More than 99.9% of peer reviewed studies show that humans are the primary cause of global warming

[ding]

Please tell me how I am destroying people's live, churchlady. Please please please

 

[CrusaderFrank]

More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change | Cornell Chronicle

More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.

news.cornell.edu

AND

Radware Bot Manager Captcha

Abstract​

While controls over the Earth's climate system have undergone rigorous hypothesis-testing since the 1800s, questions over the scientific consensus of the role of human activities in modern climate change continue to arise in public settings. We update previous efforts to quantify the scientific consensus on climate change by searching the recent literature for papers sceptical of anthropogenic-caused global warming. From a dataset of 88125 climate-related papers published since 2012, when this question was last addressed comprehensively, we examine a randomized subset of 3000 such publications. We also use a second sample-weighted approach that was specifically biased with keywords to help identify any sceptical peer-reviewed papers in the whole dataset. We identify four sceptical papers out of the sub-set of 3000, as evidenced by abstracts that were rated as implicitly or explicitly sceptical of human-caused global warming. In our sample utilizing pre-identified sceptical keywords we found 28 papers that were implicitly or explicitly sceptical. We conclude with high statistical confidence that the scientific consensus on human-caused contemporary climate change—expressed as a proportion of the total publications—exceeds 99% in the peer reviewed scientific literature.

---

The consensus means something. For all practical purposes, there is no longer ANY scientific debate on the primary cause of global warming.

“If everybody is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking.” ― George S. Patton

Yeah, that's the whole point to the AGWCult, George

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Please tell me how I am destroying people's live, churchlady. Please please please

You stole Greta's childhood and Dylan Mulvaney's womanhood!

 

[otto105]

Please tell me how I am destroying people's live, churchlady. Please please please

Dude, I already asked you to tell your political story to your offspring and get their responses.

Just stop being a Vagisal fuckup already.

 

[otto105]

You stole Greta's childhood and Dylan Mulvaney's womanhood!

Dude, WTF

Nobody did that,

And why does your old white piece of shit think that is an argument?

Geezsus

 

[Orangecat]

Tell us again how the 2020 election was stolen from your ducked in detail.

Coherent English, please.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Dude, WTF

Nobody did that,

And why does your old white piece of shit think that is an argument?

Geezsus

Greta said so herself!

 

[otto105]

Greta said so herself!

Sure, post it.

All of it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Sure, post it.

All of it.

"You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words, yet I'm one of the lucky ones. People are suffering, people are dying, entire ecosystems are collapsing,"

 

[ding]

Dude, I already asked you to tell your political story to your offspring and get their responses.

Just stop being a Vagisal fuckup already.

I'm not political, 5C. You are.

Now go preach to the new moral majority, ya fucking church lady.

 

[otto105]

I'm not political, 5C. You are.

Now go preach to the new moral majority, ya fucking church lady.

So, how does 2023 rank in terms of global warming?

 

[ding]

So, how does 2023 rank in terms of global warming?

Just like any other year in an interglacial period.

 

[otto105]

Just like any other year in an interglacial period.

Sure, nothing to see here.

MSN

 

[Crick]

So, how does 2023 rank in terms of global warming?

There is a VERY good chance it will be the hottest year in human history.

 

[Lastamender]

More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change | Cornell Chronicle

More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.

news.cornell.edu

AND

Radware Bot Manager Captcha

Abstract​

While controls over the Earth's climate system have undergone rigorous hypothesis-testing since the 1800s, questions over the scientific consensus of the role of human activities in modern climate change continue to arise in public settings. We update previous efforts to quantify the scientific consensus on climate change by searching the recent literature for papers sceptical of anthropogenic-caused global warming. From a dataset of 88125 climate-related papers published since 2012, when this question was last addressed comprehensively, we examine a randomized subset of 3000 such publications. We also use a second sample-weighted approach that was specifically biased with keywords to help identify any sceptical peer-reviewed papers in the whole dataset. We identify four sceptical papers out of the sub-set of 3000, as evidenced by abstracts that were rated as implicitly or explicitly sceptical of human-caused global warming. In our sample utilizing pre-identified sceptical keywords we found 28 papers that were implicitly or explicitly sceptical. We conclude with high statistical confidence that the scientific consensus on human-caused contemporary climate change—expressed as a proportion of the total publications—exceeds 99% in the peer reviewed scientific literature.

---

The consensus means something. For all practical purposes, there is no longer ANY scientific debate on the primary cause of global warming.

 

[ding]

There is a VERY good chance it will be the hottest year in human history.

Interglacial periods are warm periods.

 

[otto105]

Interglacial periods are warm periods.

Tell that to the billions of crabs lost in Alaska.

 

[toobfreak]

More than 99.9% of peer reviewed studies show that humans are the primary cause of global warming​

SO F*#@CKING WHAT? Are you saying that an anthropomorphic influence on the climate is any different from one emanating directly from the crust? Does it matter whether gases in the atmosphere are from sea bed emanations, tundra thawing, volcanism, cow farts, industry, or space asteroids?



The effect is all the same. These are all NATURAL and expected processes which occur given the time. And the Earth has shown that every occurrence and change over the eons has not only been recovered from and adapted to every time, but in fact was actually BENEFICIAL to life.

Without the Permian Extinction and other events, WE WOULD NOT BE HERE TODAY. For all you know, the present warming of the Earth may not only be necessary, but very beneficial in both staving off the next ice age permitting life to evolve on to something far better for us or than us!

In every instance that man has interfered with nature thinking himself wiser and knowing better, we have been proven wrong and the results disastrous.

 

[Sunsettommy]

There is a VERY good chance it will be the hottest year in human history.

Human history goes back at least 300,000 years and it was warmer early in the interglacial and much warmer in the previous interglacial period.

Your lies have been getting stupider and stupider.

 

[toobfreak]

Human history goes back at least 300,000 years

Sounds about right, Tommy! That is about when, AFAWCT, organized speech and communal language as we know it began to appear in the historical record.