Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.
Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.
Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.
They won't read it for one, and what is left is ad hominem for those who exposed the truth and facts. That is literally all the Trump stooges on this forum have left. They have zero, and I do mean zero arguing points that can deliver any intelligent counter arguments.The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.
Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.
Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map
"The key question is how Robert Mueller and his team assessed the three elements 'common to most of the relevant statutes' relating to obstruction of justice: an obstructive act, a nexus between the act and an official proceeding, and corrupt intent.
"As Mueller describes, the special counsel’s office 'gathered evidence … relevant to the elements of those crimes and analyzed them within an elements framework—while refraining from reaching ultimate conclusions about whether crimes were committed,' because of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC)’s guidelines against the indictment of a sitting president.
"The below heat map is an effort to simplify Mueller’s analysis of the evidence in relation to the three common elements of the obstruction statutes.
"Instances of possibly obstructive conduct are identified by their section marking in Volume II of the report."
Captain America's claim that the OLC said indicting a sitting president is impermissible is countered by something turned up by the NY Times in 2017.Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:
Republicans insist on stupid. Okay! Good! You've been schooled about the rules, which has nothing to do with the NYT's article by the way, you've been schooled over the evidence, so "let stupid is as stupid does" for Republicans. It's at their peril, no one else's.Captain America's claim that the OLC said indicting a sitting president is impermissible is countered by something turned up by the NY Times in 2017.Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:
“It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president’s official duties,” the Starr office memo concludes. “In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.”
Can the President Be Indicted? A Long-Hidden Legal Memo Says Yes
When the NY Times reports this news, over two years ago now, why is Robert Mueller spreading his lie around and
we already know why sheep like you simply repeat whatever you are told.
Mueller could have indicted except for the fact he has nothing on which to indict. Wake up, clowns.
You're too lazy to read it yourself. You're a loser, not a winner.The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.
Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.
Not only is that a lie, but it's a stupid counter argument.It’s unravelling that Muller knew and knows his editorializing would spell trouble for him but his shot at Trump was too irresistible.
You're too lazy to read it yourself. You're a loser, not a winner.The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.
Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.
You're too lazy to read it yourself. You're a loser, not a winner.The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.
Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.
Come on I challenged you to back up your propaganda. You proved that’s just what your assertion is.
Captain America's claim that the OLC said indicting a sitting president is impermissible is countered by something turned up by the NY Times in 2017.Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:
“It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president’s official duties,” the Starr office memo concludes. “In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.”
Can the President Be Indicted? A Long-Hidden Legal Memo Says Yes
When the NY Times reports this news, over two years ago now, why is Robert Mueller spreading his lie around and
we already know why sheep like you simply repeat whatever you are told.
Mueller could have indicted except for the fact he has nothing on which to indict. Wake up, clowns.
The biggest reason Mueller didn't indict Trump was Trump's transformation from pro-choice Democrat to pro-life Republican just in time for the 2016 primaries. Republicans don't indict other Republicans, remember?When the NY Times reports this news, over two years ago now, why is Robert Mueller spreading his lie around and
we already know why sheep like you simply repeat whatever you are told.
Mueller could have indicted except for the fact he has nothing on which to indict. Wake up, clowns.
They won't read it for one, and what is left is ad hominem for those who exposed the truth and facts. That is literally all the Trump stooges on this forum have left. They have zero, and I do mean zero arguing points that can deliver any intelligent counter arguments.The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.
Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.
Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map
"The key question is how Robert Mueller and his team assessed the three elements 'common to most of the relevant statutes' relating to obstruction of justice: an obstructive act, a nexus between the act and an official proceeding, and corrupt intent.
"As Mueller describes, the special counsel’s office 'gathered evidence … relevant to the elements of those crimes and analyzed them within an elements framework—while refraining from reaching ultimate conclusions about whether crimes were committed,' because of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC)’s guidelines against the indictment of a sitting president.
"The below heat map is an effort to simplify Mueller’s analysis of the evidence in relation to the three common elements of the obstruction statutes.
"Instances of possibly obstructive conduct are identified by their section marking in Volume II of the report."
And after last night of watching Maddow, we now have brand new evidence of slam dunk conspiracy by the campaign to collude with Ukraine to help Trump get elected by writing damaging information about Clinton tying her to international terrorism. And they did it with Ukraine. And Flynn got paid to report that information. That is an agreement to commit a conspiracy with a foreign government against a political opponent. DOJ surprises with omissions in response to Flynn document order
According to some Democrats, there are many congressional Republicans who have not read the Mueller Report. All they are reading is Trump's solid numbers among his base. Any Republican who goes against Trump faces a primary opponent in his/her next campaign. They have no idea what's coming since there are an almost infinite supply of legitimate reasons to remove Trump from office and send him to prison for the rest of his useless life.They won't read it for one, and what is left is ad hominem for those who exposed the truth and facts. That is literally all the Trump stooges on this forum have left. They have zero, and I do mean zero arguing points that can deliver any intelligent counter arguments.
Yup. Trump is declared "not innocent," and the Democrat mob in the US House is told to have at him.Mueller had no evidence of obstruction so he could not say that Trump obstructed anything he just said he didn’t have the evidence to say he did not obstruct which is bullshit