Maybe you can explain what hateful propaganda is and who decides it is hateful propaganda. Better yet Mr. Wisdom, explain how hateful propaganda is not covered and included as being part of our constitutional right to free speech.
BTW, conservative radio and most Teabagger spokespeople are considered by many to be purveyors of hateful propaganda. Should we prevent them from speaking?
Sure, I can explain it. American citizens demanding honest government is not propaganda. Defending corrupt politicians and deflecting for them and attacking Americans who play by the rules is propaganda.
You are using the actual propaganda as it is defined to explain your rhetorical definition of what propaganda is. Your answer is propaganda. You are leaving it to yourself to determine what is factual and what is not. What is untruthful and what is not. You are allowing yourself to be the judge of truth or lies without review, insisting that you are the qualified judge of such matters and interpretations. Hence the truth becomes what you say it is. That is a definition of propaganda.
It is all irrelevant because Ted Nugent has a right to say whatever he wants and people have a right to say whatever they want about what Ted said. Doesn't matter if some people think Ted or his critics are using propaganda. Propaganda is just a dishonest way of marketing a thought, idea, concept, etc. If we were talking about a product we would call it false advertisement.
BTW, people have been demanding honest government forever. It has been a political topic ever since governments were created. Romans and Greeks discussed the need for honest government. Your ideas are not original, new or interesting.