My fellow righties, you're being massive hypocrites

[bodecea]

Day by day. Trump's Chumps are devolving. Getting sicker and sicker in the head.

Trump is the Great Deceiver. He has led the weak into becoming the soulless followers of evil they used to hate.

Have you heard the latest from some past Miss Teen America contestants? Former Miss Teen USA Contestants: Trump Walked Into Our Dressing Rooms

Seems to match up with some bragging he did on Howard Stern.

 

[bodecea]

You said that Nancy Pelosi called Bill Clinton a rapist....where is that quote?

YOU LIE!

POST #274: MY EXACT QUOTE:
"Nancy Pelosi ACTUALLY came out and declared that 'Bill Clinton's Rapes Are In The Past So There is NO Concern There'."

I do NOT say Nancy Pelosi called Clinton a RAPIST. I said she argued that his 'Rapes' - for which he has been accused - 'Are in the Past'!

Feel free to apologize when ready....oh wait, that's right - as the Clintons have shown (unlike Trump) - Liberals don't apologize. They spin....so go right ahead.

Are you aware that words have meanings? If you say that Nancy Pelosi stated (and you used quotes) "Bill Clinton's Rapes are in the Past".....you are claiming that Nancy Pelosi is calling him a rapist.

Still not seeing you link to her exact quote.

 

[easyt65]

Are you aware that words have meanings?

Yes, I am. Evidently YOU AREN'T.

Please quote where I said, 'Nancy Pelosi said / called Bill Clinton a rapist'!

Pelosi was obviously arguing that whatever Bill Clinton did was in the past as he is not running for office.

 

[320 Years of History]

Locker room banter.

One can try to discount the severity of the fact that the man made the remarks he did in that video. On can call it "locker room" talk. Well, that's a non-starter as far as I'm concerned. Sure, teenage boys may make remarks of that nature in the locker room. Why, among other reasons, might they do so? Well, because they've been taught (tacitly if no other way) that it's an appropriate, or at least acceptable to think of women and their actions toward them that way. But then, one hopes, those boys grow up and become gentlemen and they realise their thinking needs a "course correction" and they alter their attitudes. Trump is not a teenager nor was he in 2005.

Have I heard similar out of line remarks in locker rooms and made by other adult males? Yes. That I have, and that those men have those attitudes does not make having them be right. That they have those beliefs does not exculpate them or others from their moral depravity toward women. It merely means that Trump isn't the only debauched man one might find. That is not a good thing.

That some men have those attitudes is one thing, but how they make amends for having them is what matters most. The thing is that Trump's deeds and attitudes toward women aren't things for which one "flips a switch" to alter; therefore a mere apology isn't enough, no matter how contrite or contrived. The attitudes he has about how he may interact with women, his attitudes about the liberties he can with women unbidden take, have been his for 70 years. They are not going anywhere just because a video illustrating their existence surfaced and he was shamed into offering a half-assed bunch of words that he wants us to construe as an apology.

One must "own one's sh*t" and demonstrate proportionately that one has ceased to have the same failing(s). It's not pleasant to do things, say things and believe things that are repugnant and reprehensible, but folks do. Nobody likes their "dirty laundry" aired for all to see; however, if one knew their "laundry was dirty," it was incumbent upon them right then and there to clean it up. Waiting until everyone else found out about it is about the latest point at which one can begin the clean up process. Make no mistake, though. Cleaning up 70 years, or 50 years of "dirty laundry" doesn't happen in a matter of minutes or even months. There just is no quick fix for that sort of thing.

So, yes, you can be a hypocrite. You can make light of Trump's remarks as those befitting teenagers in locker rooms. You can even try to persuade others to agree with you. You can do that and more, but that you do those things at all causes you to lose all credibility on all matters whereof you write or speak about morality. You see, "telling it like it is" is something one must do when "what it is" and "how it is" benefits one, but even more importantly than doing so when on is "in the right," one must do so with utmost integrity when one is in the wrong.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Who are the real hypocrites?

BREAKING today


Video from 2008 Campaign Appears to Show Obama Flaunting Erection to Female Reporters

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

What do you care? Obama wasted 9 trillion and counting of American tax dollars.

QUICK !!!!! divert the damning focus from Trump to Obama....what took you so long????LOL

I don't consider that diverting at all. Hillary would be a third Obama term. That's the issue at hand.

And.....that's a GOOD thing.

Obama was a failure, dude.

He's just fine....and elected twice over GOP candidates as well. Have you seen his latest polls?

Frankly, I'm not even sure that the McCain election wasn't rigged. We know the Obama election was. I don't care about the made up polls either. It's all nonsense.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

We crucified Bill Clinton
We crucified Anthony Weiner

We are apparently giving Donald Trump a complete pass. We have relinquished any position of moral clarity or public image of taking the High Road.

I will give him any pass necessary to keep the Democrats out of office. I really, truly don't give a rat's ass about anyone's moral dilemma.

So...Drumpf was right when he said that he could shoot someone on 5th Ave. in broad daylight and you'd still support him.

In opposition to Democrats? Damn right.

 

[hunarcy]

Yes, and I wouldn't vote for any of THEM, either.

Yes, and I wouldn't vote for any of THEM, either.

Yes, and I wouldn't vote for any of THEM, either.

Excellent! Vote Jill Stein! She only has public positions and doesn't say different things behind closed doors or in private speeches to Goldman/Sachs.

Yeah, but I'd rather open a vein than live in the world according to Jill Stein, so that's a bit of a sticking point.

Yeah, you'd rather support a liar who has no moral center. You're not someone whose opinion I think I'll value.

Remind me to pencil in some time later this week to not give a shit about the assumptions and projections of a three-toothed, fanatical cretin hyping Donald Trump as a serious candidate for the Presidency.

You are a fecklessmoron

 

[hunarcy]

Yes, and I wouldn't vote for any of THEM, either.

Yes, and I wouldn't vote for any of THEM, either.

Yes, and I wouldn't vote for any of THEM, either.

Excellent! Vote Jill Stein! She only has public positions and doesn't say different things behind closed doors or in private speeches to Goldman/Sachs.

Yeah, but I'd rather open a vein than live in the world according to Jill Stein, so that's a bit of a sticking point.

Yeah, you'd rather support a liar who has no moral center. You're not someone whose opinion I think I'll value.

Apparently...actually OBVIOUSLY...you are a Drumpfster. You can't read very well, low education. Because if you'd had even a 10th grade education, you would have comprehended that Cecilie VERY CLEARLY said she isn't supporting any of the choices.

Wow, you're another feckless moron. If you'd taken the trouble to really try to understand, you'd see that she was saying she wouldn't vote for any of the millions upon millions of Men and Women who bragged about their sexual escapades in response to the image posted, not that she didn't intend to vote for Hillary Clinton. Your assumptions about my choice for President, my education and even intelligence merely shows you're an a Clinton reactionary poster, making you a mindless jerk. Thanks for proving that the average 10th grader is more educated than you.

 

[ptbw forever]

Locker room banter.

One can try to discount the severity of the fact that the man made the remarks he did in that video. On can call it "locker room" talk. Well, that's a non-starter as far as I'm concerned. Sure, teenage boys may make remarks of that nature in the locker room. Why, among other reasons, might they do so? Well, because they've been taught (tacitly if no other way) that it's an appropriate, or at least acceptable to think of women and their actions toward them that way. But then, one hopes, those boys grow up and become gentlemen and they realise their thinking needs a "course correction" and they alter their attitudes. Trump is not a teenager nor was he in 2005.

Have I heard similar out of line remarks in locker rooms and made by other adult males? Yes. That I have, and that those men have those attitudes does not make having them be right. That they have those beliefs does not exculpate them or others from their moral depravity toward women. It merely means that Trump isn't the only debauched man one might find. That is not a good thing.

That some men have those attitudes is one thing, but how they make amends for having them is what matters most. The thing is that Trump's deeds and attitudes toward women aren't things for which one "flips a switch" to alter; therefore a mere apology isn't enough, no matter how contrite or contrived. The attitudes he has about how he may interact with women, his attitudes about the liberties he can with women unbidden take, have been his for 70 years. They are not going anywhere just because a video illustrating their existence surfaced and he was shamed into offering a half-assed bunch of words that he wants us to construe as an apology.

One must "own one's sh*t" and demonstrate proportionately that one has ceased to have the same failing(s). It's not pleasant to do things, say things and believe things that are repugnant and reprehensible, but folks do. Nobody likes their "dirty laundry" aired for all to see; however, if one knew their "laundry was dirty," it was incumbent upon them right then and there to clean it up. Waiting until everyone else found out about it is about the latest point at which one can begin the clean up process. Make no mistake, though. Cleaning up 70 years, or 50 years of "dirty laundry" doesn't happen in a matter of minutes or even months. There just is no quick fix for that sort of thing.

So, yes, you can be a hypocrite. You can make light of Trump's remarks as those befitting teenagers in locker rooms. You can even try to persuade others to agree with you. You can do that and more, but that you do those things at all causes you to lose all credibility on all matters whereof you write or speak about morality. You see, "telling it like it is" is something one must do when "what it is" and "how it is" benefits one, but even more importantly than doing so when on is "in the right," one must do so with utmost integrity when one is in the wrong.

No one is explicitly teaching boys to disrespect women.

Schools are actually destroying boys with explicitly feminist guided curriculum.

The only ones telling boys to mistreat women are Democrat assholes who are defending porn as "free speech" and "art".

 

[owebo]

We crucified Bill Clinton
We crucified Anthony Weiner

We are apparently giving Donald Trump a complete pass. We have relinquished any position of moral clarity or public image of taking the High Road.

We are not you GOP'ers.....

 

[conserveguy877]

It's hilarious how the leftist men are all the sudden so virginal .....oh wait, maybe they are

Just embrace the desperation.

It's hysterical watching godless, no moral leftists find morals all the sudden.

It's even funnier watching you Jesus freaks play nasty and sin...

Says the user judging someone which is proving the point.

 

[Moonglow]

It's hilarious how the leftist men are all the sudden so virginal .....oh wait, maybe they are

Just embrace the desperation.

It's hysterical watching godless, no moral leftists find morals all the sudden.

It's even funnier watching you Jesus freaks play nasty and sin...

Says the user judging someone which is proving the point.

I didn't set the bar, the Bible did..Just cause many can't jump that high is not my problem...

 

[Cecilie1200]

Yes, and I wouldn't vote for any of THEM, either.

Yes, and I wouldn't vote for any of THEM, either.

Yes, and I wouldn't vote for any of THEM, either.

Excellent! Vote Jill Stein! She only has public positions and doesn't say different things behind closed doors or in private speeches to Goldman/Sachs.

Yeah, but I'd rather open a vein than live in the world according to Jill Stein, so that's a bit of a sticking point.

Yeah, you'd rather support a liar who has no moral center. You're not someone whose opinion I think I'll value.

Remind me to pencil in some time later this week to not give a shit about the assumptions and projections of a three-toothed, fanatical cretin hyping Donald Trump as a serious candidate for the Presidency.

You are a fecklessmoron

You either have no idea what that word actually means (FYI, "feckless" and "moron" are TWO words, not one), or you simply don't appreciate the supreme irony of calling someone "feckless" for not supporting Donald Trump, of all people.

Either way, you clearly missed the whole "don't give a shit" component of my post.

 

[PredFan]

We crucified Bill Clinton.

Oh yeah, we crucified him right. Poor guy is a shadow of his former self. Totally destroyed right? Where is he now I wonder?

We crucified Anthony Weiner.

There was no doubt if his guilt. The pictures are there. Trump has only been accused and there is no proof and plenty of reason to doubt.

We are apparently giving Donald Trump a complete pass. We have relinquished any position of moral clarity or public image of taking the High Road.

Untrue. Many have denounced the things he said and as far as the accusations, again, there is no proof and plenty of very reasonable doubt.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

We crucified Bill Clinton.

Oh yeah, we crucified him right. Poor guy is a shadow of his former self. Totally destroyed right? Where is he now I wonder?

We crucified Anthony Weiner.

There was no doubt if his guilt. The pictures are there. Trump has only been accused and there is no proof and plenty of reason to doubt.

We are apparently giving Donald Trump a complete pass. We have relinquished any position of moral clarity or public image of taking the High Road.

Untrue. Many have denounced the things he said and as far as the accusations, again, there is no proof and plenty of very reasonable doubt.

People are now denouncing him because of the mountain of evidence. At the time this thread was created he was being staunchly defended. My op is an accurate assessment of many

 

[nat4900]

Oh yeah, we crucified him right. Poor guy is a shadow of his former self. Totally destroyed right? Where is he now I wonder?

Even an idiot such as you should be able to distinguish between "crucifying" someone, AND being successful at it.....But maybe I'm giving you too much credit.

 

[PredFan]

We crucified Bill Clinton.

Oh yeah, we crucified him right. Poor guy is a shadow of his former self. Totally destroyed right? Where is he now I wonder?

We crucified Anthony Weiner.

There was no doubt if his guilt. The pictures are there. Trump has only been accused and there is no proof and plenty of reason to doubt.

We are apparently giving Donald Trump a complete pass. We have relinquished any position of moral clarity or public image of taking the High Road.

Untrue. Many have denounced the things he said and as far as the accusations, again, there is no proof and plenty of very reasonable doubt.

People are now denouncing him because of the mountain of evidence. At the time this thread was created he was being staunchly defended. My op is an accurate assessment of many

There isn't a shred of evidence.

 

[PredFan]

Oh yeah, we crucified him right. Poor guy is a shadow of his former self. Totally destroyed right? Where is he now I wonder?

Even an idiot such as you should be able to distinguish between "crucifying" someone, AND being successful at it.....But maybe I'm giving you too much credit.

So you can crucify someone and nothing ever happens to him? Must be some new definition of crucify that I hadn't previously been aware of. Or it's just that you are the idiot we all know you to be.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Oh yeah, we crucified him right. Poor guy is a shadow of his former self. Totally destroyed right? Where is he now I wonder?

Even an idiot such as you should be able to distinguish between "crucifying" someone, AND being successful at it.....But maybe I'm giving you too much credit.

So you can crucify someone and nothing ever happens to him? Must be some new definition of crucify that I hadn't previously been aware of. Or it's just that you are the idiot we all know you to be.

Crucify is a figure of speech. If you want to play semantics you can do so by yourself.