For those against such a the law I ask: Should a tattoo artist have right to deny a white supremacy tattoo which in effect would be restricting the consumers right to free speech? Say the artists was Jewish and the customer wanted a swastika, would you want him fined or his shop closed for refusing customer service?
Gay marriage denies children their previous contractual rights in marriage to both a mother and father...for life...which harms them. Even divorce which still seeks to keep children in contact with both their mother and father, is kinder to children than gay marriage.
The US Supreme Court has already spoken on Constitutional rights that harm children. New York vs Ferber reinforces this new Mississippi law. Not only can religious people object, but also those who object to harming children. Look for this law to be expanded soon:
New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747, 756–57 (1982)
It is evident beyond the need for elaboration that a State’s interest in “
safeguarding the physical and psychological well-being of a minor” is “compelling.” . . . Accordingly,
we have sustained legislation aimed at protecting the physical and emotional well-being of youth even when the laws have operated in the sensitive area of constitutionally protected right https://law.ku.edu/sites/law.drupal.ku.edu/files/docs/law_review/v61/02-Preston_Final.pdf
