Murkowski, Paul, McConnell, Tillis, Collins

[struth]

He dosen't care. He want's illegals protected, and Citizen business owners jailed....

pknopp wants to exploit illegals for cheap labor

He’s pissed trump busted one of his party’s big donors for doing just that

Pot farm raided by immigration agents has open child labor complaint, state says

State cannabis agency says it is investigating a child labor complaint about Glass House that was filed in May.

www.latimes.com

 

[OODA_Loop]

I have zero desire to post anything to you as you just ignore it.

Because you cant. If you could shove it in my face you would gleefully.

 

[berg80]

Then you agree that Trump doesn't have to include you losers into anything....Good.

My post showed your assertion to be a lie. Got it?

 

[OODA_Loop]

Translation, please?

Ill write in green crayon for you

Would rather vote for and live under Trump than under your version of governance.

 

[j-mac]

Read my response in context to what I replied to.



What a stupid question.




That can be. But again, we do nothing about the felony on the other side of the equation. In the employee's case we deport them. They turn around and come back to their waiting job.

The statute has been explained to you many times...I think it depends on a case by case basis...

For instance, you can have one employer that has his business raided, and it's the first time he's been found in violation of the statute so he gets a relatively light judgement, maybe a fine, or whatever...Whereas, another may be a serial offender of hiring illegals and has his business closed, and he's on the hook...

Now, you seem to want no leniency, or prudence of consideration be given to the employer, but on the other hand you're painting the illegal alien as a hard worker, that "shows up for work everyday" implying that nothing should happen to them...

So, why are you supporting illegals over Americans?

 

[berg80]

It's real simple....Show yourself condemning the statement of Pelosi, at the time she said it....

AI Overview

The quote often attributed to Nancy Pelosi as, "We have to pass the bill so we can see what's in it," is slightly misphrased. Her actual statement in March 2010, while discussing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), was: "We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it – away from the fog of the controversy". The phrase was widely circulated by critics and used as a political talking point to suggest a lack of transparency in the legislative process.

Imagine my surprise that you took her mischaracterized quote out of context.

away from the fog of the controversy".

IOW, absent the lies about the ACA being told by Repubs. Like Grassley claiming there were death panels.

 

[j-mac]

My post showed your assertion to be a lie. Got it?

No, you people did the same things to Republicans when y'all were in charge, and don't like it when you have to live under it...

 

[OODA_Loop]

AI Overview

The quote often attributed to Nancy Pelosi as, "We have to pass the bill so we can see what's in it," is slightly misphrased. Her actual statement in March 2010, while discussing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), was: "We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it – away from the fog of the controversy". The phrase was widely circulated by critics and used as a political talking point to suggest a lack of transparency in the legislative process.

Imagine my surprise that you took her mischaracterized quote out of context.

Its not mischaracterized.

Every bill has some fog of controversy......so we just pass laws and once its law you know what it is and cant do anything about it.

The controversy is the process.

 

[pknopp]

The statute has been explained to you many times...I think it depends on a case by case basis...

I'm not really interested in what you think.

For instance, you can have one employer that has his business raided, and it's the first time he's been found in violation of the statute so he gets a relatively light judgement, maybe a fine, or whatever...Whereas, another may be a serial offender of hiring illegals and has his business closed, and he's on the hook...

But that doesn't happen.

Now, you seem to want no leniency, or prudence of consideration be given to the employer, but on the other hand you're painting the illegal alien as a hard worker, that "shows up for work everyday" implying that nothing should happen to them...

So, why are you supporting illegals over Americans?

All you can do is spin.

 

[j-mac]

AI Overview

The quote often attributed to Nancy Pelosi as, "We have to pass the bill so we can see what's in it," is slightly misphrased. Her actual statement in March 2010, while discussing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), was: "We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it – away from the fog of the controversy". The phrase was widely circulated by critics and used as a political talking point to suggest a lack of transparency in the legislative process.

Imagine my surprise that you took her mischaracterized quote out of context.

Oh bullshit...AI is shit....I was arguing what Democrats were doing at the time....And it was atrocious....Now you don't like it...Well too ******* bad...Y'all lost and have no power, no credibility, and no morals or ethics so get bent.

 

[berg80]

Its not mischaracterized.

Every bill has some fog of controversy......so we just pass laws and once its law you know what it is and cant do anything about it.

The controversy is the process.

Absolutely mischaracterized if for no other reason than the quote attributed to her is often repeated in incomplete form.

 

[22lcidw]

Yes.



They still come to work everyday and you left out the context of my reply. Someone making excuses for the employer and the reason they are not busted.




We need a pattern of doing so. What sets me off is busting those who commit a misdemeanor but give a free pass to those who commit the felony.

We can then get many of the 41 million on SNAP to come to work every day as we get remove illegals.

 

[berg80]

.I was arguing what Democrats were doing at the time

Yes, you were. An assertion I showed to be horseshit.

 

[j-mac]

I'm not really interested in what you think.

You must be, you keep responding...

But that doesn't happen.

How would you know?

All you can do is spin.

And all you do is refuse to answer honestly when pressed....

 

[j-mac]

Yes, you were. An assertion I showed to be horseshit.

No, you didn't.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Absolutely mischaracterized if for no other reason than the quote attributed to her is often repeated in incomplete form.

Like Trump quotes at the J6 rally ?

 

[j-mac]

Absolutely mischaracterized if for no other reason than the quote attributed to her is often repeated in incomplete form.

And you would NEVER pull anything out of context, right?

 

[OODA_Loop]

And you would NEVER pull anything out of context, right?

Except Pelosi's quote is not out of context.....the omitted part is a qualifier to first part.

 

[j-mac]

Except Pelosi's quote is not out of context.....the omitted part is a qualifier to first part.

These are two of the biggest dishonest players in this board.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

You okay with this?

WASHINGTON — Lawmakers from both parties criticized the Trump administration after Democrats were not invited to a briefing Wednesday on U.S. military strikes on alleged drug-carrying boats.

Sen. Mark Warner, of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, told reporters at a news conference in the Capitol on Thursday that the partisan briefing was a "new low" for the administration.

If they have Intel on these cartels....yeah blow them up. I've seen what drugs do to people. To hell with these drug cartels. To hell with them.