NAACP and Michelle Obama blasted by Peterson

[CurveLight]

I've no idea who peterson is but I'm guessing he's black because for some reason many racists think citing a black racist cancels out or camoflauges their own racism.

And many folks think that racism towards whit people is nothing more than racial pride.

Shut up

And many folks think that racism towards whit people is nothing more than racial pride.

Shut up

You're the non-sequitur queen and what is so sad is you're too stoopid to realize why.

CirlceJerk, I have a $100 bill that says you don't even know what non-sequitur means. I have beat you over the head with logic and facts in so many threads that it has became monotonous to me. But, I will give it another try


non se·qui·tur
   /nɒn ˈsɛkwɪtər, -ˌtʊər; Lat. noʊn ˈsɛkwɪˌtʊər/ Show Spelled[non sek-wi-ter, -toor; Lat. nohn se-kwi-toor] Show IPA
–noun
1.
Logic . an inference or a conclusion that does not follow from the premises.
2.
a statement containing an illogical conclusion.


Now let's examine my previous statement and see if we can deduce how you came to classify it as a non sequitar

And many folks think that racism towards whit people is nothing more than racial pride.

Ok, now let's start with definition 1. Did I deviate from the premises? Well seeings as how you made a statement about white people which I responded to, well the answer is obviously no.

So on to number two. Did I come to an illogical conclusion? Well, seeings as how groups such as La Raza and Black Panthers, both old and new; just to name a few, preach EXACTLY what I stated well then the answer obviously is no, I did NOT draw an illogical conclusion.

Which leads us to this. You sir add nothing of value to any conversations and should never EVER questions another person's contributions.

Hahahahahahaha........holy fuck you are one pathetic ass licking ****. How long before you shamelessly exploit a 2 year old to fill the void of your inability to debate?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Why do they still go by NAACP? In the world of PC-ness that has engulfed this country, you'd think they would have changed it NAAAAP.

Because it is a ok for them to call each other coloreds, *******, coons, silver backs, porch monkeys, jiggaboohs, or whatever. It is also ok for them to call us crackers, ******, white devils, etc etc

Got it? Good

But what happens when a white boy calls another white boy a ******?

Nothing.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I think just about anyone who can blast away at Barack or Michelle Obama these days will get a huge writeup by the right wing media and then have had their 15 minutes of fame.

Way to avoid the question

Okay, then, I think the good reverend is a prejudiced asshole. Better?

He's prejudiced against blacks?

 

[ConHog]

I've no idea who peterson is but I'm guessing he's black because for some reason many racists think citing a black racist cancels out or camoflauges their own racism.

And many folks think that racism towards whit people is nothing more than racial pride.

Shut up

You're the non-sequitur queen and what is so sad is you're too stoopid to realize why.

CirlceJerk, I have a $100 bill that says you don't even know what non-sequitur means. I have beat you over the head with logic and facts in so many threads that it has became monotonous to me. But, I will give it another try


non se·qui·tur
   /nɒn ˈsɛkwɪtər, -ˌtʊər; Lat. noʊn ˈsɛkwɪˌtʊər/ Show Spelled[non sek-wi-ter, -toor; Lat. nohn se-kwi-toor] Show IPA
–noun
1.
Logic . an inference or a conclusion that does not follow from the premises.
2.
a statement containing an illogical conclusion.


Now let's examine my previous statement and see if we can deduce how you came to classify it as a non sequitar

And many folks think that racism towards whit people is nothing more than racial pride.

Ok, now let's start with definition 1. Did I deviate from the premises? Well seeings as how you made a statement about white people which I responded to, well the answer is obviously no.

So on to number two. Did I come to an illogical conclusion? Well, seeings as how groups such as La Raza and Black Panthers, both old and new; just to name a few, preach EXACTLY what I stated well then the answer obviously is no, I did NOT draw an illogical conclusion.

Which leads us to this. You sir add nothing of value to any conversations and should never EVER questions another person's contributions.

Hahahahahahaha........holy fuck you are one pathetic ass licking ****. How long before you shamelessly exploit a 2 year old to fill the void of your inability to debate?

CircleJerk, I think if you got an honest assessment the consensus on this board would be that I Do indeed know how to debate.

 

[Gadawg73]

You mean there is a black person that makes negative comments about other blacks?
Wow, what a news story.

 

[CurveLight]

And many folks think that racism towards whit people is nothing more than racial pride.

Shut up

CirlceJerk, I have a $100 bill that says you don't even know what non-sequitur means. I have beat you over the head with logic and facts in so many threads that it has became monotonous to me. But, I will give it another try


non se·qui·tur
   /nɒn ˈsɛkwɪtər, -ˌtʊər; Lat. noʊn ˈsɛkwɪˌtʊər/ Show Spelled[non sek-wi-ter, -toor; Lat. nohn se-kwi-toor] Show IPA
–noun
1.
Logic . an inference or a conclusion that does not follow from the premises.
2.
a statement containing an illogical conclusion.


Now let's examine my previous statement and see if we can deduce how you came to classify it as a non sequitar

And many folks think that racism towards whit people is nothing more than racial pride.

Ok, now let's start with definition 1. Did I deviate from the premises? Well seeings as how you made a statement about white people which I responded to, well the answer is obviously no.

So on to number two. Did I come to an illogical conclusion? Well, seeings as how groups such as La Raza and Black Panthers, both old and new; just to name a few, preach EXACTLY what I stated well then the answer obviously is no, I did NOT draw an illogical conclusion.

Which leads us to this. You sir add nothing of value to any conversations and should never EVER questions another person's contributions.

Hahahahahahaha........holy fuck you are one pathetic ass licking ****. How long before you shamelessly exploit a 2 year old to fill the void of your inability to debate?

CircleJerk, I think if you got an honest assessment the consensus on this board would be that I Do indeed know how to debate.

Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Hahahahahahaha........holy fuck you are one pathetic ass licking ****. How long before you shamelessly exploit a 2 year old to fill the void of your inability to debate?

CircleJerk, I think if you got an honest assessment the consensus on this board would be that I Do indeed know how to debate.

Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My what great debating skills you have!

 

[ConHog]

CircleJerk, I think if you got an honest assessment the consensus on this board would be that I Do indeed know how to debate.

Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My what great debating skills you have!

Oh, don't mind CircleJerk, he's just so stupid that in his mind disagreeing with him = not being able to debate.

 

[CurveLight]

And many folks think that racism towards whit people is nothing more than racial pride.

Shut up

CirlceJerk, I have a $100 bill that says you don't even know what non-sequitur means. I have beat you over the head with logic and facts in so many threads that it has became monotonous to me. But, I will give it another try


non se·qui·tur
   /nɒn ˈsɛkwɪtər, -ˌtʊər; Lat. noʊn ˈsɛkwɪˌtʊər/ Show Spelled[non sek-wi-ter, -toor; Lat. nohn se-kwi-toor] Show IPA
–noun
1.
Logic . an inference or a conclusion that does not follow from the premises.
2.
a statement containing an illogical conclusion.


Now let's examine my previous statement and see if we can deduce how you came to classify it as a non sequitar

And many folks think that racism towards whit people is nothing more than racial pride.

Ok, now let's start with definition 1. Did I deviate from the premises? Well seeings as how you made a statement about white people which I responded to, well the answer is obviously no.

So on to number two. Did I come to an illogical conclusion? Well, seeings as how groups such as La Raza and Black Panthers, both old and new; just to name a few, preach EXACTLY what I stated well then the answer obviously is no, I did NOT draw an illogical conclusion.

Which leads us to this. You sir add nothing of value to any conversations and should never EVER questions another person's contributions.

Hahahahahahaha........holy fuck you are one pathetic ass licking ****. How long before you shamelessly exploit a 2 year old to fill the void of your inability to debate?

CircleJerk, I think if you got an honest assessment the consensus on this board would be that I Do indeed know how to debate.

Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My what great debating skills you have!

Oh, don't mind CircleJerk, he's just so stupid that in his mind disagreeing with him = not being able to debate.

I smacked your punk ass down so hard you were reduced to trying to hide behind a two year old and when that failed and you got pwned some more you went running and crying to Staff for help like a pure bitch. Lol!

 

[ConHog]

Hahahahahahaha........holy fuck you are one pathetic ass licking ****. How long before you shamelessly exploit a 2 year old to fill the void of your inability to debate?

CircleJerk, I think if you got an honest assessment the consensus on this board would be that I Do indeed know how to debate.

My what great debating skills you have!

Oh, don't mind CircleJerk, he's just so stupid that in his mind disagreeing with him = not being able to debate.

I smacked your punk ass down so hard you were reduced to trying to hide behind a two year old and when that failed and you got pwned some more you went running and crying to Staff for help like a pure bitch. Lol!

CircleJerk, feel free to post a link to ANY thread in which you truly believe you "smacked me down hard"

 

[Yurt]

Rev. Peterson Repudiates NAACP's Anti-Tea Party Resolution and Blasts Michelle Obama for Embracing Racist Black Group

Contact: Ermias Alemayehu, BOND Action, 323-556-2623

LOS ANGELES, July 14 /Standard Newswire/ -- Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson (photo), Founder and President of BOND Action, is repudiating the NAACP (National Association for The Advancement of Colored People) for passing a resolution condemning members of the conservative Tea Party movement as "racists." The NAACP is charging Tea Party members with using "racial epithets" and accusing them of engaging in "explicitly racist behavior." Rev. Peterson is calling the NAACP's claims "baseless" and is blasting First Lady Michelle Obama for appearing as the keynote speaker at their annual convention. The following is Rev. Peterson's statement:

"This resolution is a politically motivated attack by the NAACP designed to smear, intimidate, and derail a great conservative grass roots movement. Where's the NAACP's resolution condemning the New Black Panther Party and its members for advocating the killing of 'white crackers' and 'white babies'? Where's their proof of 'racist' Tea Party behavior? This is the height of hypocrisy.

"The NAACP is a racist and bigoted group. And shame on Michelle Obama for embracing their racist platform. Instead of condemning this hateful resolution and rebuking the organization, she encouraged them to 'increase their intensity.' This is pure wickedness.

"Barack Obama came to divide and the first lady and members of his administration are carrying out his radical socialist agenda. I encourage conservative white Americans to stand strong and not be intimidated by name-calling and accusations of 'racism.'

Rev. Peterson Repudiates NAACP's Anti-Tea Party Resolution and Blasts Michelle Obama for Embracing Racist Black Group - Standard Newswire

we need more brave americans like this

I read the NAACP resolution and I am not bothered by it at all. I feel that some of it is off base but the part where they call on tea partiers to denounce any racially themed signage and where they ask the tea party to publicly state they dont support racial hate groups is a great suggestion...and i'm going to do as they ask.

why doesn't the naacp call on any other group, including themselves, to denounce ALL racism amongst their group?

why is it the naacp only singles out the tea party?

 

[Yurt]

You said we need more brave Americans like him. Not my fault you didn't bother to see if he made any stupid statements prior to that.

you're a proving yourself to be nothing but a troll hack

one can think someone brave, and still not agree with everything they say....

i thought that was pretty simple thing to understand, i guess not for you...too bad

btw, nothwithstanding your lame trolling here, do you agree or disagree with the substance of what he said? or this yet another troll attack on dear ol' yurt while you ignore the substance of the thread? you know, thread derailment that you always whine others are doing....

Why is it anyone who posts more than once in a thread is considered by some of you idiots as "trolls"??? What the fuck does that make YOU?

nice idiotic strawman

 

[ConHog]

Rev. Peterson Repudiates NAACP's Anti-Tea Party Resolution and Blasts Michelle Obama for Embracing Racist Black Group

Contact: Ermias Alemayehu, BOND Action, 323-556-2623

LOS ANGELES, July 14 /Standard Newswire/ -- Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson (photo), Founder and President of BOND Action, is repudiating the NAACP (National Association for The Advancement of Colored People) for passing a resolution condemning members of the conservative Tea Party movement as "racists." The NAACP is charging Tea Party members with using "racial epithets" and accusing them of engaging in "explicitly racist behavior." Rev. Peterson is calling the NAACP's claims "baseless" and is blasting First Lady Michelle Obama for appearing as the keynote speaker at their annual convention. The following is Rev. Peterson's statement:

"This resolution is a politically motivated attack by the NAACP designed to smear, intimidate, and derail a great conservative grass roots movement. Where's the NAACP's resolution condemning the New Black Panther Party and its members for advocating the killing of 'white crackers' and 'white babies'? Where's their proof of 'racist' Tea Party behavior? This is the height of hypocrisy.

"The NAACP is a racist and bigoted group. And shame on Michelle Obama for embracing their racist platform. Instead of condemning this hateful resolution and rebuking the organization, she encouraged them to 'increase their intensity.' This is pure wickedness.

"Barack Obama came to divide and the first lady and members of his administration are carrying out his radical socialist agenda. I encourage conservative white Americans to stand strong and not be intimidated by name-calling and accusations of 'racism.'

Rev. Peterson Repudiates NAACP's Anti-Tea Party Resolution and Blasts Michelle Obama for Embracing Racist Black Group - Standard Newswire

we need more brave americans like this

I read the NAACP resolution and I am not bothered by it at all. I feel that some of it is off base but the part where they call on tea partiers to denounce any racially themed signage and where they ask the tea party to publicly state they dont support racial hate groups is a great suggestion...and i'm going to do as they ask.

why doesn't the naacp call on any other group, including themselves, to denounce ALL racism amongst their group?

why is it the naacp only singles out the tea party?

Simple, because they don't REALLY want racism to die out. If that happened what purpose would they serve. No, they need to fan the flames to justify their own existence.

 

[Yurt]

are you tired from running modberty?

Speaking of running ...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/law-and-justice-system/124446-former-acorn-employee-sues-o-keefe-and-giles.html

?

what are you babbling about? i know you always have to run over and defend little modbert because he is an immature 95 pound mental weakling...but this was beneath even you

perhaps you ought to be honest and ask modbert why he has run away from his original premise after being shown how stupid it is and perhaps you ought to be honest and admit how stupid his premise is instead of blindly defending him....it doesn't help him mature

 

[Yurt]

I think just about anyone who can blast away at Barack or Michelle Obama these days will get a huge writeup by the right wing media and then have had their 15 minutes of fame.

Way to avoid the question

Okay, then, I think the good reverend is a prejudiced asshole. Better?

how is this particular comment prejudice...you still haven't actually answered my question about this particular comment

all you're doing is attacking the messenger and ignoring the message

 

[CurveLight]

CircleJerk, I think if you got an honest assessment the consensus on this board would be that I Do indeed know how to debate.

Oh, don't mind CircleJerk, he's just so stupid that in his mind disagreeing with him = not being able to debate.

I smacked your punk ass down so hard you were reduced to trying to hide behind a two year old and when that failed and you got pwned some more you went running and crying to Staff for help like a pure bitch. Lol!

CircleJerk, feel free to post a link to ANY thread in which you truly believe you "smacked me down hard"

I smacked your punk ass down so hard you were reduced to trying to hide behind a two year old and when that failed and you got pwned some more you went running and crying to Staff for help like a pure bitch. Lol!

 

[ConHog]

Oh that is too rich, Curved makes a false claim, which I challenge him to back up by the way, and Ravi thanks him.

You two combined couldn't out debate my teenage son. Ravi, all I have to do is mention the Sanctuary city thread and you're 38 factual errors, some would say lies, within 5 pages to prove you're an idiot.

Curved, suffice to say, no evidence is required to prove to this board that you are an idiot.

 

[Modbert]

Lawl. Running from what? I made my point, you refused to listen to reason, and I decided to not bother going back and forth with you. Watching Conhog and Yurt cry as Yurt continues to try and be a attention whore by bumping his thread saying I'm running is hilarious.

Yurt, why don't you go and post in the thread that Art asked you to do so you hypocrite of epic proportions.

 

[ConHog]

Lawl. Running from what? I made my point, you refused to listen to reason, and I decided to not bother going back and forth with you. Watching Conhog and Yurt cry as Yurt continues to try and be a attention whore by bumping his thread saying I'm running is hilarious.

Yurt, why don't you go and post in the thread that Art asked you to do so you hypocrite of epic proportions.

Watching you call someone a hypocrite is the height of hilarity.

 

[Yurt]

Lawl. Running from what? I made my point, you refused to listen to reason, and I decided to not bother going back and forth with you. Watching Conhog and Yurt cry as Yurt continues to try and be a attention whore by bumping his thread saying I'm running is hilarious.

Yurt, why don't you go and post in the thread that Art asked you to do so you hypocrite of epic proportions.

why are you such a liar? you did not at all address my response to your immature and faulty logic.

i have no idea what art was talking about, hence my question to HIM.

i am not surprise at your cowardice in refusing to address my post and not at all surprised your trolling by not actually addressing the substance of the thread, rather, your troll obsessive attack on dear ol' yurt, perhaps you ought not to be such a hypocrite and whine about others derailing threads when all you pretty much do is derail threads and then run when you realize how stupid you look