Nature Mag Admits Global Warming Scam is Communism

[edthecynic]

There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold.

You moron... "THEY SOLD" which means THEY OWNED and from their excess they provided for the rest.. BUT THEY DETERMINED WHAT WAS EXCESS not the state or the church.

YOU have no clue what being a good steward of what GOD gave us means.

Twisting the Bible for you're own purpose...

Acts 4:32 Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common.
4:34 There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold.
4:35 They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.

(New Revised Standard version)

That is exactly whatYOU did!!!
And the parts you edited out expose your lie. You simply changed EVERYTHING to "excess" to create your lie. There is great punishment from God for doing that.

Revelation 22:18,19

18. For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

Let me put this dunce in his place...


But there is one move "proof" that the Leftists use to promote communism/socialism....and is fairly powerful- if one is unfamiliar with biblical history.

Acts 2:44-45
44 All the believers were together and had everything in common. 45 They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.

Hmmm.....kinda like "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs "





Now for the context: the quote refers to a festival celebrated by the Jews/Christians of the time, the time after the grain harvest.

"The preceding verses in Acts show that the time setting is the annual festival of Pentecost. On this day, thousands of Jews from all over the world were gathered in Jerusalem. ... In their excitement of finding God’s truth, conversing with God’s apostles and people of like mind, many remained in Jerusalem longer than they had planned and ran short of food and money. .... “Consequently, of necessity, they formed a sort of community for the time being only.

These people were not socialists or Communists. But they were generous, giving and compassionate! Many of the local Church members sold their property as needed to help fellow brothers meet their expenses in Jerusalem during this exciting time ..."


“They did not all sell everything they owned at once, but they sold property only when,or ‘as anyone might be in need.’ … an absolute community of goods never was practiced by the Church at Jerusalem or any other Christian church” Is God a Socialist?



Never a commune.....never a permanent socialist entity.

The bible is clear as to who gets help....and when.

Your lies contradict verse 44.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold.

You moron... "THEY SOLD" which means THEY OWNED and from their excess they provided for the rest.. BUT THEY DETERMINED WHAT WAS EXCESS not the state or the church.

YOU have no clue what being a good steward of what GOD gave us means.

Twisting the Bible for you're own purpose...

Acts 4:32 Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common.
4:34 There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold.
4:35 They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.

(New Revised Standard version)

That is exactly whatYOU did!!!
And the parts you edited out expose your lie. You simply changed EVERYTHING to "excess" to create your lie. There is great punishment from God for doing that.

Revelation 22:18,19

18. For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

Let me put this dunce in his place...


But there is one move "proof" that the Leftists use to promote communism/socialism....and is fairly powerful- if one is unfamiliar with biblical history.

Acts 2:44-45
44 All the believers were together and had everything in common. 45 They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.

Hmmm.....kinda like "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs "





Now for the context: the quote refers to a festival celebrated by the Jews/Christians of the time, the time after the grain harvest.

"The preceding verses in Acts show that the time setting is the annual festival of Pentecost. On this day, thousands of Jews from all over the world were gathered in Jerusalem. ... In their excitement of finding God’s truth, conversing with God’s apostles and people of like mind, many remained in Jerusalem longer than they had planned and ran short of food and money. .... “Consequently, of necessity, they formed a sort of community for the time being only.

These people were not socialists or Communists. But they were generous, giving and compassionate! Many of the local Church members sold their property as needed to help fellow brothers meet their expenses in Jerusalem during this exciting time ..."


“They did not all sell everything they owned at once, but they sold property only when,or ‘as anyone might be in need.’ … an absolute community of goods never was practiced by the Church at Jerusalem or any other Christian church” Is God a Socialist?



Never a commune.....never a permanent socialist entity.

The bible is clear as to who gets help....and when.

Your lies contradict verse 44.

You know I never lie....

...I just smashed another custard pie in your kisser.


Wear it well.

 

[edthecynic]

I never lie....

That itself is a lie.

 

[flacaltenn]

Political chic has something you will never have:

Common sense

That quote courtesy of a guy who had 4 months of pay checks stashed in his top desk drawer.. AND could never find his keys..

 

[Wyatt earp]

Political chic has something you will never have:

Common sense

That quote courtesy of a guy who

had 4 months of pay checks stashed in his top desk drawer.. AND could never find his keys..

And never knew his own phone number..


Damn his biography was huge , over 1000 pages long to read.

 

[Old Rocks]

The OP is one of the most scientfically illiterate posters on this board. So the 'commies' are all running around with torches melting the ice in the Arctic, and the alpine glaciers? Why aren't you doing something about that? LOL All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities in the world state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. And you and your Nazi ideology think that you are so much smarter than virtually all the scientists in the world. LOL You, and the rest of the yokels, are a laugh. A bunch of ignorant rednecks sitting around demanding proof that the world is an oblate spheroid. LOL

Well let's say science is right. The Paris Agreement Trump backed out of, according to scientists, would have done next to nothing about the problem. It would be akin to putting a Band-Aid on a cancer, so why join it?

Now getting back to what really needs to be done according to scientists. What needs to be done is a world wide consensus on global warming. You can't have a country like the US or China ignoring It, everyone has to be on board or the whole thing does not work. How will this be achieved minus a world government of some kind?

Additionally, what needs to be done, according to scientists, will have far reaching effects on the world economy that is based upon fossil fuels. In short, scientists are suggesting that we gut the world economy to save the planet, all under a one unified world government. How will you get the votes?

Naturally, they will feed us the bit about democracy, but in developed countries the votes will not be there. No sane voter will vote to gut their wallet to give it to Joe Shmoe in Haiti, so what will have to be done is either deceive them or force it down their throats. Then when they set up their one little world government, most of the world voters will be dirt poor, so at that point you can maintain the welfare vote world wide via democracy as demagogues promise crumbs to be continually thrown their way to help avoid starvation.

Dumb ass, China is installing more renewables than any other nation on earth. And they are beginning the process of shutting down their dirty coal plants. India is starting down that same path. And the very poor nations are actually using renewables from the gitgo, rather than fossil fuels. Solar and wind do not require an infrastructure of road, rail, and pipelines, just a grid, which can be any scale, and can be scaled upward.

 

[Old Rocks]

Political chic has something you will never have:

Common sense

That quote courtesy of a guy who had 4 months of pay checks stashed in his top desk drawer.. AND could never find his keys..

And completely change the way that we looked at the world.

 

[Old Rocks]

The OP is one of the most scientfically illiterate posters on this board. So the 'commies' are all running around with torches melting the ice in the Arctic, and the alpine glaciers? Why aren't you doing something about that? LOL All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities in the world state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. And you and your Nazi ideology think that you are so much smarter than virtually all the scientists in the world. LOL You, and the rest of the yokels, are a laugh. A bunch of ignorant rednecks sitting around demanding proof that the world is an oblate spheroid. LOL

Well let's say science is right. The Paris Agreement Trump backed out of, according to scientists, would have done next to nothing about the problem. It would be akin to putting a Band-Aid on a cancer, so why join it?

Now getting back to what really needs to be done according to scientists. What needs to be done is a world wide consensus on global warming. You can't have a country like the US or China ignoring It, everyone has to be on board or the whole thing does not work. How will this be achieved minus a world government of some kind?

Additionally, what needs to be done, according to scientists, will have far reaching effects on the world economy that is based upon fossil fuels. In short, scientists are suggesting that we gut the world economy to save the planet, all under a one unified world government. How will you get the votes?

Naturally, they will feed us the bit about democracy, but in developed countries the votes will not be there. No sane voter will vote to gut their wallet to give it to Joe Shmoe in Haiti, so what will have to be done is either deceive them or force it down their throats. Then when they set up their one little world government, most of the world voters will be dirt poor, so at that point you can maintain the welfare vote world wide via democracy as demagogues promise crumbs to be continually thrown their way to help avoid starvation.

Then when they set up their one little world government

How is that possible...With America and her guns?

Well now, when we have a President swinging on Putin's dick, how do you think it is not possilble? Never thought it would be the conservatives that would sell us out to the communists in Russia.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The OP is one of the most scientfically illiterate posters on this board. So the 'commies' are all running around with torches melting the ice in the Arctic, and the alpine glaciers? Why aren't you doing something about that? LOL All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities in the world state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. And you and your Nazi ideology think that you are so much smarter than virtually all the scientists in the world. LOL You, and the rest of the yokels, are a laugh. A bunch of ignorant rednecks sitting around demanding proof that the world is an oblate spheroid. LOL

Well let's say science is right. The Paris Agreement Trump backed out of, according to scientists, would have done next to nothing about the problem. It would be akin to putting a Band-Aid on a cancer, so why join it?

Now getting back to what really needs to be done according to scientists. What needs to be done is a world wide consensus on global warming. You can't have a country like the US or China ignoring It, everyone has to be on board or the whole thing does not work. How will this be achieved minus a world government of some kind?

Additionally, what needs to be done, according to scientists, will have far reaching effects on the world economy that is based upon fossil fuels. In short, scientists are suggesting that we gut the world economy to save the planet, all under a one unified world government. How will you get the votes?

Naturally, they will feed us the bit about democracy, but in developed countries the votes will not be there. No sane voter will vote to gut their wallet to give it to Joe Shmoe in Haiti, so what will have to be done is either deceive them or force it down their throats. Then when they set up their one little world government, most of the world voters will be dirt poor, so at that point you can maintain the welfare vote world wide via democracy as demagogues promise crumbs to be continually thrown their way to help avoid starvation.

Dumb ass, China is installing more renewables than any other nation on earth. And they are beginning the process of shutting down their dirty coal plants. India is starting down that same path. And the very poor nations are actually using renewables from the gitgo, rather than fossil fuels. Solar and wind do not require an infrastructure of road, rail, and pipelines, just a grid, which can be any scale, and can be scaled upward.

"China is installing more renewables than any other nation on earth."

I'll help ya' pack.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The OP is one of the most scientfically illiterate posters on this board. So the 'commies' are all running around with torches melting the ice in the Arctic, and the alpine glaciers? Why aren't you doing something about that? LOL All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities in the world state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. And you and your Nazi ideology think that you are so much smarter than virtually all the scientists in the world. LOL You, and the rest of the yokels, are a laugh. A bunch of ignorant rednecks sitting around demanding proof that the world is an oblate spheroid. LOL

Well let's say science is right. The Paris Agreement Trump backed out of, according to scientists, would have done next to nothing about the problem. It would be akin to putting a Band-Aid on a cancer, so why join it?

Now getting back to what really needs to be done according to scientists. What needs to be done is a world wide consensus on global warming. You can't have a country like the US or China ignoring It, everyone has to be on board or the whole thing does not work. How will this be achieved minus a world government of some kind?

Additionally, what needs to be done, according to scientists, will have far reaching effects on the world economy that is based upon fossil fuels. In short, scientists are suggesting that we gut the world economy to save the planet, all under a one unified world government. How will you get the votes?

Naturally, they will feed us the bit about democracy, but in developed countries the votes will not be there. No sane voter will vote to gut their wallet to give it to Joe Shmoe in Haiti, so what will have to be done is either deceive them or force it down their throats. Then when they set up their one little world government, most of the world voters will be dirt poor, so at that point you can maintain the welfare vote world wide via democracy as demagogues promise crumbs to be continually thrown their way to help avoid starvation.

Then when they set up their one little world government

How is that possible...With America and her guns?

Well now, when we have a President swinging on Putin's dick, how do you think it is not possilble? Never thought it would be the conservatives that would sell us out to the communists in Russia.

Bulletin: the only folks proven to have ties to Putin are Democrats.

That's a fact.

 

[flacaltenn]

The OP is one of the most scientfically illiterate posters on this board. So the 'commies' are all running around with torches melting the ice in the Arctic, and the alpine glaciers? Why aren't you doing something about that? LOL All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities in the world state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. And you and your Nazi ideology think that you are so much smarter than virtually all the scientists in the world. LOL You, and the rest of the yokels, are a laugh. A bunch of ignorant rednecks sitting around demanding proof that the world is an oblate spheroid. LOL

Well let's say science is right. The Paris Agreement Trump backed out of, according to scientists, would have done next to nothing about the problem. It would be akin to putting a Band-Aid on a cancer, so why join it?

Now getting back to what really needs to be done according to scientists. What needs to be done is a world wide consensus on global warming. You can't have a country like the US or China ignoring It, everyone has to be on board or the whole thing does not work. How will this be achieved minus a world government of some kind?

Additionally, what needs to be done, according to scientists, will have far reaching effects on the world economy that is based upon fossil fuels. In short, scientists are suggesting that we gut the world economy to save the planet, all under a one unified world government. How will you get the votes?

Naturally, they will feed us the bit about democracy, but in developed countries the votes will not be there. No sane voter will vote to gut their wallet to give it to Joe Shmoe in Haiti, so what will have to be done is either deceive them or force it down their throats. Then when they set up their one little world government, most of the world voters will be dirt poor, so at that point you can maintain the welfare vote world wide via democracy as demagogues promise crumbs to be continually thrown their way to help avoid starvation.

Dumb ass, China is installing more renewables than any other nation on earth. And they are beginning the process of shutting down their dirty coal plants. India is starting down that same path. And the very poor nations are actually using renewables from the gitgo, rather than fossil fuels. Solar and wind do not require an infrastructure of road, rail, and pipelines, just a grid, which can be any scale, and can be scaled upward.

China is SITTING on most of their installed renewables because they can't BALANCE the demand/load with the numbers they already have. And up until a couple years ago --- they were opening a couple NEW coal plants every week.. They're NOT scrapping them. Trying to get BACKBONE generation INCREASES..

You can't INCREASE generation numbers with JUST wind and solar..

 

[skookerasbil]

The OP is one of the most scientfically illiterate posters on this board. So the 'commies' are all running around with torches melting the ice in the Arctic, and the alpine glaciers? Why aren't you doing something about that? LOL All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities in the world state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. And you and your Nazi ideology think that you are so much smarter than virtually all the scientists in the world. LOL You, and the rest of the yokels, are a laugh. A bunch of ignorant rednecks sitting around demanding proof that the world is an oblate spheroid. LOL

Well let's say science is right. The Paris Agreement Trump backed out of, according to scientists, would have done next to nothing about the problem. It would be akin to putting a Band-Aid on a cancer, so why join it?

Now getting back to what really needs to be done according to scientists. What needs to be done is a world wide consensus on global warming. You can't have a country like the US or China ignoring It, everyone has to be on board or the whole thing does not work. How will this be achieved minus a world government of some kind?

Additionally, what needs to be done, according to scientists, will have far reaching effects on the world economy that is based upon fossil fuels. In short, scientists are suggesting that we gut the world economy to save the planet, all under a one unified world government. How will you get the votes?

Naturally, they will feed us the bit about democracy, but in developed countries the votes will not be there. No sane voter will vote to gut their wallet to give it to Joe Shmoe in Haiti, so what will have to be done is either deceive them or force it down their throats. Then when they set up their one little world government, most of the world voters will be dirt poor, so at that point you can maintain the welfare vote world wide via democracy as demagogues promise crumbs to be continually thrown their way to help avoid starvation.

Dumb ass, China is installing more renewables than any other nation on earth. And they are beginning the process of shutting down their dirty coal plants. India is starting down that same path. And the very poor nations are actually using renewables from the gitgo, rather than fossil fuels. Solar and wind do not require an infrastructure of road, rail, and pipelines, just a grid, which can be any scale, and can be scaled upward.

China is SITTING on most of their installed renewables because they can't BALANCE the demand/load with the numbers they already have. And up until a couple years ago --- they were opening a couple NEW coal plants every week.. They're NOT scrapping them. Trying to get BACKBONE generation INCREASES..

You can't INCREASE generation numbers with JUST wind and solar..

Yep..........the AGW climate crusaders gather their energy info on fake news sites so it is understandable. They never find out about epiC levels of coal production going on in China ( and India ). These people who proclaim China being on the cusp of going all-in on renewables........just complete suckers OR sock-puppet assholes. Either way.........they are well, losing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

11. How long has the Right been telling the simpletons that the Global Warming scam is really just one more iteration of communism???
Well…dang, turns out we’re just as correct as when we told you that Bill Clinton was a rapist, and Hussein Obama was a total failure.
And now we have the words right of Nature Magazine!!!!


Although the dunces that I regularly infuriate with the truth, are incapable of learning, lots of folks have caught on to the Left’s ‘environmentalism.’

It’s been re-named the ‘Watermelon Movement.’



“Why ‘Environmentalists’ Are Called ‘Watermelons’

Because they’re green on the outside and red on the inside, of course.
This is not just a clever joke; it’s true with regard to the professional “environmentalists,” if not most of the rank and file. All of their frauds and ruses, from acid rain to cellphone cancer scares, to global cooling, global warming, the “ozone hole,” “climate change,” etc., have one common denominator: They are used to make a case for a massive redistribution of worldwide wealth and central planning of the entire world’s economy. Communism, in other words.

…. his arguments always came down to this: All of our environmental problems will disappear if only we would adopt socialism.

Anyway, Murray once asked him the following at an informal lunch (paraphrasing from memory): “You environmentalists are opposed to nuclear power, hydroelectric power, coal-fired power plants, natural gas, and all other forms of energy. But energy is the lifeblood of capitalism. Without energy our capitalist economy will be destroyed.”

According to Murray Weidenbaum, who was the Chairman of President Reagan’s Council of Economic advisers in 1981, Commoner just smiled and nodded approvingly.”
Why 'Environmentalists' Are Called 'Watermelons' - LRC Blog LewRockwell.com




Communism, environmentalism, Liberalism.......Cretinous Primitivism

 

[edthecynic]

 

[Crick]

How long has the Right been telling the simpletons that the Global Warming scam is really just one more iteration of communism???

Well…dang, turns out we’re just as correct as when we told you that Bill Clinton was a rapist, and Hussein Obama was a total failure.




1.”STUDY in Nature: Global wealth redistribution, economic ‘degrowth’ needed to fight ‘global warming’

2. New study claims economic systems must be restructured to fit 'within planetary boundaries.'

3. Paper urges "moving beyond the pursuit of GDP growth to embrace new measures of progress. It could also involve the pursuit of ‘degrowth’ in wealthy nations and the shift towards alternative economic models such as a steady-state economy."

4. "We apply a top-down approach that distributes shares of each planetary boundary among nations based on current population “
STUDY in Nature: Global wealth redistribution, economic ‘degrowth’ needed to fight ‘global warming’



You warmists must feel like total dopes, huh?



5. “…we will have to substantially redistribute the wealth of the West to the poor, so that the entire globe can live in a substantially lower (for us) but relatively equal standard of living.


6….forget creating a world with freedom of opportunity, but tilt at Utopian windmills to force equal outcomes: To each according to his needs, from each according to his ability.” Environmentalists Push Global Wealth Redistribution





Here's the music that goes with that view:

Did it ever occur to you to obtain, perhaps, a sixth grade level of understanding regarding politics before opening your idiotic yap? I guess not.

 

[PoliticalChic]

How long has the Right been telling the simpletons that the Global Warming scam is really just one more iteration of communism???

Well…dang, turns out we’re just as correct as when we told you that Bill Clinton was a rapist, and Hussein Obama was a total failure.




1.”STUDY in Nature: Global wealth redistribution, economic ‘degrowth’ needed to fight ‘global warming’

2. New study claims economic systems must be restructured to fit 'within planetary boundaries.'

3. Paper urges "moving beyond the pursuit of GDP growth to embrace new measures of progress. It could also involve the pursuit of ‘degrowth’ in wealthy nations and the shift towards alternative economic models such as a steady-state economy."

4. "We apply a top-down approach that distributes shares of each planetary boundary among nations based on current population “
STUDY in Nature: Global wealth redistribution, economic ‘degrowth’ needed to fight ‘global warming’



You warmists must feel like total dopes, huh?



5. “…we will have to substantially redistribute the wealth of the West to the poor, so that the entire globe can live in a substantially lower (for us) but relatively equal standard of living.


6….forget creating a world with freedom of opportunity, but tilt at Utopian windmills to force equal outcomes: To each according to his needs, from each according to his ability.” Environmentalists Push Global Wealth Redistribution





Here's the music that goes with that view:

Did it ever occur to you to obtain, perhaps, a sixth grade level of understanding regarding politics before opening your idiotic yap? I guess not.

Rather than admit that everything in the post to which you linked is 100% correct, you chose the typical Liberals "I hat you" post.


Can't begin to tell you upset it made me......(yawn)

 

[SSDD]

Yes, #3, and the anus-barer in #2 finally flashes the correct response. OP hasn't the cahones to compare the similarities twixt capitalism and communism.

Compare???

Sure, you fool....

Those slaughtered by those, like you....who demand the bending of the neck and the knee to government.

Stalin....42,672,000

Mao.....37,828,000

Hitler....20,946,000

Lenin....4,017,000

Pol Pot...2,397,000

Tojo.....3,990,000

Total......111,850,000 men, women and children.

#14 Liberal Demagoguery, Hate and Violence – A Compendium




112 human beings.


...versus this:

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.



Gads, you're an imbecile....but you must get tired of everyone telling you that, huh?

How many have been massacreed in the purge for capital credits?

How many?