Musk rocket crashes again. No casualties

[Tommy Tainant]

NASA has killed 18 people.

Nasa got to the moon and back. Many times. Why doesnt muskie pick up his phone and ask them how they did it ? That would be cheaper in the long run.

 

[martybegan]

What makes you say my source is bullshit?

Orion already made it to the moon, dipshit. That’s what Artemis 1 was. It entered a distant retrograde orbit which has even lower delta v requirements than NRHO.

The SpaceX HLS is going to be many years from development and probably will be scrapped. The lunar gateway is the same thing. All of these are required before setting foot on the moon which is why the mission profile is so stupid.

What happened to "it can never get stuff to the moon"?

Now you go to HLS of which Starship is under testing. SpaceX got Falcon to work and I am sure they will get Starship to work.

 

[Harry Dresden]

NASA has provided a wealth of information and data about our universe.

Very little of that came from the manned space program, despite taking up a huge part of the budget.

and from what i read when i posted that info i put up we are learning a lot about rockets with space x....who else has brought one back and had it land on the launch site?....thats something they have wanted to do for quite a while....yea i know you think its a waste of time....

 

[marvin martian]

View attachment 1116486

Has the nerve to criticize the genius of the richest man in the world while he sits at a computer and eats cake and ice cream all day while doing his best Hitler impression...

The good news is that Tommy Tainant ate, drank, and smoked himself into being a useless cripple, and won't be a problem for much longer.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Nasa got to the moon and back. Many times. Why doesnt muskie pick up his phone and ask them how they did it ? That would be cheaper in the long run.

tommy who do you think he is working with?...

 

[Marener]

What happened to "it can never get stuff to the moon"?

Now you go to HLS of which Starship is under testing. SpaceX got Falcon to work and I am sure they will get Starship to work.

What happened is I never said that exactly. I chose my words carefully but you’re too fucking stupid to understand what I’ve been saying.

The stupidity of HLS doesn’t just stop with a functioning booster. Once they get that thing to orbit, they’re going to have to send up about a dozen tankers to refuel it for it to get to the moon.

This is yet again trying to fit a mission to a rocket instead of the other way around.

 

[westwall]

They are guarenteed to crash. I dont understand. Nasa cracked this in the 60s. What is so diffficult ?

Oh? You already forget about Columbia and Challenger?

Figures, you're a mental midget.

 

[Donald H]

If only that damn dog didn't eat all of Nasa's homework!

 

[martybegan]

What happened is I never said that exactly. I chose my words carefully but you’re too fucking stupid to understand what I’ve been saying.

The stupidity of HLS doesn’t just stop with a functioning booster. Once they get that thing to orbit, they’re going to have to send up about a dozen tankers to refuel it for it to get to the moon.

This is yet again trying to fit a mission to a rocket instead of the other way around.

Nope, you make shit up and go all chickenshit on something, then when called out run away from the issue like a bitch, and find something new to be chickenshit about.

Says the pretend rocket science that probably has a degree in late neo-lithic buggery.

 

[Marener]

and from what i read when i posted that info i put up we are learning a lot about rockets with space x....who else has brought one back and had it land on the launch site?....thats something they have wanted to do for quite a while....yea i know you think its a waste of time....

I don’t really give a shit about the rockets. I care about actual scientific advancements. Rockets are a tool.

 

[Harry Dresden]

What happened is I never said that exactly. I chose my words carefully but you’re too fucking stupid to understand what I’ve been saying.

The stupidity of HLS doesn’t just stop with a functioning booster. Once they get that thing to orbit, they’re going to have to send up about a dozen tankers to refuel it for it to get to the moon.

This is yet again trying to fit a mission to a rocket instead of the other way around.

it will go to an orbiting fuel depot that already has the fuel there...

 

[Marener]

Nope, you make shit up and go all chickenshit on something, then when called out run away from the issue like a bitch, and find something new to be chickenshit about.

Says the pretend rocket science that probably has a degree in late neo-lithic buggery.

Show me where I said SLS can “never get stuff to the moon”.

Put up or shut up.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Nasa got to the moon and back. Many times. Why doesnt muskie pick up his phone and ask them how they did it ? That would be cheaper in the long run.

More partisan hackery you idiot's really can not help yourself. SpaceX isn't the bloated bureaucracy NASA is the company does things cheaper and better than any government ran program ever could. NASA killed 3 astronauts during the Apollo program.

 

[Harry Dresden]

I don’t really give a shit about the rockets. I care about actual scientific advancements. Rockets are a tool.

and of course you dont think the space program has given us many scientific advancements?...right?...

 

[Marener]

it will go to an orbiting fuel depot that already has the fuel there...

And the fuel depot, which doesn’t exist, will have to be filled with over a dozen tankers, and that’s IF they can develop the tankers with the payload capacity they’re hoping for.

 

[Marener]

and of course you dont think the space program has given us many scientific advancements?...right?...

We’ve had tons of scientific advancements from the space program, but the vast majority has come from unmanned missions.

 

[Harry Dresden]

And the fuel depot, which doesn’t exist, will have to be filled with over a dozen tankers, and that’s IF they can develop the tankers with the payload capacity they’re hoping for.

geezus im glad i didnt have any science teachers with your closed mindness.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

We’ve had tons of scientific advancements from the space program, but the vast majority has come from unmanned missions.

its called progress ....yea i know its a strange word....

 

[Marener]

geezus im glad i didnt have any science teachers with your closed mindness.....

Closed minded is not being able to see the stupidity of a mission design because you’ve already sunk money into it.

If you actually want a manned space program to work, it can’t be needlessly expensive and complicated.

We’ve spend decades accomplishing very little with manned space flight despite spending tens of billions. We need a radical shift.

 

[martybegan]

Show me where I said SLS can “never get stuff to the moon”.

Put up or shut up.

You've been implying it this whole fucking thread, you dumbfuck.