CDZ my opinion on the Derick Chauvin case

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,569
Reaction score
783
Points
140
Did the toxicologist who testified in the trial mention Floyd’s COVID-19 infection?
 

otto105

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
8,185
Reaction score
1,361
Points
170
This is a very quick verdict. There wasn't much discussion going on.

They feared for their lives if they came back with the correct verdict.
According to whom?

They were presented evidence from both sides and made their verdict based on that fact.

You're the one crying and making misguided statements regarding it.
 

DudleySmith

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2020
Messages
1,956
Reaction score
1,200
Points
903
This is a very quick verdict. There wasn't much discussion going on.

They feared for their lives if they came back with the correct verdict.
According to whom?

They were presented evidence from both sides and made their verdict based on that fact.

You're the one crying and making misguided statements regarding it.
Commie scum's opinions are meaningless drivel. Thanks for stepping up and reminding us.
 

otto105

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
8,185
Reaction score
1,361
Points
170
This is a very quick verdict. There wasn't much discussion going on.

They feared for their lives if they came back with the correct verdict.
According to whom?

They were presented evidence from both sides and made their verdict based on that fact.

You're the one crying and making misguided statements regarding it.
Commie scum's opinions are meaningless drivel. Thanks for stepping up and reminding us.
The American justice system is now communist because you disagree with a verdict.
 

DrLove

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
28,850
Reaction score
12,041
Points
1,100
Location
Central Oregon Coast
(1) per the offending officer's training, he might *not* have been unreasonable in his use of force.

(2) a slight realignment of training procedures for street cops across the world, would allow for the deceased to have stayed alive, to stand up with his back toward the car upon the realization that the now-deceased had personal problems getting into the police car. a police officer can let the person that they want to arrest, stand up, handcuffed, and with instructions not to move or a taser will be used.

this severe restraining of a person on the ground has to be let go of.

it's better than recurring tragedies *and* the follow-on riots.

this whole idea of physically restraining a person, just causes a struggle that is *likely* to result in great bodily harm, to officers or suspects, even to the audience of such events.

by letting a person stand, politely handcuffing them (if possible), and using your taser at a safe distance to keep a person in the same spot,
a chance for dialogue evolves and *can* be brought to fruition (in the Derick Chauvin case : arrival of a police van to transport the suspect.)

police just needs some verbal de-escalation skills worked into their recurring training.

CNN, US Media : use this please, to direct attention from "demonstrations" (riots) to preventing a repeat of such incidents through "police reform", which does not even need to include a "defunding" of the police.

and finally, what fate awaits the defendant in this case, if he has to go to jail for decades?
will it be a normal jail, or one designed to house only ex-police officers.

as we all know from the movies, ordinary jail is no place to house an ex-police officer.
it's simply put exceedingly excessive punishment.

the deceased's suffering was over in about 15 minutes total.

do we put the man who accidentally caused his death in conditions of near torturous punishment for *decades* over this?

the only thing that's left, is to blame this entire event on erroneously designed police training, and for the jury to acquit the defendant.

Put the murderous bitch in general population :)
 

DudleySmith

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2020
Messages
1,956
Reaction score
1,200
Points
903
This is a very quick verdict. There wasn't much discussion going on.

They feared for their lives if they came back with the correct verdict.
According to whom?

They were presented evidence from both sides and made their verdict based on that fact.

You're the one crying and making misguided statements regarding it.
Commie scum's opinions are meaningless drivel. Thanks for stepping up and reminding us.
The American justice system is now communist because you disagree with a verdict.

Oh noes, I was 'Touched Last!!!' on the innernetz.
 

otto105

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
8,185
Reaction score
1,361
Points
170
This is a very quick verdict. There wasn't much discussion going on.

They feared for their lives if they came back with the correct verdict.
According to whom?

They were presented evidence from both sides and made their verdict based on that fact.

You're the one crying and making misguided statements regarding it.
Commie scum's opinions are meaningless drivel. Thanks for stepping up and reminding us.
The American justice system is now communist because you disagree with a verdict.

Oh noes, I was 'Touched Last!!!' on the innernetz.
I put a call into the English department for you.
 

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,569
Reaction score
783
Points
140
Most Dipshit post #102: Both the fentanyl (was it Chinese?) and the COVID-19 virus was increasing hypoxia pathway gene expression before Chauvin applied the knee. Do you understand what hypoxia is and what this means, Cocksuck?
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top