MONEY-LAUNDERING EXPOSED: 14 Pro-Clinton Super PACs and Non-Profits Implicated

[longknife]

If the Foundation wallows in corruption, why not the PACS that support Clinton?



Say, for example, you donate $1,062,857 to Media Matters for America. This is how David Brock would have used your charitable donation in 2014:



Media Matters would receive your $1,062,857 donation

The Bonner Group would earn a $132,857 commission

Media Matters would retain $930,000

Next, Media Matters would give what’s left of your entire donation, $930,000, to the Franklin Education Forum

The Bonner Group would ‘earn’ a $116,250 commission

The Franklin Education Forum would retain $813,750

The Franklin Education Forum would then forward the remaining $813,750 to The Franklin Forum

The Bonner Group would ‘earn’ a $101,718 commission

The Franklin Forum would retain $712,031



In the end, Brock’s solicitor would have pocketed $350,825, almost a third of your initial donation! That’s a far cry from the advertised 12.5% commission.



As bizarre as that scenario may sound, this is exactly what David Brock did in 2014.



Let's watch the Shrillarybots jump in and instantly claim that she has absolutely nothing to do with this. So what? It's just another signal of who supports her and how.



Full story with lots of links and FACTS @ Doug Ross @ Journal: MONEY-LAUNDERING EXPOSED: 14 Pro-Clinton Super PACs and Non-Profits Implicated

 

[jwoodie]

The problem is that her supporters don't care and the undecideds aren't interested. The bar has now been set so low that she can run over it in her wheelchair.