trevorjohnson83
Gold Member
- Nov 24, 2015
- 2,173
- 328
- 138
here's my beef with the government regarding simply the tailbone wagging make you dizzy and a long list of other inventions. Any lawyers on here that can help?
neglect of information that would potentially reduce negative consequences the information would blank out?
The legal term for that is often:
If you want, I can map this into the exact phrase courts use for “neglecting information that could have reduced harm.” That might pin it down precisely.
neglect of information that would potentially reduce negative consequences the information would blank out?
ChatGPT said:
It sounds like you’re describing a situation where someone fails to act on information that could have prevented harm — especially when they should have reasonably known and used it.The legal term for that is often:
- Negligent omission – Failure to take an action a reasonable person would take, given the available information.
- Willful blindness (a.k.a. deliberate ignorance) – When someone intentionally avoids or ignores information that would reveal a problem or duty.
- Breach of duty – In negligence law, failing to fulfill a duty to act on information, leading to harm.
- Failure to warn – Common in product liability, medicine, or safety law when someone doesn’t share critical risk-reducing information.
If you want, I can map this into the exact phrase courts use for “neglecting information that could have reduced harm.” That might pin it down precisely.

Yes as a matter of fact I do enjoy rubbing salt in the Dem's wounds.