Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
On which post? Quote it.I explained at the bottom why your argument was fallacious. Go ahead and address it if you can.
Dems get around that by appointing lib judges who just make up crap as they along
So an employee now is a slave? Just quit your job
wow
Take society back to cave men. How did one survive?Homeless and starving is not a valid option.
Besides I didn't say that employees were slaves...learn to read dimbo!!!
Instead of making people guess what the fuck your point is, just say it.Homeless and starving is not a valid option.
Besides I didn't say that employees were slaves...learn to read dimbo!!!
Take society back to cave men. How did one survive?
Learn to think.
Instead of making people guess what the fuck your point is, just say it.
There is only one dimbo, and that is you dick-h
You mean, you'll actually work for your own survival?Sure, I'll run around clubbing animals for food and dragging women by the hair to my box under the bridge.
That sounds more like a willful vow of poverty than enslavement.O.K., since your unable to understand my point from context:
Since most Americans are heavily in debt, they are effectively slaves.
This is stated only for your education. Since you failed to understand the original statement, you are far too dumb for me to waste my time debating you.
So, you are saying you're a slave. I was right, and you could quit your job.O.K., since your unable to understand my point from context:
Since most Americans are heavily in debt, they are effectively slaves.
This is stated only for your education. Since you failed to understand the original statement, you are far too dumb for me to waste my time debating you.
The arguments for them might of been in the federalist papers but they weren't actually ratified until two years after the Constitution was.
The bill of rights was adopted WITH the ratification of the constitution, you ignorant half-wit. They were SPECIFCALLY addressed in the Federalist Papers BEFORE ratification.
No, it was mostly about slavery. The state right the South was first and foremost concerned with was protecting their right to slavery. When Northern states used their rights to protect runaway slaves the Southern states vehemently disagreed.The biggest issue threatening the adoption of the new constitution was GIVING UP STATE RIGHTS, which was tangentially related to slavery, but get over your black self. It wasn't about you.
They weren't concerned about all tyranny, just the tyranny that affected them. They codified their tyranny of others into law.Correct. The problem is that nobody really gave too much of a shit about slavery at the time. They were more concerned about tyranny, which they had recently thrown off with a costly war.
Quote them and let's see.
that is LITERALLY how you framed it, dip shit. Look at your own words:
You stated it EXACTLY that way.
www.forbes.com
My point is that if they are it isn't because of the slavers but because slavers and slavery was over thrown. Argue against that.On which post? Quote it.
West Africans are better off in America today. Argue against that point.
In order to make it harder for a federal government to abolish slavery. Refute that.The constitution was specifically designed to united the independent states for defense and common currency, and was intended to be VERY limited in scope, preserving all other rights NOT enumerated to the States or People. Refute that.
Genius take Richard.So we're forever stuck in 1784?
...by white people....My point is that if they are it isn't because of the slavers but because slavers and slavery was over thrown. Argue against that.
Already did 10x over. I'll refer you to the Federalist Papers, of which you have never heard, likely.In order to make it harder for a federal government to abolish slavery. Refute that.
And black people. Note though, those white people were fighting against slavers as well. The argument that black people should be grateful to slavers is a ridiculous one....by white people....
...slavers who were also black people...And black people. Note though, those white people were fighting against slavers as well. The argument that black people should be grateful to slavers is a ridiculous one.
No that's not a fact. Without the benefits of slavery America may not have survived. Without slavery who knows what would of become of the people who inhabited West Africa. Any predictions about what America or West Africa would be sans slavery is mere sophistry....slavers who were also black people...
But, it is ridiculous to expect decedents of slaves to be grateful for slavery. I agree on that point.
It is also A FACT that, but for slavery, West Africans would have largely stayed in West Africa. 13% of the U.S. population would not be black folks.
The North was WAY more powerful than the South. You're saying that without slavery, the North would not have become the powerhouse it had become leading up to the war?Without the benefits of slavery America may not have survived.
And therefore, to undo what has already been done without anything resembling an acceptable alternative is ludicrous.Without slavery who knows what would of become of the people who inhabited West Africa. Any predictions about what America or West Africa would be sans slavery is mere sophistry.
No, I'm saying without the benefit of slave labor America's economy might not have survived let alone become the powerhouse it became. All of America's most prosperous industries relied on slave labor and the products produced by that slave labor. I'm also saying arguing that black people would be worse off today without slavery because they wouldn't of come to America is trying to argue you know how things would of played out without slavery, and you don't and to suggest you do is an irrational argument.The North was WAY more powerful than the South. You're saying that without slavery, the North would not have become the powerhouse it had become leading up to the war?
I'm not a magician. I'm not suggesting we reverse time and circumstance. I'm saying, very clearly, that the notion black Americans owe slavers gratitude is stupid.And therefore, to undo what has already been done without anything resembling an acceptable alternative is ludicrous.
I don't know what you think this has to do with any of my arguments. I don't give a shit about things you'd like rammed through and really didn't ask.Again, look at the Bill of Federalism. Tell me you want that easily rammed through. I sure do. That would be GREAT.
