so how many votes did russian activity change? which states did they occur in? which counties? which cities? How many of those votes were offset by social media posts that supported hillary?
If the russians were doing anything, they were trying to divide us and get us yelling at each other, in that they succeeded.
next question: why would russia perfer Trump who they could not control over hillary who they had tons of data to use to blackmail her into doing whatever they wanted? Try to give a logical answer.
so how many votes did russian activity change? which states did they occur in? which counties? which cities? How many of those votes were offset by social media posts that supported hillary?
A better question would be how many voters in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania were influenced by the Russian hacking that Trump had publicly called for:
How Russia Helped Swing the Election for Trump
"Before the hearings, Facebook’s chairman and C.E.O.,
Mark Zuckerberg, had maintained that the amount of Russian content that had been disseminated on social media was too small to matter.
"But evidence presented to the Senate committee revealed that material generated by the Kremlin had reached
a hundred and twenty-six million American Facebook users, leading Senator Dianne Feinstein to call the cyberattack 'cataclysmic.'"
Care to explain what exactly did Russians hacked that influenced voters to vote for Trump?
I'm sure that people in those states voting for Trump ave nothing to do with Hillary not campaigning in Wisconsin at all, showing up in Michigan once, and in Pennsylvania Hillary had 18 rallies from which 8 were in Philadelphia and 4 in Pittsburgh where she didn't even have to campaign, while Trump had 15 rallies in 14 different cities.
Most people who voted for Trump were his supporters before they had any knowledge of Russian "hacking" and influence. By the way, how many Americans really care about what Russians have to say?
Care to explain what exactly did Russians hacked that influenced voters to vote for Trump?
"'Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.'183
"The '30,000 emails' were apparently a reference to emails described in media accounts as having been stored on a personal server that candidate Clinton had used while serving as Secretary of State.
"Within approximately five hours of Trump’s statement, GRU officers targeted for the first time Clinton’s personal office.
"After candidate Trump’s remarks, Unit 26165 created and sent malicious links targeting 15 email accounts at the domain ■■■■■■■■■ including an email account belonging to Clinton aide ■■■■■■■■■
"The investigation did not find evidence of earlier GRU attempts to compromise accounts hosted on this domain. It is unclear how the GRU was able to identify these email accounts, which were not public."
Read the Mueller Report: Searchable Document and Index (Vol. I, P. 49)
2016 saw large numbers of voters who did not want to vote for either major party candidate. Trump's margin of victory was about 80,000 votes in three key swing states. Many of those voters made last minute decisions about which candidate to back. Since all Russian efforts were made in support of Trump, it's likely any influence they had was to his benefit.
Mueller said no collusion and no obstruction.
You didn't know that????
The only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion with the Kremlin......
.......are Democrats.
Let's prove it together:
1. There is zero evidence that of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
There are scads of evidence of collusion between the media and the DNC, and there is this:
The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.
The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.
2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"
52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™
Here's why:
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The first Republican President
And this:
3. "Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President
Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife,
Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
And
4. "Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance
And
5. "EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank"
EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank
6. News anchor highlights all of the known links to Russia
-------------------------------------------------------------
Democrat collusion???
7. "Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador’s House
Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) used a personal foundation to pay for a dinner she attended at Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak's Washington, D.C., residence. The senator had failed to disclose her role in the foundation until earlier this month.
McCaskill came under fire this March after she told the
Washington Post she never had a "
call or meeting" with Kislyak even though she had publicly announced both a
call and
meeting with him. This week, CNN
reportedthat McCaskill also attended a black-tie reception at Kislyak's D.C. residence in November 2015.
McCaskill's attendance at the dinner was accompanied by an $873 payment to the American-Russian Cultural Cooperation Foundation, where Kislyak serves on its
board of directors as honorary chairman."
Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador's House
8. Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work
...the powerful Washington lobbying firm run by Clinton ally Tony Podesta filed a document admitting its work for the pro-Russia European Centre for a Modern Ukraine may have principally benefited a foreign government. New
disclosures revealed dozens of previously unreported interactions the firm made with influential government offices, including Hillary Clinton's State Department and the office of former Vice President Joe Biden, while lobbying on behalf of the center. Embattled ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort failed to disclose his extensive lobbying efforts on behalf of the center at the time as well.
How do you say 'whoops' in Russian? Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work
9. And we now know.....
..
a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.
b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.
c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/
d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.
e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.
10. Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional investigation into President Trump's alleged ties to Russia, had extensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages obtained exclusively by Fox News.
Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop -- at least initially. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages.
Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele
11. Adam Schiff is the head Democrat on the Intelligence Committee
Remember....if not for double standards, the Democrats would have no standards at all....
The Dems are claiming that the Trump folks colluded with a foreign power to collect damaging material about a political adversary....
And remember: to know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.
Schiff orchestrated a plan to get naked and 'kompromat' pictures of Trump, from the Ukrainians!
The problem is.....the 'Ukrainians' who contacted him were comedians who exposed Schiff and the Democrats for what they are.
"Adam Schiff sent his staff to try and collect 'classified materials for the FBI' after Russian pranksters told him Putin has NAKED blackmail pictures of Trump
Adam Schiff spoofed with Russian claim of nude Trump pic | Daily Mail Online
12.“
Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional
investigation into President Trump's alleged ties to Russia, had xtensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages…
From Democrat Warner:
"We have so much to discuss u need to be careful but we can help our country," Warner texted the lobbyist, Adam Waldman, on March 22, 2017.
"I'm in," Waldman,
whose firm has ties to Hillary Clinton, texted back to Warner.
Secrecy seemed very important to Warner …
"Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop -- at least initially. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that
he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages.”
Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele
“ Secrecy seemed very important to Warner …”
"...would rather not have a paper trail...."
“,,,an honest person would ask themselves
how’d they react if that was a text message between Donald Trump, Jr., and some fixer paid for by Sergei Lavrov in which he sought a meeting with someone and didn’t want a paper trail.”
Why Did Mark Warner Try to Secretly Meet With Trump Dossier Author and a Blacklisted Russian Oligarch?
13. The ONLY ones with any collusion with Russia are Democrats.
The Democrats colluded, collaborated, conspired with Moscow, the Kremlin, Putin.....to sink the Trump candidacy.
And the Kremlin was happy to do so: they wanted the candidate that they had a history of bribing, to be President.
The only group that we know has colluded with, conspired with, contracted with, been bribed by, paid the Russians, the Kremlin, Moscow....
...are Democrats.
14. While Hillary Clinton sat on the Senate Armed Services Committee she pressured Kazakhstan to build up pal Frank Giustra’s uranium company, Uranium One.
Then, as Sec’y of State, presiding over The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) she suddenly reversed her previous opposition to the Russian State Nuclear Agency controlling 20% of the uranium extraction in the United States.
“Clinton’s CFIUS committee approved a Russian takeover of US uranium assets at the same time that the Russian company’s chairman was giving substantial sums of money to Clinton’s foundation. There is no evidence that Clinton ever divulged this blatant, if not potentially corrupt, conflict of interest.” Jarrett, “The Russia Hoax,” p. 70-71
15. BTW….Russia itself handed some $2.6 million directly to the Clinton’s foundation, at the same time that Hillary Clinton was rubber-stamping the Uranium One deal that authorized the Russian State Nuclear Agency to gain control of some 20% of the uranium extracted in the United States.
“A Canadian company called Salida Capital delivered more than $2.6 million to the Clinton Foundation. It just so happens that a company by the same name was listed by Rosatom in its annual report as being wholly owned by the Russian company.” Jarrett, “The Russia Hoax,” p. 72
And….just before Hillary’s State Department committee, The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), approved the Uranium One deal, Bill was paid $500,000 by a Russian financial institution, Renaissance Capital, to deliver a short speech in Moscow. Ibid.
Nothing….not even America’s well being, can stand in the way of the Clinton’s enrichment.
Now don't forget.....you're m
entally qualified for handicapped parking.
