Manonthestreet
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2014
- 41,609
- 33,955
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #21
That is from orig article
Which is it ... you've given two different citations ... are you agreeing that your first was bullshit? ...
Read the article again ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is from orig article
Which is it ... you've given two different citations ... are you agreeing that your first was bullshit? ...
Read the article again ...
That is from orig article
Seems the guy is an ATTN defending a client against the state shut down of restaurants while leaving these open......he might know a thing or maybe ehThat is from orig article
Is Twitter your source for legal references? ... really? ...
Seems the guy is an ATTN defending a client against the state shut down of restaurants while leaving these open......he might know a thing or maybe eh
Of course he doesnt ...he posted itSeems the guy is an ATTN defending a client against the state shut down of restaurants while leaving these open......he might know a thing or maybe eh
Do you have a link to the judgement? ... to the complaint? ... to the answer? ... did you know everybody is entitled to a defense attorney? ... do you think this attorney gets his legal information off of Twitter? ...
Of course he doesnt ...he posted it
Yeah an atty defending his client from the state wouldnt know nothing.......rube says whatOf course he doesnt ...he posted it
I understand ... it is YOU who are too damn lazy to do any basic research ... just swallowing whatever crap is posted on Twitter as long as you agree ... send money to them, send money to The Donald, send money to the Proud Boys ...
Do you have a link to the judgement?
I'm sure the authors know local law better than you do.....Nathan M. Hansen on Twitter: "Minn. Statute on point on ability of @GovTimWalz to shut down tribal restaurants and bars. Also see 25 usc 231 https://t.co/8iiwBUoYNt https://t.co/2xEuFV2Dkq" / Twitter ,,you didnt read either....that is from the article stating he can close em down
Federal law always overrides States law where the US Constitution explicitly says it does ... "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;" --- Article I, Section 8, "Clause" 3 ...
The article says this is how the judge ruled ... thus tribal casinos were allowed to stay open ... yes, I did read the article, how else would I know the campaign contributions ...
Minnesota tribes were the first in the nation to negotiate and sign gaming compacts with a state government. Both the tribes and the state agreed to limit casinos to video games of chance (slots) and blackjack. Additionally, both parties agreed that the compacts should be effective in perpetuity.
Minnesota has negotiated 22 tribal-state compacts with 11 Indian tribes, resulting in the establishment of 18 casinos in the state. The class III games permitted under these compacts are blackjack and video games of chance.
The compacts provide for inspection and approval of machines by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, licensing of casino employees, machine payout percentages, and regulation of the play of blackjack. Gambling - Tribal State Gaming Compacts (mn.gov) Now if they can do all that it follows they can shut em down in a health emergency