ConHog
Rookie
- Jun 4, 2010
- 14,538
- 952
- 0
- Banned
- #201
If you grow your own you won't have to pay tax on it. Not to mention you'll know what you are smoking.
Now there is a good argument. Would growing pot remain illegal? It might.
It could be set up that way, and I can see two reasons for the state to do it that way too.
1. They'd create STATE APPROVED production and distribution monopolies. Bureaucrats LIKE it when they get to decide who can make money.
2. It's a good way to get more TAX revenues, since home growers wouldn't be paying taxes (they'd cheat and not pay them, of course) so with only a few legal growers and a few legal distrubitors they can capture more tax revenues.
As to growing hemp?
Anybody in America with a small patch of land can grow enough helm to keep them and their friends in hemp for year.
EVen if only 1 in 25 pot smokers (that'd be say... about a million home growers) grew their own there'd be so much damned pot in the streets that its value would be squat.
If the state REALLY wants to make money from legalizing it they'll HAVE to make home growing (without paying taxes on it, at least) illegal.
I think so to, which would just start another fight. So we'd be right back at square one.