ThereÂ’s nothing racist about advocating for a particular culture to run government. Blacks are a minority and, for the most part, hold a collectivist group think culture. Whites, for the most part, are an individualist culture, or perhaps, familial culture. Black culture never enjoyed an enlightenment and had it forced upon them, and thus, are still unfamiliar with the rights of the individual and why they are unalienable. Likewise, Jim Crow set them up perfectly for political exploitation at the behest of socialist, communist, and Marxist groups looking for the poor and downtrodden to demand that the efforts of others benefit them. Indeed, W.E.B. Du Bois was a communist (He joined the Communist Party USA) and a Stalinist sympathizer. The NAACP was also founded by a socialist. The reason why liberals call conservatives racists is because they are anti-socialists, meaning, not congruent with the socialist aims of blacks who want more redistribution of wealth. This is also why over 92% of black voters vote democrat. Indeed, there is nothing racist about it. It has everything to do with socialist culture. Democrats know this well and they also know that the more independant whites become less of a majority the higher the chance to bring socialism to the United States. With that said, immigration comes to mind. Why else would unions join forces with amnesty advocates even though it is a direct threat to their labor?