NBC's Steve Kornacki Throws Cold Water on Kamala Harris' Chances

And subject to the jurisdiction thereof is the key phrase. Citizens of other countries are subject to international law and the jurisdiction of their home country.

.

Holy shit, you are actually crazy enough to think that courts don’t know whats in constitution.

Nope, only a constitutional expert like you knows how to read.
 
Illegals???? If Biden let them in, and documented their refugee claims, then they're not "illegals". They're "refugee claimants" who are legally in the country.

That is actually the antithesis of "open borders". Also, Biden has turned away and deported for more people than he's let in.



Furthermore, both the Wall Street Journal and Forbes have said that immigration is driving your rapid economic recovery.




Canada let in 1.5 million immigrants last year. That's equal to 15 million in the USA. Our economy is thriving for it, just like yours.


Also, Biden has turned away and deported for more people than he's let in.

Liar.

Furthermore, both the Wall Street Journal and Forbes have said that immigration is driving your rapid economic recovery.

Yeah, we need more unskilled illegal aliens who don't speak English and collect welfare.
 
Holy shit, you are actually crazy enough to think that courts don’t know whats in constitution.

Nope, only a constitutional expert like you knows how to read.


Yeah, it's another invention to come out of the 14th. That phrase was intended to make former slaves born in the US citizens, nothing more. The Constitution is not a suicide pact. It was never intended to facilitate pregnancy tourism.


.
 
Yeah, it's another invention to come out of the 14th. That phrase was intended to make former slaves born in the US citizens, nothing more.

If it was only meant for slaves then thats what it would say. You can't just make shit up you WISH was true....and then laughably try to accuse someone else of inventing something.
 
Last edited:
If it was only meant for slaves then thats what it would say. You can't just make shit up you WISH was true....and then laughably try to accuse someone else of inventing something.


There have been many SCOTUS decisions citing the 14th that were wrong. Hopefully the current court will revisit them. Roe and Casey should be just a start.

.
 
There have been many SCOTUS decisions citing the 14th that were wrong. Hopefully the current court will revisit them. Roe and Casey should be just a start.

.
Dream on.
 
Trump leads her in all the swing states by an average of 9-10 points. And that's before Cackles has to debate. She's proven she can't do that. Half the party doesn't even want her as the nominee.
Trump thinks "swing states" are what he was involved in when he was hanging around with Epstein, knuckle dragger.
 
Illegals???? If Biden let them in, and documented their refugee claims, then they're not "illegals". They're "refugee claimants" who are legally in the country.

That is actually the antithesis of "open borders". Also, Biden has turned away and deported for more people than he's let in.



Furthermore, both the Wall Street Journal and Forbes have said that immigration is driving your rapid economic recovery.




Canada let in 1.5 million immigrants last year. That's equal to 15 million in the USA. Our economy is thriving for it, just like yours.
Bullshit! Joe Biden opened the borders and let in 13 MILLION illegals! We're feeling the effects of that now. Crime is spiking across the country, local budgets are being depleted and our hospitals are overwhelmed with non paying patients. That's ALL on the Democrats!
 
You saw the Roe ruling coming right meathead.
Well, I have to say, I didn't think they had the gull to lie to Congress in their confirmations that Roe is settled precedent....only to turn right around and simply discard it at first opportunity.

But Roe's flaws were AT LEAST SERIOUSLY DISCUSSED in the legal circles. Birthright citizenship is not, Constitution's language is fairly clear.
 
Well, I have to say, I didn't think they had the gull to lie to Congress in their confirmations that Roe is settled precedent....only to turn right around and simply discard it at first opportunity.

But Roe's flaws were AT LEAST SERIOUSLY DISCUSSED in the legal circles. Birthright citizenship is not, Constitution's language is fairly clear.


You don't know what settled precedent means.

And that's okay.
 
Well, I have to say, I didn't think they had the gull to lie to Congress in their confirmations that Roe is settled precedent....only to turn right around and simply discard it at first opportunity.

But Roe's flaws were AT LEAST SERIOUSLY DISCUSSED in the legal circles. Birthright citizenship is not, Constitution's language is fairly clear.

Original intent.
 
Original intent.
What about it? Intent was to make people born in USA citizens, except those under not under US jurisdiction - diplomats, Indians, etc.
 
Last edited:
Well, I have to say, I didn't think they had the gull to lie to Congress in their confirmations that Roe is settled precedent....only to turn right around and simply discard it at first opportunity.

But Roe's flaws were AT LEAST SERIOUSLY DISCUSSED in the legal circles. Birthright citizenship is not, Constitution's language is fairly clear.

I didn't think they had the gull to lie to Congress in their confirmations that Roe is settled precedent....

Settled precedent? What does that mean?

Birthright citizenship is not, Constitution's language is fairly clear.

Indeed.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
 
Back
Top Bottom