More republican bullshit: regulations have a very minimal effect on jobs

[Billy000]

In 2010, 0.3 percent of the people who lost their jobs in layoffs were let go because of “government regulations/intervention.” By comparison, 25 percent were laid off because of a drop in business demand.

Does government regulation really kill jobs? Economists say overall effect minimal. - The Washington Post

The more facts we learn, the more we realize just how much bullshit republicanism is.

 

[Avatar4321]

So you think adding millions in costs to businesses in terms of time and labor in order to follow regulation that you keep adding and changing and making more burdensom, has minimal effects on businesses?

Can you imagine how much more productive we could be in society if we didn't have to spend so much time and money working to meet government regulation and could instead spend that time serving customers, clients, and exploring new ideas and the world in general?

It's time the American people begin working less for the government and more for themselves and their families.

 

[bripat9643]

In 2010, 0.3 percent of the people who lost their jobs in layoffs were let go because of “government regulations/intervention.” By comparison, 25 percent were laid off because of a drop in business demand.

Does government regulation really kill jobs? Economists say overall effect minimal. - The Washington Post

The more facts we learn, the more we realize just how much bullshit republicanism is.

You mean a government paid toady says the effect is "minimal." Furthermore, the main objection to government regulations is that they increase cost. After the EPA implements their new rules on coal, the cost of electricity is going to skyrocket.

 

[Billy000]

So you think adding millions in costs to businesses in terms of time and labor in order to follow regulation that you keep adding and changing and making more burdensom, has minimal effects on businesses?

Can you imagine how much more productive we could be in society if we didn't have to spend so much time and money working to meet government regulation and could instead spend that time serving customers, clients, and exploring new ideas and the world in general?

It's time the American people begin working less for the government and more for themselves and their families.

The facts are what they are.

 

[bripat9643]

So you think adding millions in costs to businesses in terms of time and labor in order to follow regulation that you keep adding and changing and making more burdensom, has minimal effects on businesses?

Can you imagine how much more productive we could be in society if we didn't have to spend so much time and money working to meet government regulation and could instead spend that time serving customers, clients, and exploring new ideas and the world in general?

It's time the American people begin working less for the government and more for themselves and their families.

The facts are what they are.

You haven't posted any facts, only propaganda.

 

[Indeependent]

The regulation for an employee to wash his/her hands after using the toilet bankrupted thousands of businesses.

 

[Billy000]

In 2010, 0.3 percent of the people who lost their jobs in layoffs were let go because of “government regulations/intervention.” By comparison, 25 percent were laid off because of a drop in business demand.

Does government regulation really kill jobs? Economists say overall effect minimal. - The Washington Post

The more facts we learn, the more we realize just how much bullshit republicanism is.

You mean a government paid toady says the effect is "minimal." Furthermore, the main objection to government regulations is that they increase cost. After the EPA implements their new rules on coal, the cost of electricity is going to skyrocket.

Regulations are necessary. Mitt Romney himself even said they are. He didn't say that in his liberal days mind you. This was durin the primaries.

 

[TemplarKormac]

So why did Reagan's deregulation create 11 million jobs? How come more regulation doesn't kill jobs? Your logic is flawed, Billy!

 

[Billy000]

So you think adding millions in costs to businesses in terms of time and labor in order to follow regulation that you keep adding and changing and making more burdensom, has minimal effects on businesses?

Can you imagine how much more productive we could be in society if we didn't have to spend so much time and money working to meet government regulation and could instead spend that time serving customers, clients, and exploring new ideas and the world in general?

It's time the American people begin working less for the government and more for themselves and their families.

The facts are what they are.

You haven't posted any facts, only propaganda.

Prove they aren't facts. Go ahead. I'll wait.

 

[Billy000]

So why did Reagan's deregulation create 11 million jobs? How come more regulation doesn't kill jobs? Your logic is flawed, Billy!

Prove to me deregulation has a significant effect on job creation. You're an idiot if you think it creates 11 million jobs.

 

[chikenwing]

So you think adding millions in costs to businesses in terms of time and labor in order to follow regulation that you keep adding and changing and making more burdensom, has minimal effects on businesses?

Can you imagine how much more productive we could be in society if we didn't have to spend so much time and money working to meet government regulation and could instead spend that time serving customers, clients, and exploring new ideas and the world in general?

It's time the American people begin working less for the government and more for themselves and their families.

The facts are what they are.

So you have no problems explaining those facts to the people that DID lose their jobs right??

 

[Billy000]

So you think adding millions in costs to businesses in terms of time and labor in order to follow regulation that you keep adding and changing and making more burdensom, has minimal effects on businesses?

Can you imagine how much more productive we could be in society if we didn't have to spend so much time and money working to meet government regulation and could instead spend that time serving customers, clients, and exploring new ideas and the world in general?

It's time the American people begin working less for the government and more for themselves and their families.

The facts are what they are.

So you have no problems explaining those facts to the people that DID lose their jobs right??

Again, regulations are necessary.

 

[Indeependent]

The regulation for an employer to provide a minimal amount of light for the workspace of their employees bankrupted thousands of businesses.

 

[bripat9643]

Does government regulation really kill jobs? Economists say overall effect minimal. - The Washington Post

The more facts we learn, the more we realize just how much bullshit republicanism is.

You mean a government paid toady says the effect is "minimal." Furthermore, the main objection to government regulations is that they increase cost. After the EPA implements their new rules on coal, the cost of electricity is going to skyrocket.

Regulations are necessary. Mitt Romney himself even said they are. He didn't say that in his liberal days mind you. This was durin the primaries.

Well if Mitt Romney says it's true, then it must be true!

That must be what passes for logic among libturds.

Romney has always been a liberal Republican. He always will be.

 

[Indeependent]

So why did Reagan's deregulation create 11 million jobs? How come more regulation doesn't kill jobs? Your logic is flawed, Billy!

Remember the Oil Embargo?
Carter deregulated over 70 Industries and the economy still took a VERY long time to recover.
Then Senior Bush flushed it right down the toilet again.

 

[bripat9643]

The facts are what they are.

So you have no problems explaining those facts to the people that DID lose their jobs right??

Again, regulations are necessary.

No they aren't.

 

[edthecynic]

So why did Reagan's deregulation create 11 million jobs? How come more regulation doesn't kill jobs? Your logic is flawed, Billy!

It was St Ronnie's Keynesian military spending that created jobs.

 

[Indeependent]

The regulation for a business owner to provide a clean walking space for employees and customers bankrupted thousands of businesses.

 

[bripat9643]

So why did Reagan's deregulation create 11 million jobs? How come more regulation doesn't kill jobs? Your logic is flawed, Billy!

Remember the Oil Embargo?
Carter deregulated over 70 Industries and the economy still took a VERY long time to recover.
Then Senior Bush flushed it right down the toilet again.

One thing Carter didn't deregulate was government controls on the price of domestic oil, and the federal government took over control of allocating gasoline supplies.

What Carter undid with one hand, he redid in spades with the other.

When Reagan deregulated the price of oil it went to under $10/bbl. The economy boomed as a result.

 

[bripat9643]

The regulation for a business owner to provide a clean walking space for employees and customers bankrupted thousands of businesses.

There is no such regulation, numskull.