NBC removes documentation that atmospheric temperature data showing no warming in 2005 was fudged

[EMH]

Just how many entities are in on the Co2 FRAUD?

Certainly nobody with a brain thought the "media" was not involved. Heck, they not only cannot answer questions posted here over and over by EMH, but now they have resorted to censoring their own report in 2005, which documented that the two and only two measures of atmospheric temps were FUDGED in 2005 with laughable excuses...

This article is now "forbidden" by the "Ministry of Truth"

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

Fortunately, this article has been cited here over and over...

Search results for query: https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna8917093

www.usmessageboard.com

which explains why NBC is now censoring it....


BASIC SCIENCE LESSON:

Your THEORY is that increasing atmospheric Co2 warms the atmosphere.

You have two and only two sources of atmospheric temp data, satellites and balloons. Both show NO WARMING for DECADES despite rising Co2.

THEORY REJECTED

but that's not what happened. The data was FUDGED in 2005, and now NBC doesn't want you to know THAT TRUTH.... WHY?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It doesn’t matter. We’ve all been dead from global warming for fifteen years already.

 

[EMH]

It doesn’t matter. We’ve all been dead from global warming for fifteen years already.

Co2 FRAUD is now worse than 911 and Covid Fraud/Murderous Fraud Vax summed together.

 

[justoffal]

It doesn’t matter. We’ve all been dead from global warming for fifteen years already.

It sucks being dead. If only I had listened to the warmists and emptied my entire bank account into their hands....I might still be around to post about it. But shit! I'm dead so I can't!

 

[Dagosa]

Just how many entities are in on the Co2 FRAUD?

Certainly nobody with a brain thought the "media" was not involved. Heck, they not only cannot answer questions posted here over and over by EMH, but now they have resorted to censoring their own report in 2005, which documented that the two and only two measures of atmospheric temps were FUDGED in 2005 with laughable excuses...

This article is now "forbidden" by the "Ministry of Truth"

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

Fortunately, this article has been cited here over and over...

Search results for query: https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna8917093

www.usmessageboard.com

which explains why NBC is now censoring it....


BASIC SCIENCE LESSON:

Your THEORY is that increasing atmospheric Co2 warms the atmosphere.

You have two and only two sources of atmospheric temp data, satellites and balloons. Both show NO WARMING for DECADES despite rising Co2.

THEORY REJECTED

but that's not what happened. The data was FUDGED in 2005, and now NBC doesn't want you to know THAT TRUTH.... WHY?

Still making believe people can’t actually read your bull shit posts….amazing. No, the data wasn’t fudged dumbo, the data was misinterpreted by deniers. .”Key claim against global warming evaporates….”
You still can’t read.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Just how many entities are in on the Co2 FRAUD?

Certainly nobody with a brain thought the "media" was not involved. Heck, they not only cannot answer questions posted here over and over by EMH, but now they have resorted to censoring their own report in 2005, which documented that the two and only two measures of atmospheric temps were FUDGED in 2005 with laughable excuses...

This article is now "forbidden" by the "Ministry of Truth"

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

Fortunately, this article has been cited here over and over...

Search results for query: https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna8917093

www.usmessageboard.com

which explains why NBC is now censoring it....


BASIC SCIENCE LESSON:

Your THEORY is that increasing atmospheric Co2 warms the atmosphere.

You have two and only two sources of atmospheric temp data, satellites and balloons. Both show NO WARMING for DECADES despite rising Co2.

THEORY REJECTED

but that's not what happened. The data was FUDGED in 2005, and now NBC doesn't want you to know THAT TRUTH.... WHY?

$3 Trillion reasons why it was redacted

 

[EMH]

Still making believe people can’t actually read your bull shit posts….amazing. No, the data wasn’t fudged dumbo, the data was misinterpreted by deniers. .”Key claim against global warming evaporates….”
You still can’t read.

DATA = from instruments = NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE

FUDGE = politicized manipulation of DATA for dishonorable causes = the 2005 FUDGE JOB of the atmospheric temp data

 

[EMH]

$3 Trillion reasons why it was redacted

Four days later, NBC put it back up...

LOL!!!

THE DOCTOR has a following!!!

 

[Dagosa]

DATA = from instruments = NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE

FUDGE = politicized manipulation of DATA for dishonorable causes = the 2005 FUDGE JOB of the atmospheric temp data

What a science illiterate. The atmosphere doesn’t appreciably warm measurably. It’s the surface temps science illiterate…..it ‘ s the earth and water warming that demonstrates AGW, foolish, not the atmosphere, ha ha….IR doesn’t heat up the atmosphere, it heats up the surface of the earth….what a Trumper….did you get out of Jr High ?

 

[Weatherman2020]

$3 Trillion reasons why it was redacted

Yep. And for $3T we won’t even tell you what if any impact that spending will have on the climate

 

[Dagosa]

Yep. And for $3T we won’t even tell you what if any impact that spending will have on the climate

We know the effect. Trump will loose the election. So, now that a majority of republicans running for office now agree with AGW, who are Trumpers going to vote for ?

 

[Dagosa]

Yep. And for $3T we won’t even tell you what if any impact that spending will have on the climate

Yes we do….bubba.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

We know the effect. Trump will loose the election. So, now that a majority of republicans running for office now agree with AGW, who are Trumpers going to vote for ?

Really? How much must we reduce CO2 to prevent the climate from changing?

 

[Dagosa]

Really? How much must we reduce CO2 to prevent the climate from changing?

Enough to expose your ignorance.

 

[Dante]

Still making believe people can’t actually read your bull shit posts….amazing. No, the data wasn’t fudged dumbo, the data was misinterpreted by deniers. .”Key claim against global warming evaporates….”
You still can’t read.

But, but, but...

 

[Dagosa]

But, but, but...

Butthead….

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Enough to expose your ignorance.

You don't have a number, do you

 

[Dagosa]

You don't have a number, do you

Yes I do. The answer is, the climate always changes….but we can alter the rate of change, non science person.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yes I do. The answer is, the climate always changes….but we can alter the rate of change, non science person.

So if we reduce the "extra" CO2 by half, will temperatures drop by 50%?

 

[Dagosa]

So if we reduce the "extra" CO2 by half, will temperatures drop by 50%?

You’re confused aren’t you ? The rate of increase will be reduced dumbo. Your ears must be covering your eyes. You just made up shit.