equality act would look like IN THE REAL WORLD. Cut the ******* bullshit and answere the question. I am not overwhelmed. I am underwhelmed by your bullshit. Try some ******* honesty and clarity! I keep asking you to give specific examples of what you are taking about and I get is theoretical gobbidy gook that explains nothing. How is the law infringing on your right to free associate .Stop being a coward and answer the question.

Calm down, Sunshine.

By what right does the government compel a homosexual business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky?

Thanks.

OK Slick. Two can play the same game of answering questions with another question

What right does ANY business ower- who offers good or services to the general public - to discrimiant by refusing service to ANYONE who walks through the door? If that business can in fact arbitrarily refuse service to any one for any reason, what are the implications for an orderly andcivil society?
How do we function as a society if no one can be sure that they will not be humiliated when they enter a business? You mightalso want to consider the fact that the original civil rights act, as well as numerous state laws against discrimination were never sucsessfully challanged on constitutional grounds. Why do you think that is. ?

And, you never answered this. Do you or do you not support laws prohibiting discrimination against other minorities, or is it only laws protecting LBGT people that you have a problem with?

And you never responded to this either. Please explain EXACTLY how the Equality Act would infringe on parental rights with respect to consent and authority. Please be specic. Give examples of what you fear will happen. What parental rights are we talking about? What specific provision of the act are you referring to?

Give it a try hot shot

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

You explain too. See post #56.

so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?

Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot

You ******* articulate

Your Avatar name is an oxymoron. So called "Progressives" are all traitor Anarchists.

Oh please! Give a ******* break with that trite bovine excrement , Was Teddy Roosevelt a traitor and anarchist?

 

[DrLove]

Holy ******* shit you are a hopeless case. Just more of the same evasive bullshit! What the **** are you talking about? You are completely unable to actually explain what the negative consequenses of the equality act would look like IN THE REAL WORLD. Cut the ******* bullshit and answere the question. I am not overwhelmed. I am underwhelmed by your bullshit. Try some ******* honesty and clarity! I keep asking you to give specific examples of what you are taking about and I get is theoretical gobbidy gook that explains nothing. How is the law infringing on your right to free associate .Stop being a coward and answer the question.

Calm down, Sunshine.

By what right does the government compel a homosexual business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky?

Thanks.

OK Slick. Two can play the same game of answering questions with another question

What right does ANY business ower- who offers good or services to the general public - to discrimiant by refusing service to ANYONE who walks through the door? If that business can in fact arbitrarily refuse service to any one for any reason, what are the implications for an orderly andcivil society?
How do we function as a society if no one can be sure that they will not be humiliated when they enter a business? You mightalso want to consider the fact that the original civil rights act, as well as numerous state laws against discrimination were never sucsessfully challanged on constitutional grounds. Why do you think that is. ?

And, you never answered this. Do you or do you not support laws prohibiting discrimination against other minorities, or is it only laws protecting LBGT people that you have a problem with?

And you never responded to this either. Please explain EXACTLY how the Equality Act would infringe on parental rights with respect to consent and authority. Please be specic. Give examples of what you fear will happen. What parental rights are we talking about? What specific provision of the act are you referring to?

Give it a try hot shot

That one is certainly annoying

 

[Polishprince]

What right does ANY business ower- who offers good or services to the general public - to discrimiant by refusing service to ANYONE who walks through the door? If that business can in fact arbitrarily refuse service to any one for any reason, what are the implications for an orderly andcivil society?
How do we function as a society if no one can be sure that they will not be humiliated when they enter a business? You mightalso want to consider the fact that the original civil rights act, as well as numerous state laws against discrimination were never sucsessfully challanged on constitutional grounds. Why do you think that is. ?

It isn't "arbitrary" at all. People get refused service in a classy joint if they aren't wearing a jacket and tie, they get refused at a black cocktail lounge if they appear in their sheets. Why is it considered off the radar that a man in a dress should be told to get lost?

As far as the bakers in Oregon, they didn't refuse service at all. The homo customers asked for a product (Gay Marriage Cake) that they didn't carry.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

So you don't know what the actual outcomes would be. You're not cognizant of the outrageous violations of First-Amendment liberties and property rights this legislation portends, or cognizant of the judicial shitstorm that would arise if it were passed by the Senate and signed into law?

That's what I thought.

You hear the word equal and get a weepy, snot-stained hankey feeling. Hot damn, leftist politicians love useful idiots like you!

But, then, you in all likelihood are a rank narcissist or sociopath, so you wouldn't give a damn about the violation of others' natural rights anyway.

After all, you're a leftist, aren't you? You're a statist bootlick of collectivist, mobocratic rule, right?

I know what the outcome would be!

Liberty Counsel Falsely Claims Equality Act Would Force Religious Schools to Hire Pedophiles and 'Goat Lovers' | Right Wing Watch

Religious-right fearmongering about the Equality Act, which would add sexual orientation and gender identity protections to federal civil rights laws, has been increasingly extreme around Thursday’s vote in the House of Representatives, which passed the legislation on a 224-206 vote. Today, an email from Mat Staver of the stridently anti-LGBTQ Liberty Counsel declared that if the Equality Act became law, “schools [that] refuse to hire a crossdresser, a pedophile or a goat lover” would be “penalized.”

 

[Polishprince]

equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

So you don't know what the actual outcomes would be. You're not cognizant of the outrageous violations of First-Amendment liberties and property rights this legislation portends, or cognizant of the judicial shitstorm that would arise if it were passed by the Senate and signed into law?

That's what I thought.

You hear the word equal and get a weepy, snot-stained hankey feeling. Hot damn, leftist politicians love useful idiots like you!

But, then, you in all likelihood are a rank narcissist or sociopath, so you wouldn't give a damn about the violation of others' natural rights anyway.

After all, you're a leftist, aren't you? You're a statist bootlick of collectivist, mobocratic rule, right?

I know what the outcome would be!

Liberty Counsel Falsely Claims Equality Act Would Force Religious Schools to Hire Pedophiles and 'Goat Lovers' | Right Wing Watch

Religious-right fearmongering about the Equality Act, which would add sexual orientation and gender identity protections to federal civil rights laws, has been increasingly extreme around Thursday’s vote in the House of Representatives, which passed the legislation on a 224-206 vote. Today, an email from Mat Staver of the stridently anti-LGBTQ Liberty Counsel declared that if the Equality Act became law, “schools [that] refuse to hire a crossdresser, a pedophile or a goat lover” would be “penalized.”

How can you say its a "false claim"?

Paedophilia as well as goat ******* are perverted sexual preferences as well. It would be tough to deny those folks their "rights" if you give the rights to She Males and Cross Dressers.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

It isn't "arbitrary" at all. People get refused service in a classy joint if they aren't wearing a jacket and tie, they get refused at a black cocktail lounge if they appear in their sheets. Why is it considered off the radar that a man in a dress should be told to get lost?

False equivalency logical fallacy. A dress code applies equally to all. It is not a public accomodation issue

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

s far as the bakers in Oregon, they didn't refuse service at all. The homo customers asked for a product (Gay Marriage Cake) that they didn't carry.

Bullshit. What the hell is a gay marriage cake. A cke is a ******* cake

 

[San Souci]

equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

You explain too. See post #56.

so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?

Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot

You ******* articulate

Your Avatar name is an oxymoron. So called "Progressives" are all traitor Anarchists.

Oh please! Give a ******* break with that trite bovine excrement , Was Teddy Roosevelt a traitor and anarchist?

So? Ya want a parallel? With Teddy? Well ,he busted up "Trusts" because JP Morgan ,Carnegie ,And Rockefeller BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for McKinley.---Who the **** do ya think BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for Biden? Bezos ,Dorsey ,Zuckerberg ,and Soros. Why not bust THEM up? Because they OWN the Democrat Machine.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

You explain too. See post #56.

so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?

Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot

You ******* articulate

Your Avatar name is an oxymoron. So called "Progressives" are all traitor Anarchists.

Oh please! Give a ******* break with that trite bovine excrement , Was Teddy Roosevelt a traitor and anarchist?

So? Ya want a parallel? With Teddy? Well ,he busted up "Trusts" because JP Morgan ,Carnegie ,And Rockefeller BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for McKinley.---Who the **** do ya think BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for Biden? Bezos ,Dorsey ,Zuckerberg ,and Soros. Why not bust THEM up? Because they OWN the Democrat Machine.

Thank you admitting that progeressives are not traitors and anarchits . And it was the American who put Biden in the White House

 

[San Souci]

equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

You explain too. See post #56.

so how did women getting the right to vote - affect *you*? being 'allowed' to get birth control without their husband's consent - affect *you* ? the right to own property - affect *you*?

how did blacks, no longer having a separate bathroom & water fountain - affect *you*?

how about donny's 'traditional' marriage AFTER marriage AFTER marriage... knocking up wife #2 b4 being divorced from wife #1 - affect *you* or your right to practice *your* religion? how about rush limbaugh's FOUR 'traditional' marriages?

are you connecting the dots yet?

Yes. Liberals suck. Dot Dot Dot

You ******* articulate

Your Avatar name is an oxymoron. So called "Progressives" are all traitor Anarchists.

Oh please! Give a ******* break with that trite bovine excrement , Was Teddy Roosevelt a traitor and anarchist?

So? Ya want a parallel? With Teddy? Well ,he busted up "Trusts" because JP Morgan ,Carnegie ,And Rockefeller BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for McKinley.---Who the **** do ya think BOUGHT the WhiteHouse for Biden? Bezos ,Dorsey ,Zuckerberg ,and Soros. Why not bust THEM up? Because they OWN the Democrat Machine.

Thank you admitting that progeressives are not traitors and anarchits . And it was the American who put Biden in the White House

No.It was Mail out votes. Bought and PAID for by Bezos. And I admit nothing. I deny everything. And BLM and Antifa are indeed TRAITORS. Democrat traitors. And "Progressives" are the WORST of Democrats.

 

[Ringtone]

OK Slick. [sic] Two can play the same game of answering questions with another question

What right does ANY business ower [sic] - who offers good or services to the general public - to discrimiant [sic] by refusing service to ANYONE who walks through the door? If that business can in fact arbitrarily refuse service to any one [sic] for any reason, what are the implications for an orderly andcivil [sic] society?

You write like you think, Sport.

I didn't say anything about refusing service to ANYONE who walks through the door or about a business arbitrarily refusing service to anyone for any reason, did I?

Rather:

By what right does the government compel a homosexual (or any other-sexual) business owner, for example, to provide goods or services that entail making expressions or directly participating in activities that the same regards as evil or icky?​

​

Thanks.

 

[Hollie]

This lady was elected. rightwinger try not to have your ears bleed out.

You’re intimidated.

Your ego won’t survive.