colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
You are arguing a lost case that you can not change. However you are admitting that the mmr vaccine causes autism which is what the jury also concluded, so congrats for agreeing with me professor
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
You are arguing a lost case that you can not change. However you are admitting that the mmr vaccine causes autism which is what the jury also concluded, so congrats for agreeing with me professor
The fact that you never directly respond to the questions in my post demonstrate you are failing.
How many cases of autism are traced back to the same enzymatic deficiency that Hanna Poling has?
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
You are arguing a lost case that you can not change. However you are admitting that the mmr vaccine causes autism which is what the jury also concluded, so congrats for agreeing with me professor
The fact that you never directly respond to the questions in my post demonstrate you are failing.
How many cases of autism are traced back to the same enzymatic deficiency that Hanna Poling has?
Since the rate of autism is 1.69% of the general population and far less of the general population have the deficiency that you are babbling about, clearly the math proves that this deficiency is not the cause of autism.
Clearly you failed quantum physics
Yawn
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
You are arguing a lost case that you can not change. However you are admitting that the mmr vaccine causes autism which is what the jury also concluded, so congrats for agreeing with me professor
The fact that you never directly respond to the questions in my post demonstrate you are failing.
How many cases of autism are traced back to the same enzymatic deficiency that Hanna Poling has?
Since the rate of autism is 1.69% of the general population and far less of the general population have the deficiency that you are babbling about, clearly the math proves that this deficiency is not the cause of autism.
Clearly you failed quantum physics
Yawn
So that's what I've been trying to tell you. You even half admitted it too, that you're not going to find THE cause of autism, but that lots of disorders present with similar symptoms and since autism is a clinical disorder, many underlying pathologies can be labeled as autism.
So Hanna Poling has a serious underlying metabolic defect which caused her to have encephalopathy which gave her symptoms that looks like autism. Maybe it had something to do with the vaccine, maybe it didn't. But what is clear is that Hanna Poling's case has nothing to do with the vast majority cases of autism.
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
You are arguing a lost case that you can not change. However you are admitting that the mmr vaccine causes autism which is what the jury also concluded, so congrats for agreeing with me professor
The fact that you never directly respond to the questions in my post demonstrate you are failing.
How many cases of autism are traced back to the same enzymatic deficiency that Hanna Poling has?
Since the rate of autism is 1.69% of the general population and far less of the general population have the deficiency that you are babbling about, clearly the math proves that this deficiency is not the cause of autism.
Clearly you failed quantum physics
Yawn
So that's what I've been trying to tell you. You even half admitted it too, that you're not going to find THE cause of autism, but that lots of disorders present with similar symptoms and since autism is a clinical disorder, many underlying pathologies can be labeled as autism.
So Hanna Poling has a serious underlying metabolic defect which caused her to have encephalopathy which gave her symptoms that looks like autism. Maybe it had something to do with the vaccine, maybe it didn't. But what is clear is that Hanna Poling's case has nothing to do with the vast majority cases of autism.
Encephalopathy is related to autism since the same part of the brain is effected. The vaccine effects every part of the body and should not be given to newborns who do not have an immune system yet. You are babbling about 1 child and ignoring the biblical plague of 6 million more.
And the jury already agreed with me so you can stop punching yourself in the head now
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
You are arguing a lost case that you can not change. However you are admitting that the mmr vaccine causes autism which is what the jury also concluded, so congrats for agreeing with me professor
The fact that you never directly respond to the questions in my post demonstrate you are failing.
How many cases of autism are traced back to the same enzymatic deficiency that Hanna Poling has?
Since the rate of autism is 1.69% of the general population and far less of the general population have the deficiency that you are babbling about, clearly the math proves that this deficiency is not the cause of autism.
Clearly you failed quantum physics
Yawn
So that's what I've been trying to tell you. You even half admitted it too, that you're not going to find THE cause of autism, but that lots of disorders present with similar symptoms and since autism is a clinical disorder, many underlying pathologies can be labeled as autism.
So Hanna Poling has a serious underlying metabolic defect which caused her to have encephalopathy which gave her symptoms that looks like autism. Maybe it had something to do with the vaccine, maybe it didn't. But what is clear is that Hanna Poling's case has nothing to do with the vast majority cases of autism.
Encephalopathy is related to autism since the same part of the brain is effected. The vaccine effects every part of the body and should not be given to newborns who do not have an immune system yet. You are babbling about 1 child and ignoring the biblical plague of 6 million more.
And the jury already agreed with me so you can stop punching yourself in the head now
No it's not. Encephalopathy (more accurately toxic metabolic encephalopathy) is not a diagnostic criteria of autism. Hanna's syndrome was caused by a metabolic defect which resulted in damage to her brain without which she wouldn't have had symptoms consistent with autism.
You may want to consider listening to me for once. I know a lot more than you do about these things.
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
You are arguing a lost case that you can not change. However you are admitting that the mmr vaccine causes autism which is what the jury also concluded, so congrats for agreeing with me professor
The fact that you never directly respond to the questions in my post demonstrate you are failing.
How many cases of autism are traced back to the same enzymatic deficiency that Hanna Poling has?
Since the rate of autism is 1.69% of the general population and far less of the general population have the deficiency that you are babbling about, clearly the math proves that this deficiency is not the cause of autism.
Clearly you failed quantum physics
Yawn
So that's what I've been trying to tell you. You even half admitted it too, that you're not going to find THE cause of autism, but that lots of disorders present with similar symptoms and since autism is a clinical disorder, many underlying pathologies can be labeled as autism.
So Hanna Poling has a serious underlying metabolic defect which caused her to have encephalopathy which gave her symptoms that looks like autism. Maybe it had something to do with the vaccine, maybe it didn't. But what is clear is that Hanna Poling's case has nothing to do with the vast majority cases of autism.
Encephalopathy is related to autism since the same part of the brain is effected. The vaccine effects every part of the body and should not be given to newborns who do not have an immune system yet. You are babbling about 1 child and ignoring the biblical plague of 6 million more.
And the jury already agreed with me so you can stop punching yourself in the head now
No it's not. Encephalopathy (more accurately toxic metabolic encephalopathy) is not a diagnostic criteria of autism. Hanna's syndrome was caused by a metabolic defect which resulted in damage to her brain without which she wouldn't have had symptoms consistent with autism.
You may want to consider listening to me for once. I know a lot more than you do about these things.
No matter the jury agrees with me, feel free to stay in your delusion
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
You are arguing a lost case that you can not change. However you are admitting that the mmr vaccine causes autism which is what the jury also concluded, so congrats for agreeing with me professor
The fact that you never directly respond to the questions in my post demonstrate you are failing.
How many cases of autism are traced back to the same enzymatic deficiency that Hanna Poling has?
Since the rate of autism is 1.69% of the general population and far less of the general population have the deficiency that you are babbling about, clearly the math proves that this deficiency is not the cause of autism.
Clearly you failed quantum physics
Yawn
So that's what I've been trying to tell you. You even half admitted it too, that you're not going to find THE cause of autism, but that lots of disorders present with similar symptoms and since autism is a clinical disorder, many underlying pathologies can be labeled as autism.
So Hanna Poling has a serious underlying metabolic defect which caused her to have encephalopathy which gave her symptoms that looks like autism. Maybe it had something to do with the vaccine, maybe it didn't. But what is clear is that Hanna Poling's case has nothing to do with the vast majority cases of autism.
Encephalopathy is related to autism since the same part of the brain is effected. The vaccine effects every part of the body and should not be given to newborns who do not have an immune system yet. You are babbling about 1 child and ignoring the biblical plague of 6 million more.
And the jury already agreed with me so you can stop punching yourself in the head now
No it's not. Encephalopathy (more accurately toxic metabolic encephalopathy) is not a diagnostic criteria of autism. Hanna's syndrome was caused by a metabolic defect which resulted in damage to her brain without which she wouldn't have had symptoms consistent with autism.
You may want to consider listening to me for once. I know a lot more than you do about these things.
No matter the jury agrees with me, feel free to stay in your delusion
Actually no, they agree with me.
Vaccine Injury Case Offers a Clue to the Causes of Autism
Could a group of disorders involving the "power plants of the cell" explain why some vaccinated children develop autism but the vast majority don't?www.scientificamerican.com
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
You are arguing a lost case that you can not change. However you are admitting that the mmr vaccine causes autism which is what the jury also concluded, so congrats for agreeing with me professor
The fact that you never directly respond to the questions in my post demonstrate you are failing.
How many cases of autism are traced back to the same enzymatic deficiency that Hanna Poling has?
Since the rate of autism is 1.69% of the general population and far less of the general population have the deficiency that you are babbling about, clearly the math proves that this deficiency is not the cause of autism.
Clearly you failed quantum physics
Yawn
So that's what I've been trying to tell you. You even half admitted it too, that you're not going to find THE cause of autism, but that lots of disorders present with similar symptoms and since autism is a clinical disorder, many underlying pathologies can be labeled as autism.
So Hanna Poling has a serious underlying metabolic defect which caused her to have encephalopathy which gave her symptoms that looks like autism. Maybe it had something to do with the vaccine, maybe it didn't. But what is clear is that Hanna Poling's case has nothing to do with the vast majority cases of autism.
Encephalopathy is related to autism since the same part of the brain is effected. The vaccine effects every part of the body and should not be given to newborns who do not have an immune system yet. You are babbling about 1 child and ignoring the biblical plague of 6 million more.
And the jury already agreed with me so you can stop punching yourself in the head now
No it's not. Encephalopathy (more accurately toxic metabolic encephalopathy) is not a diagnostic criteria of autism. Hanna's syndrome was caused by a metabolic defect which resulted in damage to her brain without which she wouldn't have had symptoms consistent with autism.
You may want to consider listening to me for once. I know a lot more than you do about these things.
No matter the jury agrees with me, feel free to stay in your delusion
Actually no, they agree with me.
Vaccine Injury Case Offers a Clue to the Causes of Autism
Could a group of disorders involving the "power plants of the cell" explain why some vaccinated children develop autism but the vast majority don't?www.scientificamerican.com
Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
Family of Hannah Poling will Receive More than $1.5 Million in Just the First Year for her Life Care, Lost Earnings, and Pain and Suffering.www.cbsnews.com
Then you agree that the vaccines caused the childs injuries. As do I and did the jury
Are you getting frustrated yet doc?
You might as well hand over the keys to the safe now
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
You are arguing a lost case that you can not change. However you are admitting that the mmr vaccine causes autism which is what the jury also concluded, so congrats for agreeing with me professor
The fact that you never directly respond to the questions in my post demonstrate you are failing.
How many cases of autism are traced back to the same enzymatic deficiency that Hanna Poling has?
Since the rate of autism is 1.69% of the general population and far less of the general population have the deficiency that you are babbling about, clearly the math proves that this deficiency is not the cause of autism.
Clearly you failed quantum physics
Yawn
So that's what I've been trying to tell you. You even half admitted it too, that you're not going to find THE cause of autism, but that lots of disorders present with similar symptoms and since autism is a clinical disorder, many underlying pathologies can be labeled as autism.
So Hanna Poling has a serious underlying metabolic defect which caused her to have encephalopathy which gave her symptoms that looks like autism. Maybe it had something to do with the vaccine, maybe it didn't. But what is clear is that Hanna Poling's case has nothing to do with the vast majority cases of autism.
Encephalopathy is related to autism since the same part of the brain is effected. The vaccine effects every part of the body and should not be given to newborns who do not have an immune system yet. You are babbling about 1 child and ignoring the biblical plague of 6 million more.
And the jury already agreed with me so you can stop punching yourself in the head now
No it's not. Encephalopathy (more accurately toxic metabolic encephalopathy) is not a diagnostic criteria of autism. Hanna's syndrome was caused by a metabolic defect which resulted in damage to her brain without which she wouldn't have had symptoms consistent with autism.
You may want to consider listening to me for once. I know a lot more than you do about these things.
No matter the jury agrees with me, feel free to stay in your delusion
Actually no, they agree with me.
Vaccine Injury Case Offers a Clue to the Causes of Autism
Could a group of disorders involving the "power plants of the cell" explain why some vaccinated children develop autism but the vast majority don't?www.scientificamerican.com
Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
Family of Hannah Poling will Receive More than $1.5 Million in Just the First Year for her Life Care, Lost Earnings, and Pain and Suffering.www.cbsnews.com
Then you agree that the vaccines caused the childs injuries. As do I and did the jury
Are you getting frustrated yet doc?
You might as well hand over the keys to the safe now
It’s plausible, that’s all, in this one very specific case. Applying her case to other children with autism is absurd.
How many children with vaccine caused brain damage are acceptable to you and the other simpletons who wasted Daddys cash at Harvard?Lol 4 billion in vaccine related court determined vaccine damages is certainly not rare.
How many people have received damages?
Considering vaccines have saved an astonishing number of lives, the number would need to be rather high to outweigh the benefit.
So how many people have received damages?
Lets see 1 out of every 59 children has autism or 1.69 %. 331000000 × 1.69 % = 5,593,000 children with autism.
This is a plague of biblical proportions
Feel free to check the math you imbecile
So did all those kids have a rare enzymatic deficiency like Hanna Poling too?
The jury concluded that Pollings diseases were caused by the vaccine. Your delusions forbid you to accept and comprehend that this is past tense.
Which would have never happened had she not had a rare enzymatic deficiency.
So how many cases of autism are traced back to that deficiency?
You are arguing a lost case that you can not change. However you are admitting that the mmr vaccine causes autism which is what the jury also concluded, so congrats for agreeing with me professor
The fact that you never directly respond to the questions in my post demonstrate you are failing.
How many cases of autism are traced back to the same enzymatic deficiency that Hanna Poling has?
Since the rate of autism is 1.69% of the general population and far less of the general population have the deficiency that you are babbling about, clearly the math proves that this deficiency is not the cause of autism.
Clearly you failed quantum physics
Yawn
So that's what I've been trying to tell you. You even half admitted it too, that you're not going to find THE cause of autism, but that lots of disorders present with similar symptoms and since autism is a clinical disorder, many underlying pathologies can be labeled as autism.
So Hanna Poling has a serious underlying metabolic defect which caused her to have encephalopathy which gave her symptoms that looks like autism. Maybe it had something to do with the vaccine, maybe it didn't. But what is clear is that Hanna Poling's case has nothing to do with the vast majority cases of autism.
Encephalopathy is related to autism since the same part of the brain is effected. The vaccine effects every part of the body and should not be given to newborns who do not have an immune system yet. You are babbling about 1 child and ignoring the biblical plague of 6 million more.
And the jury already agreed with me so you can stop punching yourself in the head now
No it's not. Encephalopathy (more accurately toxic metabolic encephalopathy) is not a diagnostic criteria of autism. Hanna's syndrome was caused by a metabolic defect which resulted in damage to her brain without which she wouldn't have had symptoms consistent with autism.
You may want to consider listening to me for once. I know a lot more than you do about these things.
No matter the jury agrees with me, feel free to stay in your delusion
Actually no, they agree with me.
Vaccine Injury Case Offers a Clue to the Causes of Autism
Could a group of disorders involving the "power plants of the cell" explain why some vaccinated children develop autism but the vast majority don't?www.scientificamerican.com
Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
Family of Hannah Poling will Receive More than $1.5 Million in Just the First Year for her Life Care, Lost Earnings, and Pain and Suffering.www.cbsnews.com
Then you agree that the vaccines caused the childs injuries. As do I and did the jury
Are you getting frustrated yet doc?
You might as well hand over the keys to the safe now
It’s plausible, that’s all, in this one very specific case. Applying her case to other children with autism is absurd.
Glad that you have accepted your inevitable defeat by the undefeated Q Anonymous
Don't forget the safe keys doc