My god a judge with a brain...

[insein]

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20041024/D85TG1380.html

Ohio Provisional Ballot Ruling Reversed


Email this Story

Oct 23, 9:08 PM (ET)

By JOE KAY

CINCINNATI (AP) - A federal appeals court ruled Saturday that provisional ballots Ohio voters cast outside their own precincts should not be counted, throwing out a lower-court decision that said such ballots are valid as long as they are cast in the correct county.

The ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals supports an order issued by Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell. Democrats contend the Republican official's rules are too restrictive and allege they are intended to suppress the vote.

Ohio Democrats on Saturday night decided not to file an appeal in the case, one of the first major tests of how such ballots will be handled in a close election. Polls show that the race between President Bush and Sen. John Kerry in the key swing state is too close to call.

Federal judges in several states have issued varying rulings on the issue of provisional ballots, which are intended to be backups for eligible voters whose names do not appear on the rolls. Saturday's ruling was the first time a federal appeals court has weighed in.

The state's Democrats had filed a lawsuit challenging Blackwell's directive instructing county elections boards not to give ballots to voters who come to the wrong precinct and to send them to the correct polling place on Election Day.

Blackwell has said allowing voters to cast a ballot wherever they show up, even if they're not registered to vote there, is a recipe for Election Day chaos.

The Ohio Democratic Party and a coalition of labor and voter rights groups had argued that Blackwell's order discriminated against the poor and minorities, who tend to move more frequently.

U.S. District Judge James Carr on Oct. 14 blocked Blackwell's directive, ruling that Ohio voters who show up at the wrong polling place still can cast ballots as long as they are in the county where they are registered. Blackwell appealed to the 6th Circuit.

"Today's ruling reaffirms Secretary Blackwell's understanding of the law," Blackwell spokesman Carlo LoParo said in a statement. "Unfortunately the frivolous lawsuits filed by the Ohio Democratic Party and its allies have needlessly wasted the valuable time of election officials across the state as they prepare for this important election."

Democrats said Saturday they were disappointed by the ruling but were ready to move on with election preparations.

"To avoid any confusion, we are not going to appeal this ruling," David Sullivan, voter protection coordinator for the Ohio Democratic Party, said in a statement. "That way we can ensure that voters and election officials understand that voters must be in the proper polling place before casting a vote."

Similar court battles are under way in other states. In Florida, a federal judge ruled Thursday that the state must reject provisional ballots if they are cast in the wrong precinct.

In Michigan, a federal judge said those ballots must be counted if cast by voters at the wrong precinct but in the right city, township or village. That decision also has been appealed to the 6th Circuit, but the appellate court has yet to issue a ruling in that case.

In Missouri and Colorado, judges have ruled that votes in the wrong place don't have to be counted.

Provisional ballots are not counted until after the election. They are set aside and inspected by Democratic and Republican election board employees to establish their validity.

States nationwide have adopted individual standards for when a provisional ballot can be cast and counted. Twenty-six states and the District of Columbia require a provisional ballot to be cast in the correct precinct, or it will not count.

In 2000, Bush beat Al Gore by only 3.6 percentage points in Ohio, which went for Democrat Bill Clinton in the two previous elections. More than 100,000 provisional ballots were cast in Ohio during the 2000 election.

Thank god for this Blackwell guy. Common Sense might have a chance to prevail. We've had elections for 200+ years now and all of sudden People in Ohio This year are now being disenfranchised? This is all an attempt by Democrats to vote early, vote often with little restrictions in the way.

 

[Hobbit]

Voting in your own district is a great idea, as it cuts down on voter fraud, which is something the libs don't want.

 

[musicman]

Blackwell is a cool guy. Keep your eye on him - he's going places.

 

[Mr. P]

How about this folks..take the known fraud out for a moment, okay.

Now many counties are divided in the country between different districts. My neighbor across the street may not
have the same senator/congressman to vote for/against as I do. Not to mention the local issues. So allowing this "vote anywhere" is a disservice to the electorate and the system in place.

 

[Flying Duck]

If you're too dumb or lazy to vote at the right place, then your vote shouldn't count.

 

[Mr. P]

If you're too dumb or lazy to vote at the right place, then your vote shouldn't count.

I agree, Duck! Same as the undecided....if they don't by know now...they're Dumb-masses.

 

[Merlin1047]

You people just have no appreciation for nuance.

This is obviously just another attempt by right wing Republicans to disenfranchise the voter, especially blacks, hispanics.

In addition, right wingers have an ongoing campaign to marginalize homosexuals, trans-gender, cross-dressers, pedophiles, felons, Theresa and Hillary. How can you expect to have a truly unified nation if you continue your attempts to deprive these fine folks of their rightful place in society?

Vote early, vote often!

Somebody pass me a flower.

 

[Avatar4321]

Ive heard a Judge in Michagan thought the same thing. The Dems must be so desperate if they are making such a blatant attempt at voter fraud.