New: CBP Shoots and Kills Man in MN

Exercising your right to be armed does not mean you have the right to commit federal felonies and not suffer the consequences.

Really amazing that people generally understand that you cannot yell fire in a crowded theater causing a mass panic and stampede out of the place just because you have a 1st Amendment, yet they still refuse to understand that their 2nd amendment allowing them to carry for self defense does not include taking that gun into certain places where it can be construed as a danger to others, because the gun IS the danger.

Which is why the first thing a cop asks you when stopped in your car is whether you have a gun on you. You can shoot a gun in half a second killing an officer, an unreasonable and unnecessary risk to police which swamps your 2A rights as in the presence of police, just what need have you for self-defense?

Afraid some armed thug is going to mug you while surrounded by armed cops???

Geesh.
 
Lesh goes out of her way to prove she is the dumbest of the dumb shits and cannot go a day without lying.
If she had any self respect, she'd stop embarrassing herself.

Currently, I see an inordinate number of people demanding "they 25th Amendment him".
Tell me you don;t know anything about the 25th amendment.
Oh look tranny boy is babbling again. Anyone know which sex he/she identifies as?

Trump is obviously not well either physically or mentally.

Those are the criteria for removal under the 25th
 
Well there was one who had his finger bitten offi, by one of your fellow dembots Two women charged after allegedly biting federal agents in Minnesota

Then there was one hospitalized with internal hemorrhaging after being hit by Green with a car, sadly that wasn’t the first time he was hit by a car, he was dragged by one earlier in 2025
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/ice-agent-minneapolis-shooting-car-dragged-invs


Here’s another case where ramming cars was done Driver charged with assault after allegedly ramming ICE vehicles in December stop

Another case where a dembot attacked an officer with a shovel when he was arresting an illegal


And on and on…I guess you don’t get a lot of news on the plantation
So when an incident like this where an ICE officer is hit by a vehicle, there is a hospital report?

Oddly not so on the Ross/Good case.

Has anyone seen that hospital report

No?

He wasn’t hit?

Oh
 
Last edited:
So when an online this where an ICE officer is hit by a vehicle there is a hospital report?

Oddly not so on the Ross/Good case.

Has anyone seen that hospital report

No?

He wasn’t hit?

Oh
Why would someone's medical records be posted online? Why would it be public?

There is something called HIPPA, it's a pretty big, and well known federal law in the United States. The fact you are unaware of it, either shows just how ignorant you are, or that you are some sort of Russian bot.
 
You are allowed to yell at them.

None of this is obstructing.

Yes, it is.

Part of an agents job is to communicate with the person being detained. If you're yelling, and they can't read them their rights, ask them if they have papers showing they're legal, etc, then you are OBSTRUCTING.

"Yes, making an excessive amount of noise that intentionally prevents a police officer from hearing or performing their duties can be considered obstruction of a peace officer (or obstruction of justice)."

Key Legal Aspects
  • Active Interference: If noise (like shouting, playing loud music, or using a device) is intended to prevent an officer from communicating with someone, listening to surroundings, or conducting a traffic stop, it can be prosecuted as a misdemeanor.
  • "Willful" Obstruction: The obstruction must be deliberate. It is not just about being loud, but about using noise to hinder the officer.
  • Context Matters: While screaming at police is often protected, using high-volume sound to prevent an officer from hearing a suspect or responding to a scene is a functional obstacle.

You continue to show your absolute ignorance when it comes to this stuff.

And on that point, it is ILLEGAL to carry a gun while committing a crime. And since obstruction is a crime, THAT IS A CRIME IN ITSELF. Carrying a gun is for LAW ABIDING CITIZENS ONLY.

"It is always illegal to carry a concealed weapon while committing a crime, and doing so often results in separate, additional felony charges and significantly enhanced penalties."
 
Last edited:
Why would someone's medical records be posted online? Why would it be public?

There is something called HIPPA, it's a pretty big, and well known federal law in the United States. The fact you are unaware of it, either shows just how ignorant you are, or that you are some sort of Russian bot.
My post for autocorrected. It changed “incident” to online

BUT as noted, in previous incidents where an ICE officer was hit a hospital report was released
 
There's a very simple lesson here.

Don't harass the feds!

If you're going to film, fine. Anything north of that is harassment.
It was still an illegal use of deadly force and that hurts the deportation effort
 
My post for autocorrected. It changed “incident” to online

BUT as noted, in previous incidents where an ICE officer was hit a hospital report was released
Link us to the medical records of a ICE agent please....
 
My post for autocorrected. It changed “incident” to online

BUT as noted, in previous incidents where an ICE officer was hit a hospital report was released

HIPPA would prevent this. You're lying.
 
My post for autocorrected. It changed “incident” to online

BUT as noted, in previous incidents where an ICE officer was hit a hospital report was released

HIPPA would prevent this. You're lying.

Lesh

Specifics matter. HIPPA in general would have prevented the release, however the individual can authorize release. So if the agent authorized it, then DHS could release it to the public.

However in the case of Officer Ross medical records would be covered under HIPPA. One would think that releasing information for that specific incident if it was major internal trauma, would be something he would do. If it was minor (maybe "internal bleeding" was a black and blue bruise on his hand) then that is something he wouldn't want released.

Another exception to HIPPA is a court order, so if Good's family files a wrongful death suit, they can get a subpeona approved by the Judge in the case to have medical records for that specific event released to the claimant for their case. (NOTE: The claimant could NOT release it to the public, but they can use it in open court later.)

WW
 
Lesh

Specifics matter. HIPPA in general would have prevented the release, however the individual can authorize release. So if the agent authorized it, then DHS could release it to the public.

However in the case of Officer Ross medical records would be covered under HIPPA. One would think that releasing information for that specific incident if it was major internal trauma, would be something he would do. If it was minor (maybe "internal bleeding" was a black and blue bruise on his hand) then that is something he wouldn't want released.

Another exception to HIPPA is a court order, so if Good's family files a wrongful death suit, they can get a subpeona approved by the Judge in the case to have medical records for that specific event released to the claimant for their case. (NOTE: The claimant could NOT release it to the public, but they can use it in open court later.)

WW
HIPPA Can be waved
 
15th post
That’s absolutely absurd. The “operation” was the arrest of an illegal alien which was occurring nowhere near the location that the agent was shoving women to the ground.
In fact, the best I can tell, by the time he starts attacking women, the suspect is already in the vehicle.
You can’t redefine “operation” to include some magical halo around an officer.
That's right.
 
That rule is only valid when there is a specific enforcement, not when agents are wandering around.
THe ICE agbet was too violent with her but she should have been detained cuffed and put in a car. Instead they escalated the situation
 
They wanted to make sure he was dead.
Cops are trained to fire multiple shots in controlled pairs or 3 shots. (mm rounds dont stop an attack fats i=enough in single shots. In any case shooting was not legal use of deadly force in this case.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom