Multiculturalism and Sharia

[PoliticalChic]

Funny how conservatives' zeal for 'religious freedom' dims when the topic is Islam.

Try to be honest.....are you lying or are you actually unable to understand the issue raised by the thread?

His point is correct. Their faith threatens yours, and you don't like that one bit.

You have burnished your credentials as a lying sack of sewage.

Wear the accolade proudly.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

That identifies you as a lying sack of sewage.

No, it means I'm being realistic. Either they will bend and start to ignore their faith like the Christians do, or they will take the country over and slaughter those who either don't convert or are willing to live under God's Highest Law, Sharia. Choose one.

This is a political issue....not one of religion.

It is the question of whether sharia is compatible with a nation that claims that the Constitution is the law of the land.

Parts of it are. It lines up about as well as the Bible does, actually better I would say. Islam has a very long history of jurisprudence.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Try to be honest.....are you lying or are you actually unable to understand the issue raised by the thread?

His point is correct. Their faith threatens yours, and you don't like that one bit.

You have burnished your credentials as a lying sack of sewage.

Wear the accolade proudly.

And you're not a very bright little girl. I wouldn't go casting too many stones kiddo.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Since America can't be taken over by Christian law, it seems even more implausible that America will ever be taken over by Islamic law, so this discussion is ultimately pointless.

Just like most here.

 

[Unkotare]

Muslims should all be deported. End of problem.

You should STFU. End of problem.

 

[Foxfyre]

You'll gonna have to learn to get along. Either that or slaughter each other trying to prove who has the right god,

Let's try to remain clear about the issue under discussion.

It is not strangers, ore different folks or different religions.

It is the question of whether sharia is compatible with a nation that claims that the Constitution is the law of the land.

Now....restate your post with that understanding in mind.

Changes nothing.

No, it changes everything. The Constitution is based on the concept that freedom allows each to believe in and worship whatever God and/or require allegiance to no god, and the federal government will have no say in that. Sharia Law requires government to force all to obey the dictates of Allah no matter what God they worship.

Obviously these two things cannot be in any way compatible.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Let's try to remain clear about the issue under discussion.

It is not strangers, ore different folks or different religions.

It is the question of whether sharia is compatible with a nation that claims that the Constitution is the law of the land.

Now....restate your post with that understanding in mind.

Changes nothing.

No, it changes everything. The Constitution is based on the concept that freedom allows each to believe in and worship whatever God and/or require allegiance to no god, and the federal government will have no say in that. Sharia Law requires government to force all to obey the dictates of Allah no matter what God they worship.

Obviously these two things cannot be in any way compatible.

What it doesn't change is the fact that one will win, or both will compromise. Christianity isn't compatible either, we've just made it so.

 

[NYcarbineer]

That identifies you as a lying sack of sewage.

No, it means I'm being realistic. Either they will bend and start to ignore their faith like the Christians do, or they will take the country over and slaughter those who either don't convert or are willing to live under God's Highest Law, Sharia. Choose one.

This is a political issue....not one of religion.

It is the question of whether sharia is compatible with a nation that claims that the Constitution is the law of the land.

Conservatives of a certain sort, quite prevalent, claim that the 10th amendment protects a state's right to do a wide array of things,

why wouldn't imposing Sharia law as a state's government be one of them? If of course enough people in the state wanted it...

 

[NYcarbineer]

Funny how conservatives' zeal for 'religious freedom' dims when the topic is Islam.

Try to be honest.....are you lying or are you actually unable to understand the issue raised by the thread?

Did you bring up a Muslim's dispute about his beard length because you support him or those who made the beard restriction?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Let's try to remain clear about the issue under discussion.

It is not strangers, ore different folks or different religions.

It is the question of whether sharia is compatible with a nation that claims that the Constitution is the law of the land.

Now....restate your post with that understanding in mind.

Changes nothing.

No, it changes everything. The Constitution is based on the concept that freedom allows each to believe in and worship whatever God and/or require allegiance to no god, and the federal government will have no say in that. Sharia Law requires government to force all to obey the dictates of Allah no matter what God they worship.

Obviously these two things cannot be in any way compatible.

Tell that to all your pals who said the government cannot legally require the Christian businesses to serve the gays.

 

[Foxfyre]

Changes nothing.

No, it changes everything. The Constitution is based on the concept that freedom allows each to believe in and worship whatever God and/or require allegiance to no god, and the federal government will have no say in that. Sharia Law requires government to force all to obey the dictates of Allah no matter what God they worship.

Obviously these two things cannot be in any way compatible.

What it doesn't change is the fact that one will win, or both will compromise. Christianity isn't compatible either, we've just made it so.

Christianity has no quarrel with the Constitution whatsoever. The vast majority of the Founders and those who signed the Constitution were in fact Christians, and yet they were determined that Christianity not be made the official religion of the land and no pope or monarch or any other central government would have any power to dictate what any person must believe in anything. That was their definition of liberty.

Sharia Law would definitely include giving government the power to dictate the religious rules the people are required to live by and to inhibit or squelch all other beliefs.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No, it changes everything. The Constitution is based on the concept that freedom allows each to believe in and worship whatever God and/or require allegiance to no god, and the federal government will have no say in that. Sharia Law requires government to force all to obey the dictates of Allah no matter what God they worship.

Obviously these two things cannot be in any way compatible.

What it doesn't change is the fact that one will win, or both will compromise. Christianity isn't compatible either, we've just made it so.

Christianity has no quarrel with the Constitution whatsoever. The vast majority of the Founders and those who signed the Constitution were in fact Christians, and yet they were determined that Christianity not be made the official religion of the land and no pope or monarch or any other central government would have any power to dictate what any person must believe in anything. That was their definition of liberty.

Sharia Law would definitely include giving government the power to dictate the religious rules the people are required to live by and to inhibit or squelch all other beliefs.

Christianity has Freedom of Religion? Of Speech? Of Action? Of Privacy and Sexual relations? It has voting? It has Public Service? It has Fair and Speedy trials? Those are Enlightenment Ideals. Christianity doesn't have a one of them. Christianity has God and the submission to God, and Hell for those who reject Him. Just like Democracy and Capitalism, Christianity is incompatible and unrelated.

When the Catholic Church was running Europe, that was Christianity as a Government. Sharia would be very close to the same.

 

[Unkotare]

Christianity isn't compatible either...

Of course it is.

 

[longknife]

Let's try to remain clear about the issue under discussion.

It is not strangers, ore different folks or different religions.

It is the question of whether sharia is compatible with a nation that claims that the Constitution is the law of the land.

Now....restate your post with that understanding in mind.

Changes nothing.

No, it changes everything. The Constitution is based on the concept that freedom allows each to believe in and worship whatever God and/or require allegiance to no god, and the federal government will have no say in that. Sharia Law requires government to force all to obey the dictates of Allah no matter what God they worship.

Obviously these two things cannot be in any way compatible.

An awesome response. Thanks.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Christianity isn't compatible either...

Of course it is.

No, it's isn't, we're just used to it here. There is no God and Country in Christianity, just God. There's no God and Country in Islam either, just God, and the Submission to Him.

 

[Unkotare]

What it doesn't change is the fact that one will win, or both will compromise. Christianity isn't compatible either, we've just made it so.

Christianity has no quarrel with the Constitution whatsoever. The vast majority of the Founders and those who signed the Constitution were in fact Christians, and yet they were determined that Christianity not be made the official religion of the land and no pope or monarch or any other central government would have any power to dictate what any person must believe in anything. That was their definition of liberty.

Sharia Law would definitely include giving government the power to dictate the religious rules the people are required to live by and to inhibit or squelch all other beliefs.

Christianity has Freedom of Religion? Of Speech? Of Action? Of Privacy and Sexual relations? It has voting? It has Public Service? It has Fair and Speedy trials? Those are Enlightenment Ideals. Christianity doesn't have a one of them. Christianity has God and the submission to God, and Hell for those who reject Him. Just like Democracy and Capitalism, Christianity is incompatible and unrelated.

When the Catholic Church was running Europe, that was Christianity as a Government. Sharia would be very close to the same.

You clearly do not understand Christianity or its role in the history of Europe.

 

[Unkotare]

Christianity isn't compatible either...

Of course it is.

No, it's isn't, we're just used to it here. There is no God and Country in Christianity, just God. There's no God and Country in Islam either, just God, and the Submission to Him.

Steer clear of theology. You are even more ignorant of that subject than you are of Political Science.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Christianity has no quarrel with the Constitution whatsoever. The vast majority of the Founders and those who signed the Constitution were in fact Christians, and yet they were determined that Christianity not be made the official religion of the land and no pope or monarch or any other central government would have any power to dictate what any person must believe in anything. That was their definition of liberty.

Sharia Law would definitely include giving government the power to dictate the religious rules the people are required to live by and to inhibit or squelch all other beliefs.

Christianity has Freedom of Religion? Of Speech? Of Action? Of Privacy and Sexual relations? It has voting? It has Public Service? It has Fair and Speedy trials? Those are Enlightenment Ideals. Christianity doesn't have a one of them. Christianity has God and the submission to God, and Hell for those who reject Him. Just like Democracy and Capitalism, Christianity is incompatible and unrelated.

When the Catholic Church was running Europe, that was Christianity as a Government. Sharia would be very close to the same.

You clearly do not understand Christianity or its role in the history of Europe.

Oh but I do.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Of course it is.

No, it's isn't, we're just used to it here. There is no God and Country in Christianity, just God. There's no God and Country in Islam either, just God, and the Submission to Him.

Steer clear of theology. You are even more ignorant of that subject than you are of Political Science.

You can say that as often as you like, it still won't make it true.

 

[Unkotare]

Christianity has Freedom of Religion? Of Speech? Of Action? Of Privacy and Sexual relations? It has voting? It has Public Service? It has Fair and Speedy trials? Those are Enlightenment Ideals. Christianity doesn't have a one of them. Christianity has God and the submission to God, and Hell for those who reject Him. Just like Democracy and Capitalism, Christianity is incompatible and unrelated.

When the Catholic Church was running Europe, that was Christianity as a Government. Sharia would be very close to the same.

You clearly do not understand Christianity or its role in the history of Europe.

Oh but I do.

Then you're doing a good job of keeping it a secret.