Just yell "debunked!" Even if it hasn't been.
But facts are stubborn things.
This.
Or this
[Cyber Ninjas AZ Audit Report, Vol. III Details]
Below: Voters on whom no identity match could be found, page 56 Cyber Ninjas report (click for larger image)
Or this.
From table in Cyber Ninjas report
Or this...
or this...
I'm sure this has been debunked a thousand times, but let's have a go.
1) A tweet from George Christensen.
What's his twitter account? When did he send this stuff? Who knows. Your image is pointless. I can't check it out.
2) Maricopa County Forensic Election Audit
The reports says that most of these people simply "are in fact real people with a limited public record and commercial presence"
This doesn't suggest these people don't exist. Merely that there are two programs which are quite disturbing really, which track people's information, their births, their deaths, when they move home etc etc. And this system couldn't find such people on there. I mean, it's not surprising that people might try and hide themselves in the US.
This does not seem to suggest much for electoral fraud. It's a suggestion that maybe they should look into this a little more. Be a little more thorough.
3) You could have put the number so people could find it easily.
The chart you posted is DIFFERENT from chart 5.2 on page 5.
Votes that potentially voted in Multiple counties is 5,295 and not 10,342 as you've posted.
They give reasons for why Mail-in Ballots Voted from prior address. Literally the person who lives there now simply forwarded this mail on.
10,342 have the same first, middle and last name and were born in the same year. Somehow this figure gets to 5,047, not sure how, potentially the same name three times? Who knows. They don't seem to know.
What's more likely is someone moved from one county to another and are registered in two places. Doesn't mean they voted twice. There's no suggestion they did.
4) Not sure which part of this you think is relevant.
5) Not sure which part of this you think is relevant.
To sum up, your ability to present what you think are facts, to write about why you think these are an issue, is poor at best. Difficult to follow, only one of the five things you posted is even really worth anything. The third thing comes from where? Seems to be from the same document as 2 but is different from what I found.
Unless you provide stuff that can be used in a debate, no wonder no one has "debunked" this yet. There's nothing to debunk.
