More facts: Obama nixed rescue in favor of trade

Quantum Windbag

Gold Member
May 9, 2010
58,308
5,099
245
Obama must have really pissed off someone with his "Honorable and distinguished service" lie.

The Obama administration passed up multiple opportunities to rescue Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl because the president was dead-set on finding a reason to begin emptying Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, according to a Pentagon official.
'JSOC went to the White House with several specific rescue-op scenarios,' the official with knowledge of interagency negotiations underway since at least November 2013 told MailOnline, referring to the Joint Special Operations Command. 'But no one ever got traction.'
'What we learned along the way was that the president wanted a diplomatic scenario that would establish a precedent for repatriating detainees from Gitmo,' he said.


Obama ignored chances to rescue Bergdahl 'because he WANTED terror trade' | Mail Online
 
Obama must have really pissed off someone with his "Honorable and distinguished service" lie.

The Obama administration passed up multiple opportunities to rescue Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl because the president was dead-set on finding a reason to begin emptying Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, according to a Pentagon official.
'JSOC went to the White House with several specific rescue-op scenarios,' the official with knowledge of interagency negotiations underway since at least November 2013 told MailOnline, referring to the Joint Special Operations Command. 'But no one ever got traction.'
'What we learned along the way was that the president wanted a diplomatic scenario that would establish a precedent for repatriating detainees from Gitmo,' he said.


Obama ignored chances to rescue Bergdahl 'because he WANTED terror trade' | Mail Online
As did military commanders, or so this report reads:

Military commanders, meanwhile, were unwilling to mount a dangerous rescue operation to save a presumed U.S. Army deserter....
 
If that's his preferred method of emptying Gitmo he will have to find more ways of kidnapping service members
 
Does even one nutter understand that we got something in return for the five prisoners? A year or two from now, we'll be releasing the rest of the detainees and get nothing in return.

Think.
 
Obama must have really pissed off someone with his "Honorable and distinguished service" lie.

The Obama administration passed up multiple opportunities to rescue Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl because the president was dead-set on finding a reason to begin emptying Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, according to a Pentagon official.
'JSOC went to the White House with several specific rescue-op scenarios,' the official with knowledge of interagency negotiations underway since at least November 2013 told MailOnline, referring to the Joint Special Operations Command. 'But no one ever got traction.'
'What we learned along the way was that the president wanted a diplomatic scenario that would establish a precedent for repatriating detainees from Gitmo,' he said.
Obama ignored chances to rescue Bergdahl 'because he WANTED terror trade' | Mail Online
As did military commanders, or so this report reads:

Military commanders, meanwhile, were unwilling to mount a dangerous rescue operation to save a presumed U.S. Army deserter....

They were unwilling to rescue a deserter, but offered the alternative anyway because, believe it or not, their job is to do what they are told. Ultimately, the decision is Obama's, and he favored a trade over a military solution.
 
Does even one nutter understand that we got something in return for the five prisoners? A year or two from now, we'll be releasing the rest of the detainees and get nothing in return.

Think.

I am, are you?

For instance, did you know that the military wanted to include the other hostages?

The deal to free Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in exchange for five Taliban detainees held by the U.S. military nixed a broader effort by the Department of Defense to include other U.S. citizens held by the Taliban and its allies, according to a top congressional aide.
The Department of Defense had a "broader goal" of including Caitlan Coleman of York , Pa., her baby who was born in captivity and her Canadian husband, Joshua Boyle, in a deal to free Bergdahl, said Joe Kasper, chief of staff to Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., who sits on the House Armed Services Committee.
Among Americans held captive is Warren Weinstein, a contractor from Rockville, Md., who was abducted in 2011 in Pakistan and is detained by al-Qaeda militants aligned with the Taliban.
"The DoD was looking at this in the whole scope of things, to deal with these people as well," Kasper told USA TODAY in an interview Thursday. "Instead of five for one, why not five for five?"

Pentagon effort to free more hostages with Bergdahl nixed

You should try taking your own advice, if it doesn't give you a migraine.
 
The Obama administration passed up multiple opportunities to rescue Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl because the president was dead-set on finding a reason to begin emptying Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, according to a Pentagon official.

And appropriately so.

The detentions are illegal, where the release of the five detainees was lawful in accordance with Article I, Section 9 of the US Constitution, whether an American serviceman was released or not.

What would be ideal is for more countries to agree to take all the detainees, bringing to an end the shameful Bush Era disaster that is Guantanamo.
 
The Obama administration passed up multiple opportunities to rescue Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl because the president was dead-set on finding a reason to begin emptying Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, according to a Pentagon official.
And appropriately so.

The detentions are illegal, where the release of the five detainees was lawful in accordance with Article I, Section 9 of the US Constitution, whether an American serviceman was released or not.

What would be ideal is for more countries to agree to take all the detainees, bringing to an end the shameful Bush Era disaster that is Guantanamo.

Yet Obama has steadfastly refused t actually follow the orders of the Supreme Court and put those men on trial, and has actually doubled down on Bush's policies as far as secrecy are concerned. That says something about Obama, doesn't it?
 
Does even one nutter understand that we got something in return for the five prisoners? A year or two from now, we'll be releasing the rest of the detainees and get nothing in return.

Think.

82 of those detainees have been cleared of any wrongdoing, most of them just being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

They need to let those guys go, tomorrow.
 
Does even one nutter understand that we got something in return for the five prisoners? A year or two from now, we'll be releasing the rest of the detainees and get nothing in return.

Think.

82 of those detainees have been cleared of any wrongdoing, most of them just being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

They need to let those guys go, tomorrow.

No argument from me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top