Nancy Pelosi claimed Joe Biden should be on Mount Rushmore. When is that happening?

She said it.

When is it happening?

Nancy Pelosi would never lie for politics.
 
iu


Which Joe should be used? This one or the senile hair plugs guy?

Lefties, tell us which one you want on Mount Rushmore.
 
IMO, most folks would say Andrew Jackson, Ike, and JFK are far more deserving.

. .. I mean, who better to further desecrate the holy land of the Lakota, than the nation's number one president responsible for native American genocide?
 
Start a campaign to get Biden on Mount Rushmore.

Why would you make Pelosi a liar.

Raise money and get it done because you lefties always tell the truth.
 
I want this guy.

Just proving the lefties lie.

photo.jpg


Lefties, why are you not supporting Pelosi?

Is it because you lie?
 
Wasn't...Jackson a evil dude ?

I am a good REPUB and I'd like to see JFK up there.
There is no such thing as a "evil," person or a "good," person.

All people do right, and do wrong.

. . .and, "right," and "wrong," is a matter of perspective as well.

Take this link, some of the things in it that link that are from the author's perspective a "con," I think are a "pro."


Today, would a pro-choice president be good or evil? Well, that entirely depends on a person's own moral compass, doesn't it?




For those who believe the Indian wars were a good thing, he is a hero, for those who believe the Indian wars were genocide, he was evil.

Likewise, for those who oppose a banking cartel, he was good, for those who think the federal reserve is a good thing, they would be disposed to believe he is a moron.

But none can claim he wasn't the first populist president elected to represent the regular folks, instead of the political elites.

. . . I know one person who thinks this democrat was a hero and one of our greatest presidents. . .

iu

9vv5qh.jpg

 
There is no such thing as a "evil," person or a "good," person.

All people do right, and do wrong.

. . .and, "right," and "wrong," is a matter of perspective as well.

I read a article once about Jackson had Indians killed that didn't have to be.

They say Hitler was a nice guy once you got to know him and he loved German Shepherds to.
 
I read a article once about Jackson had Indians killed that didn't have to be.
uhhh. . . not explicitly no.

But the Trail of Tears was managed in a most horrible way, because most Americans at that time did not think the natives were much more than animals.

By present day definitions in international law, Jackson's actions, like those of Netanyahu, are considered "ethnic cleansing," by standard definitions.

1748799740228.webp



Both want to get rid of a hostile population to their people by removing them to somewhere else.
 
Lefties,

You are not liars. Biden belongs on Rushmore.

Get it done.

Are you calling Nancy Pelosi a liar?
 
By present day definitions in international law, Jackson's actions, like those of Netanyahu, are considered "ethnic cleansing," by standard definitions.

There it is folks...MisterBeale goes to the Israel card.

We have waiting for it all night and we all knew...sooner or later it would come out.

What a deflection listeners !

I hate hearing LIBs say America stole the Indians land but Jackson action was a clear cut case.

BTW: I wasn't talking about The trail of tears. (maybe it had something to do with that indirectly)
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom