Nationalized elections are a fantasy. The Senate math is absolute.

Conservative from Georgia

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2018
Messages
4,014
Reaction score
3,445
Points
1,938
Trump needs Congress to do this, and the Senate needs 60 votes. Republicans only have 53.

Think they’ll nuke the filibuster? Wrong. Thune, Collins, and others are hard NOs.

Without the votes, the SAVE Act is dead.

 
Trump needs Congress to do this, and the Senate needs 60 votes. Republicans only have 53.

Think they’ll nuke the filibuster? Wrong. Thune, Collins, and others are hard NOs.

Without the votes, the SAVE Act is dead.
We're literally in a situation in which we have to concern ourselves with the notion that one party, led my a sociopathic megalomaniac, is considering trying to literally take over our elections.

History is screaming at us, Europe is screaming at us, and the enablers and useful idiots just cheer it on.

Incredible. It's still stunning that we've arrived here.
 
Trump needs Congress to do this, and the Senate needs 60 votes. Republicans only have 53.

Think they’ll nuke the filibuster? Wrong. Thune, Collins, and others are hard NOs.

Without the votes, the SAVE Act is dead.

<~~~~~~~~~~<​
Whats' the problem we already have national elections for president?
 
<~~~~~~~~~~<​
Whats' the problem we already have national elections for president?
We do not actually have a national election.

What we have are 51 separate elections (50 states + D.C.) that just happen to take place on the same day.

There is no "Federal Board of Elections"

States count the votes.
 
We're literally in a situation in which we have to concern ourselves with the notion that one party, led my a sociopathic megalomaniac, is considering trying to literally take over our elections.

History is screaming at us, Europe is screaming at us, and the enablers and useful idiots just cheer it on.

Incredible. It's still stunning that we've arrived here.
How does verifying you have the right to vote taking over our elections? Preventing illegals from voting is a lofty goal.
 
We're literally in a situation in which we have to concern ourselves with the notion that one party, led my a sociopathic megalomaniac, is considering trying to literally take over our elections.

History is screaming at us, Europe is screaming at us, and the enablers and useful idiots just cheer it on.

Incredible. It's still stunning that we've arrived here.
You cheat. This reduces trust. You are 99% of the excessive craziness that goes on top of the normal for us all.
 
The Democrat party has become a malignancy on our election system. Democrats no longer think they need to obey laws they don't agree with. They no longer believe in the supremacy law. They no longer believe in the first or second amendments. They no longer believe in the office of the President and they no longer believe in the vision of our founders, as evidenced by their deliberate move toward communism. Just look at their last two Presidential candidates if you don't believe me.
 
How does verifying you have the right to vote taking over our elections? Preventing illegals from voting is a lofty goal.
The thing is that you’re lying about illegals having voted before.
The Democrat party has become a malignancy on our election system. Democrats no longer think they need to obey laws they don't agree with. They no longer believe in the supremacy law. They no longer believe in the first or second amendments. They no longer believe in the office of the President and they no longer believe in the vision of our founders, as evidenced by their deliberate move toward communism. Just look at their last two Presidential candidates if you don't believe me.
Your rant had nothing to do with elections
 
The thing is that you’re lying about illegals having voted before.
You're wrong. In Blue states when they get Drivers license there is auto enrollment for voting. Yes there is a box you must check saying you legally are allowed to vote. They lie, nobody verifies that those who check that box are actually citizens.
 
If POTUS elections are nationalized, imagine how easy it will be for you lefties to cheat when you win the White House again.

The next election would be 538-0 for the Dem candidate.
 
Trump needs Congress to do this, and the Senate needs 60 votes. Republicans only have 53.

Think they’ll nuke the filibuster? Wrong. Thune, Collins, and others are hard NOs.

Without the votes, the SAVE Act is dead.


I don’t believe the SAVE act has anything to do with Trump’s ideas of nationalizing the election elections. It’s simply about making sure that voter ID is instituted.

Over 80% of Americans support voter ID. If Republican senators vote this down, it could very well be political trouble for them.
 
<~~~~~~~~~~<​
Whats' the problem we already have national elections for president?
Actually, we do not. We have 51 elections in the states and DC that award electoral votes. The federal government has no place in elections. That is the unfortunate truth. Try reading your Constitution please.
 
Back
Top Bottom