Modern Day Civil War.

You are still a complete coward RW.

I am a loyal god loving American who detests traitorous scum who would turn against their own country.

You're an idiot, but I think you already know that. Fact is dumbass, secession is not unconstitutional nor unAmerican as I've already stated in another post. But you liberal idots seem to be allergic to facts.

Secession is a denunciation of the United States of America.

Thos who advocate it or engage in it deserve to be treated like the traitors they are. If they engage in armed insurrection against this country, they should be hunted down like dogs
 
I am a loyal god loving American who detests traitorous scum who would turn against their own country.

And a coward who would send others to die to protect your way of life.

YOU LIE! Like the traitorous America hating scum you are

It would not be the fine soldiers of this great nation that would die. It would be the traitors who turned against their own country
 
Last edited:
I am a loyal god loving American who detests traitorous scum who would turn against their own country.

You're an idiot, but I think you already know that. Fact is dumbass, secession is not unconstitutional nor unAmerican as I've already stated in another post. But you liberal idots seem to be allergic to facts.

Secession is a denunciation of the United States of America.

Thos who advocate it or engage in it deserve to be treated like the traitors they are. If they engage in armed insurrection against this country, they should be hunted down like dogs

If you believe that then you know nothing of the constitution.

  • United States President James Buchanan, Fourth Annual Message to Congress on the State of the Union December 3, 1860: "The fact is that our Union rests upon public opinion, and can never be cemented by the blood of its citizens shed in civil war. If it can not live in the affections of the people, it must one day perish. Congress possesses many means of preserving it by conciliation, but the sword was not placed in their hand to preserve it by force."
  • United States President Thomas Jefferson: "If any state in the Union will declare that it prefers separation...to a continuance in union... I have no hesitation in saying, 'let us separate.' "
  • The right to liberty, free association and private property
  • Consent as important democratic principle; will of majority to secede should be recognized
  • Making it easier for states to join with others in an experimental union
  • Dissolving such union when goals for which it was constituted are not achieved
  • Self-defense when larger group presents lethal threat to minority or the government cannot adequately defend an area
  • Self-determination of peoples
  • Preserving culture, language, etc. from assimilation or destruction by a larger or more powerful group
  • Furthering diversity by allowing diverse cultures to keep their identity
  • Rectifying past injustices, especially past conquest by a larger power
  • Escaping “discriminatory redistribution,” i.e., tax schemes, regulatory policies, economic programs, etc. that distribute resources away to another area, especially in an undemocratic fashion
  • Enhanced efficiency when the state or empire becomes too large to administer efficiently
  • Preserving “liberal purity” (or “conservative purity”) by allowing less (or more) liberal regions to secede
  • Providing superior constitutional systems which allow flexibility of secession
  • Keeping political entities small and human scale through right to secession
 
That was all settled in 1865. So the discussion is like masturbation: feels good but remains sterile.

Beat on, 7th Texas Cavalry.
 
That was all settled in 1865. So the discussion is like masturbation: feels good but remains sterile.

Beat on, 7th Texas Cavalry.

Spoken like a true idiot troll. If it was settled then your dumbass brethren wouldn't keep saying it's unconstitutional DUMBASS!!!
 
That was all settled in 1865. So the discussion is like masturbation: feels good but remains sterile.

Beat on, 7th Texas Cavalry.

Spoken like a true idiot troll. If it was settled then your dumbass brethren wouldn't keep saying it's unconstitutional DUMBASS!!!

If you wish to call yourself "dumbass" is your business. I am not saying it. However, it is dumbass to consider that secession was constitutional. The war decided that it was not.

Now go hunker in the compound at Overton and shiver in fear. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHH, the feds are coming for you.
 
You're an idiot, but I think you already know that. Fact is dumbass, secession is not unconstitutional nor unAmerican as I've already stated in another post. But you liberal idots seem to be allergic to facts.

Secession is a denunciation of the United States of America.

Thos who advocate it or engage in it deserve to be treated like the traitors they are. If they engage in armed insurrection against this country, they should be hunted down like dogs

If you believe that then you know nothing of the constitution.

  • United States President James Buchanan, Fourth Annual Message to Congress on the State of the Union December 3, 1860: "The fact is that our Union rests upon public opinion, and can never be cemented by the blood of its citizens shed in civil war. If it can not live in the affections of the people, it must one day perish. Congress possesses many means of preserving it by conciliation, but the sword was not placed in their hand to preserve it by force."
  • United States President Thomas Jefferson: "If any state in the Union will declare that it prefers separation...to a continuance in union... I have no hesitation in saying, 'let us separate.' "
  • The right to liberty, free association and private property
  • Consent as important democratic principle; will of majority to secede should be recognized
  • Making it easier for states to join with others in an experimental union
  • Dissolving such union when goals for which it was constituted are not achieved
  • Self-defense when larger group presents lethal threat to minority or the government cannot adequately defend an area
  • Self-determination of peoples
  • Preserving culture, language, etc. from assimilation or destruction by a larger or more powerful group
  • Furthering diversity by allowing diverse cultures to keep their identity
  • Rectifying past injustices, especially past conquest by a larger power
  • Escaping “discriminatory redistribution,” i.e., tax schemes, regulatory policies, economic programs, etc. that distribute resources away to another area, especially in an undemocratic fashion
  • Enhanced efficiency when the state or empire becomes too large to administer efficiently
  • Preserving “liberal purity” (or “conservative purity”) by allowing less (or more) liberal regions to secede
  • Providing superior constitutional systems which allow flexibility of secession
  • Keeping political entities small and human scale through right to secession


NONE of this has anything to do with the US Constitution and the right to secede

LIE ON you traitorous secesionist scum
 
That was all settled in 1865. So the discussion is like masturbation: feels good but remains sterile.

Beat on, 7th Texas Cavalry.

Spoken like a true idiot troll. If it was settled then your dumbass brethren wouldn't keep saying it's unconstitutional DUMBASS!!!

If you wish to call yourself "dumbass" is your business. I am not saying it. However, it is dumbass to consider that secession was constitutional. The war decided that it was not.

Now go hunker in the compound at Overton and shiver in fear. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHH, the feds are coming for you.

Prove that secession is unconstitutional.
 
Secession is a denunciation of the United States of America.

Thos who advocate it or engage in it deserve to be treated like the traitors they are. If they engage in armed insurrection against this country, they should be hunted down like dogs

If you believe that then you know nothing of the constitution.

  • United States President James Buchanan, Fourth Annual Message to Congress on the State of the Union December 3, 1860: "The fact is that our Union rests upon public opinion, and can never be cemented by the blood of its citizens shed in civil war. If it can not live in the affections of the people, it must one day perish. Congress possesses many means of preserving it by conciliation, but the sword was not placed in their hand to preserve it by force."
  • United States President Thomas Jefferson: "If any state in the Union will declare that it prefers separation...to a continuance in union... I have no hesitation in saying, 'let us separate.' "
  • The right to liberty, free association and private property
  • Consent as important democratic principle; will of majority to secede should be recognized
  • Making it easier for states to join with others in an experimental union
  • Dissolving such union when goals for which it was constituted are not achieved
  • Self-defense when larger group presents lethal threat to minority or the government cannot adequately defend an area
  • Self-determination of peoples
  • Preserving culture, language, etc. from assimilation or destruction by a larger or more powerful group
  • Furthering diversity by allowing diverse cultures to keep their identity
  • Rectifying past injustices, especially past conquest by a larger power
  • Escaping “discriminatory redistribution,” i.e., tax schemes, regulatory policies, economic programs, etc. that distribute resources away to another area, especially in an undemocratic fashion
  • Enhanced efficiency when the state or empire becomes too large to administer efficiently
  • Preserving “liberal purity” (or “conservative purity”) by allowing less (or more) liberal regions to secede
  • Providing superior constitutional systems which allow flexibility of secession
  • Keeping political entities small and human scale through right to secession


NONE of this has anything to do with the US Constitution and the right to secede

LIE ON you traitorous secesionist scum

It's a list of justifiable reasons to secede.

Educate yourself.

Neither the Texas Constitution, nor the Constitution of the united States, explicitly or implicitly disallows the secession of Texas (or any other "free and independent State") from the United States. Joining the "Union" was ever and always voluntary, rendering voluntary withdrawal an equally lawful and viable option (regardless of what any self-appointed academic, media, or government "experts"—including Abraham Lincoln himself—may have ever said).
 
Spoken like a true idiot troll. If it was settled then your dumbass brethren wouldn't keep saying it's unconstitutional DUMBASS!!!

If you wish to call yourself "dumbass" is your business. I am not saying it. However, it is dumbass to consider that secession was constitutional. The war decided that it was not.

Now go hunker in the compound at Overton and shiver in fear. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHH, the feds are coming for you.

Prove that secession is unconstitutional.

Because once you secede you are no longer covered by the US Constitution

You are viewed as a Traitorous dog and treated accordingly....just like last time
 
Spoken like a true idiot troll. If it was settled then your dumbass brethren wouldn't keep saying it's unconstitutional DUMBASS!!!

If you wish to call yourself "dumbass" is your business. I am not saying it. However, it is dumbass to consider that secession was constitutional. The war decided that it was not.

Now go hunker in the compound at Overton and shiver in fear. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHH, the feds are coming for you.

Prove that secession is unconstitutional.

Don't have to because the burden of proof is on you as it was on my Southern knucklehead ancestors for being so stupid in the first place.
 
If you wish to call yourself "dumbass" is your business. I am not saying it. However, it is dumbass to consider that secession was constitutional. The war decided that it was not.

Now go hunker in the compound at Overton and shiver in fear. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHH, the feds are coming for you.

Prove that secession is unconstitutional.

Because once you secede you are no longer covered by the US Constitution

You are viewed as a Traitorous dog and treated accordingly....just like last time


Let em go. This way, Mexico can get Texas back. Kewl with me. Lets see how fast they call on the United States of America for protection then. :doubt:

They were cool with spending all that money on a war based on a lie, but for us to help ourselves out is unheard of? Damn.

Sore losers.
 
If you wish to call yourself "dumbass" is your business. I am not saying it. However, it is dumbass to consider that secession was constitutional. The war decided that it was not.

Now go hunker in the compound at Overton and shiver in fear. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHH, the feds are coming for you.

Prove that secession is unconstitutional.

Because once you secede you are no longer covered by the US Constitution

You are viewed as a Traitorous dog and treated accordingly....just like last time

Link.
 
If you wish to call yourself "dumbass" is your business. I am not saying it. However, it is dumbass to consider that secession was constitutional. The war decided that it was not.

Now go hunker in the compound at Overton and shiver in fear. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHH, the feds are coming for you.

Prove that secession is unconstitutional.

Don't have to because the burden of proof is on you as it was on my Southern knucklehead ancestors for being so stupid in the first place.

In other words, you got nothing!
 
Prove that secession is unconstitutional.

Because once you secede you are no longer covered by the US Constitution

You are viewed as a Traitorous dog and treated accordingly....just like last time


Let em go. This way, Mexico can get Texas back. Kewl with me. Lets see how fast they call on the United States of America for protection then. :doubt:

They were cool with spending all that money on a war based on a lie, but for us to help ourselves out is unheard of? Damn.

Sore losers.

What war was based on a lie?

And please provide proof of said lie.
 
Let em go. This way, Mexico can get Texas back.
Mexico could not hold Texas in 1835, when they had a top general and veteran troops, what makes you think they could do better now when they can't even take out the drug dealers in their own country?

You are right in one thing though - the nation would be FAR better served by allowing states which decided to secede to leave peacefully than by listening to cowardly traitorous scum like Rightwinger who want ever more socialism and centralized power.
 

Forum List

Back
Top