I wonder if liberals will enjoy the Muslim dominated world they are trying to create.
If liberals were sane, they would do everything they could to oppose Islam.
How many beheadings and honor killings do Muslims have to do before liberals wake up to reality?
Neither of those is "Islamic". See if you can pull your head out of your ass under your own power.
Honor killings and beheadings aren't Islamic? On what planet?
On every planet. Duh.
We've done this myth to death. These are cultural artifacts far older than Islam, Christianism, Hinduism, Sikhism or any other faiths coincident with them, and you can toss female genital mutilation in the same bag. They have nothing to do with any of these religions and everything to do with ancient
social structures related to
social status. Correlation is not causation.
-- and they're
geography-specific anyway.
It's like declaring "the Grand Canyon is in the United States, therefore it's a Christian Canyon".
-- Actually it's more like declaring "therefore
all canyons are Christian canyons -- even if they're in India".
The fatal flaw in this thread, from the beginning, has been it starts out claiming "Muslims define their religion" and then immediately proceeds to define it FOR them based on a gaggle of fallacious causation fallacies, none of which are even documented. He's in fact saying "myths and memes that we make up from a distance define their religion".
It's no different from the "Jews are evil / Blacks are rapists / Hispanics are lazy / Irish are drunks / Italians are greasy" myths and memes. Tales told by idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Proving once again that bigotry is based on wilful ignorance.
Excellent. Strawman followed by the old "Everybody Knows" fallacy. My, this thread is progressing swimmingly.
